1 / 51

Developing STEM Talent and How it Impacts Adult Achievement

Developing STEM Talent and How it Impacts Adult Achievement. Camilla P. Benbow Vanderbilt University. Human Capital. Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth. A 50-year longitudinal study of intellectual talent N > 5000 Julian C. Stanley Founder (1971) Johns Hopkins University

aspen-palmer
Télécharger la présentation

Developing STEM Talent and How it Impacts Adult Achievement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Developing STEM Talent and How it Impacts Adult Achievement Camilla P. Benbow Vanderbilt University

  2. Human Capital

  3. Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth • A 50-year longitudinal study of intellectual talent • N > 5000 • Julian C. Stanley • Founder (1971) • Johns Hopkins University • Camilla P. Benbow & David Lubinski • Co-directors • Vanderbilt University

  4. Differentiation of Talent

  5. The SMPY Longitudinal Study: Five Cohorts of Intellectual Talent

  6. Differences Within the Top 1% Lubinski, D. (2009). Exceptional cognitive ability: The phenotype.  Behavior Genetics, 39, 350-358.

  7. Doctorates (N = 534) Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2008). Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity. Psychological Science, 19, 957-961.

  8. STEM Accomplishments Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2008). Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity. Psychological Science, 19, 957-961.

  9. BA and BS Degrees In STEM and the Humanities Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns for creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948-952.

  10. MA and MS Degrees In STEM and the Humanities Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns for creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948-952.

  11. MDs and JDs Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns for creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948-952.

  12. PhDs In STEM and Humanities Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns for creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948-952.

  13. Tenure-Track Faculty at Top 50 U.S. Universities Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns for creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948-952.

  14. Patents and Literary Accomplishments Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns for creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948-952.

  15. Favorite High School Class Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604-614.

  16. Least Favorite High School Class Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604-614.

  17. Conferred Bachelor Degree Groups Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604-614.

  18. Conferred Graduate Degree Groups Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604-614.

  19. Occupational Groups Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604-614.

  20. Fifty Years of Longitudinal Research Super, D. E., & Bachrach, P. B. (1957). Scientific careers and vocational development theory. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University. Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over fifty years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817-835.

  21. Creative Accomplishments Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2013). Creativity and technical innovation:  Spatial ability’s unique role. Psychological Science, 24, 1831-1836.

  22. Creative Accomplishments Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2013). Creativity and technical innovation:  Spatial ability’s unique role. Psychological Science, 24, 1831-1836.

  23. Creative Accomplishments Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2013). Creativity and technical innovation:  Spatial ability’s unique role. Psychological Science, 24, 1831-1836.

  24. The SMPY Longitudinal Study: Five Cohorts of Intellectual Talent

  25. Midlife Follow-Up

  26. Highest Degree Obtained

  27. Employed Full Time

  28. Income

  29. Income of Full Time Workers

  30. Occupational Membership

  31. Occupational Membership

  32. Occupational Stature

  33. Creative Accomplishments

  34. Relationship Status

  35. Satisfaction

  36. Satisfaction

  37. Phase 1: STEM Dose and STEM Achievement STEM Special Academic Training STEM College Courses While in High School Achievement Criteria Dose STEM AP or Other Courses for College Credit STEM PhD STEM Competitions STEM Achievement Criteria STEM Special Classes STEM Dose STEM Research STEM Inventions and Projects STEM Patent STEM Advanced Subject Matter STEM Writing Opportunities STEM Academic Clubs Wai, J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2010). Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 860-871.

  38. Phase 1: STEM Educational Dose and STEM Outcomes Wai, J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2010). Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 860-871.

  39. Selection Bias Reduction, Post-MatchingBalance Improvement Across 14 Pre-Treatment Covariates Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2013).  When less is more: Effects of grade skipping on adult STEM accomplishments among mathematically precocious youth.  Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 176-198.

  40. Doctoral Degrees

  41. STEM Graduate Degrees

  42. STEM Publications

  43. Patents

  44. Doctoral Degree Graduation

  45. STEM Ph.D. Graduation

  46. First STEM Publication

  47. First Patent

  48. Is There A Total Effect of Acceleration On Accumulated Creative Products? Grade Skippers & Matched Controls

More Related