1 / 23

Federalism

Federalism. Figure 3.1: Lines of Power in Three Systems of Government. Unitary Government National Government - Supreme. Confederation States - Supreme. Federal Government Shared Power-Federal Government - Supreme in Some Areas Only. American Federalism.

Télécharger la présentation

Federalism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Federalism

  2. Figure 3.1: Lines of Power in Three Systems of Government

  3. Unitary Government National Government - Supreme

  4. Confederation States - Supreme

  5. Federal Government Shared Power-Federal Government - Supreme in Some Areas Only

  6. American Federalism • A bold, new plan to protect personal liberty • Founders believed that neither national nor state government would have authority over the other because power derives from the people, who shift their support. • New plan had no historical precedent. • Tenth Amendment was added as an afterthought, to define the power of states

  7. John Marshall Chief Justice of Supreme Court (1801-1835)

  8. Marbury vs Madison (1803) Judicial Review

  9. McCulloch vs Maryland (1819) “necessary and proper clause”

  10. Article I, Section 8 Article VI, the Supremacy Clause 10th Amendment Article IV

  11. Dual federalism • Both national and state governments supreme in their own spheres • Hence interstate versus intrastate commerce • Early product-based distinction difficult • "Original package" also unsatisfactory

  12. Grants-in-aid • Grants show how political realities modify legal authority. • Began before the Constitution with "land grant colleges," various cash grants to states • Dramatically increased in scope in the twentieth century • Were attractive for various reasons • Federal budget surpluses (nineteenth century) • Federal income tax became a flexible tool • Federal control of money supply meant national government could print more money • "Free" money for state officials

  13. Meeting national needs: 1960s shift in grants-in-aid • Meeting national needs: 1960s shift in grants-in-aid • From what states demanded • To what federal officials found important as national needs

  14. Categorical grants versus revenue sharing • Categorical grants for specific purposes; often require local matching funds • Block grants devoted to general purposes with few restrictions • Revenue sharing requires no matching funds and provides freedom in how to spend. • Distributed by statistical formula • Ended in 1986

  15. Mandates • Most concern civil rights and environmental protection • Administrative and financial problems often result • Growth in mandates, 1981 to 1991 • Features of mandates • Regulatory statutes and amendments of previous legislation • New areas of federal involvement • Considerable variation in clarity, administration, and costs

  16. Federal courts have fueled the growth of mandates Court orders and prisons, school desegregation, busing, hiring practices, police brutality

  17. Conditions of aid • Received by states voluntarily, in theory • Financial dependence blurs the theory • Civil rights generally the focus of most important conditions in the 1960's, a proliferation has continued since the 1970's

  18. Devolution

  19. Renewed effort to shift important functions to states by Republican-controlled Congress in 1994 Key issue: welfare (i.e., the AFDC program) These and other turn-back efforts were referred to as devolution. • Old idea, but led by Congress • Clinton agreed with need to scale back size and activities of federal government.

  20. Figure 3.2: The Changing Purposes of Federal Grants to State and Local Governments Source: Budget of the U.S. Government, Fiscal Year 1999, Table 12.2, 205-210.

  21. Figure 3.3: Federal Aid to State and Local Governments, 1980-2000 Source: Budget of the U.S. Government, Fiscal Year 1998, Historical Tables, Table 6.1, 99.

  22. Figure 3.5: Devolution in the Polls: The States over Washington

  23. For more information about this topic, link to the Metropolitan Community College Political Science Web Site http://socsci.mccneb.edu/pos/polscmain.htm

More Related