1 / 9

Monitoring analysis preview

Monitoring analysis preview. 3 rd October, 2014. Rakhine State WASH Cluster meeting 1. Record 2. Report 3. ANALYSIS 4. dissemination. Access to water supply. Objective 2 – Sanitation,…latrines and hand wash Objective 4 – security for women Objective 5 community ownership.

ash
Télécharger la présentation

Monitoring analysis preview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Monitoring analysis preview 3rd October, 2014. Rakhine State WASH Cluster meeting 1. Record 2. Report 3. ANALYSIS 4. dissemination

  2. Access to water supply

  3. Objective 2 – Sanitation,…latrines and hand washObjective 4 – security for womenObjective 5 community ownership

  4. Objective 5 - Self-maintained functional water supplies and cleaned latrines

  5. Objective 4 - Access for disabled, (expressed in terms of satisfaction)

  6. Indicator 4.3a Women are represented and participate in decisions affecting WASH service delivery

  7. Initial analysis Database highlights and identified problems • Only CCCM data, not incl. WASH data. • Water test results will improve CCCM data and database analysis • SWM methodology revised • Ownership of maintenance • Evolving design • Consistent reporting format • Gaps, trends, quality, avoiding comparisons Identifiable assumptions • Water supply is sufficient, however, distance needs to be introduced in criteria • Large gaps in access to functional latrines • SWM seems not to be a priority in some sites • ODF communities are possible • TLS has some total WASH gaps • Women, and whole communities are under represented in WASH • There is no evidence of MHM facilities • There are encouraging signs of community ownership

  8. Priorities and further analysis Priorities • OBJECTIVE 2 - Achieve latrine minimum SPHERE • OBJECTIVE 4 - Raise standard of TLS WASH services • OBJECTIVE 5 - Promote community ownership (maintenance – tools & training) • OBJECTIVE 4 – access for disabled • OBJECTIVE 4 – access to MHM • OBJECTIVE 5 – establish user groups with equitable representation, tors, etc Further expected analysis • Trends of increases, stagnation or decreases in services • More detailed water supply quantity + quality results • “WASH Cluster input,…”

  9. Wow,…the end! For now!

More Related