1 / 30

340 likes | 488 Vues

CIS 720. Concurrency Control. Locking. Atomic statement Can be used to perform two or more updates atomically Th1: …. < x = x + 1; y = z>;……. Th2:………….<m = m + 1;….>;……. Transactions. A database system is a set of shared data objects

Télécharger la présentation
## CIS 720

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.
Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only.
Download presentation by click this link.
While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

**CIS 720**Concurrency Control**Locking**• Atomic statement • Can be used to perform two or more updates atomically Th1: …. < x = x + 1; y = z>;……. Th2:………….<m = m + 1;….>;…….**Transactions**• A database system is a set of shared data objects • A transaction is a sequential program which accesses data objects in the database • Each transaction is a sequence of read and write operations**The Transaction Model**• Examples of primitives for transactions.**Transactions**• Each transaction is a sequence of read and write operations • The read set of transaction T, denoted by rs(t), is a set of variables read by T. • The write set ws(T) is defined similarly**Banking System**Withdraw(amount, account) { y = db.account; if y > amount y = y - amount; db.account = y; } Deposit(amount, account) { x = db.account; x = x + amount; db.account = x; }**A database has an invariant I (integrity constraint).**• Each transaction is designed to preserve I • If transactions are executed simultaneously, then they may interfere and invalidate I. • The task of concurrency control is to preserve I.**Banking System**Transaction 1: Deposit $50 in Acc1 Transaction 2: Deposit $70 in Acc2 Possible interleavings T1.x = db.Acc1; T1.x = T1.x + 50 T2.x = db.Acc1; T2.x = T2.x + 70; db.Acc1 = T1.x db.Acc1 = T2.x Deposit(amount, account) { x = db.account; x = x + amount; db.account = x; }**Concurrency Control**• General organization of managers for handling transactions.**Concurrency Control**• General organization of managers for handling distributed transactions.**A schedule is any execution of a set of transaction**operations • Two schedules T1 and T2 are equivalent if - all read operations return the same value in both schedules - the final database state is the same in both schedules**T1: r1(x)0 w1(x)1**T2: r2(y)0 r2(x)1 w2(y)2 T1: r1(x)0 w1(x)1 T2: r2(y)0 r2(x)1 w2(y)2 T1: r1(x)0 w1(x)1 T2: r2(y)0 r2(x)1 w2(y)2**T1: r1(y)1 w1(x)1**T2: w2(y)1 r2(x)1 w2(y)2 T1: r1(y)0 w1(x)1 T2: w2(y)1 r2(x)1 w2(y)2 T1: r1(y)0 w1(x)1 T2: w2(y)1 r2(x)0 w2(y)2**A serial schedule is a schedule in which transactions**execute one at a time. • We know that a serial schedule preserves IC of the database • A concurrency control algorithm can restricts the execution so that all schedules are serial.**A CC ensures that all schedules are equivalent to some**serial schedule • A schedule that is equivalent to a serial schedule is called serializable**Untyped Concurrency control**• Assumes that all transactions with intersecting read and write sets interfere with one another. • How can we determine whether a schedule is serializable • Let T1,…,Tn be a set of transactions • Define a graph G with transactions as nodes • There is an edge from Ti to Tj if - there exists a read rj(x) which reads from wi(x) - there exists a read ri(x) that occurs before wj(x) - there exists a write wi(x) that occurs before wj(x)**Two-phase Locking**• Obtain a read or write lock before reading or writing a variable respectively. • rl(x): read lock operation • ul(x): unlock operation • wl(x): write lock operation**Locking rules:**- two read locks can be given at the same time; read and write lock must be exclusive * conflict table**T1: r1(y)1 w1(x)1**T2: w2(y)1 r2(x)1 w2(y)2 T1: rl(y) r1(y)1 ul(y)wl(x) w1(x)1 ul(x) T2: wl(y) w2(y)1 ul(y)rl(x) r2(x)1 ul(x)wl(y) w2(y)2 ul(y)**Two phase locking rule**• Locking phase: acquire all locks • Unlocking phase: release all locks • Two-phase locking ensures serializability • It is prone to deadlocks**Two-Phase Locking (1)**• Two-phase locking.**Two-Phase Locking (2)**• Strict two-phase locking.**Writeahead Log**• a) A transaction • b) – d) The log before each statement is executed**Graph based protocols**• Impose a partial ordering on data items • If d1 d2, then any transaction accessing both d1 and d2 must first access d1 before d2.**Tree protocol**• Only exclusive locks are allowed • First item to be locked can be any one • Next, a data item can be locked only if the parent is already locked • Data items can be unlocked at any time • A data item cannot be relocked by a transaction.**Semantics-based concurrency control**• If transactions T1 and T2 do not interfere then they can be executed concurrently. • Two operations op1 and op2 do not conflict if they commute (that is, op1; op2 is the same as op2; op1)**Predicate Locking**• Each transaction specifies a predicate as a lock. • A new transaction can execute if it does not interfere with existing predicate locks

More Related