1 / 20

Mott Transition and Superconductivity in Two-dimensional

Mott Transition and Superconductivity in Two-dimensional. t-t’-U Hubbard model. Masao Ogata (Univ. of Tokyo) H. Yokoyama (Tohoku Univ.) Y. Tanaka (Nagoya Univ.). Mott transition (Brinkman-Rice transition) Superconductivity in Hubbard model. Doped case.

astanfill
Télécharger la présentation

Mott Transition and Superconductivity in Two-dimensional

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mott Transition and Superconductivity in Two-dimensional t-t’-U Hubbard model Masao Ogata (Univ. of Tokyo) H. Yokoyama (Tohoku Univ.) Y. Tanaka (Nagoya Univ.) Mott transition (Brinkman-Rice transition) Superconductivity in Hubbard model Doped case Variational Monte Carlo （VMC) study

  2. Mott transition at half-filling “Doped Mott insulator” ----- What is Mott insulator? t-J model  Heisenberg model (d  0) We need to study Hubbard model. Brinkman-Rice transition doublon number  0 at Uc (second-order phase transition) <d> However this Brinkman-Rice transition is not observed in VMC. Uc Yokoyama-Shiba, JPSJ (1987)

  3. Mott transition at half-filling Brinkman-Rice transition is not observed in VMC. <d> E=0 for U >Uc Uc (Brinkman-Rice) Doublon number is always finite. Yokoyama-Shiba, JPSJ (1987) We modify variational states. Mott transition as a first-order (like a liquid-gas phase transition)

  4. Φ Superconductivity at half-filling • Organic conductors k-(BEDT-TTF)2X X1- , BEDT-TTF 0.5+ = quarter filling BEDT-TTF layer X layer κ-ET CuO2 t’ t’ t t If 2 BEDT-TTF molecules form a dimer, it can be regarded as a single site. H. Kino and H. Fukuyama, J.Phys.Soc.Japan 64, 2726 (1995).

  5. Superconductivity in κ-(BEDT-TTF)2X SC AF insulator First order K. Kanoda d-wave pressure U/t is controled Substitution of X (not filling control) insulator  SC  metal Nonmagnetic insulator SC Fisrt order Nonmagnetic down to T=32mK Y. Shimizu et al (NMR)

  6. κ-ET CuO2 Superconductivity at half-filling t’ t’ t t • Organic conductors k-(BEDT-TTF)2X • Superconductivity • first-order Mott transitionk-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br • Also Spin-Liquidstate k-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3 • 2) High-Tc cuprates T’-La2-xRxCuO4（R = Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Lu, Y）Tc=21.4K T’ -structure Tsukada et al., SSC 133, 427 (2005)

  7. Yokoyama-Ogata-Tanaka: Cond-mat/0607470 Motivation for t-t’-U Hubbard model Mott transition as a liquid-gas phase transition Superconductivity at half-filling Effects oft’ : Frustration (AF  superconductivity, RVB-Insulator) We have to study the Hubbard model. So far, quantum MC is negative, but FLEX gives SC. Doped case Weak coupling U<W BCS-like Strong coupling U>W t-J like = doped Mott insulator T=0 Variational Monte Carlo （VMC) study

  8. Modified variational states Usual Gutzwiller factor nearest-neighbor doublon-holon correlation Doublon-holon bound states are favored in wave functions

  9. PQis important Mott Transition bound（μ→ 1 ） free（μ→ 0 ） conductive insulating variational states: Fermi sea, d-wave SC, mean-field AF First-order Mott transition is realized.

  10. half filling (d=0) I. Phase diagram t-t’-U Hubbard model RVB insulator (Para-insulator with d-wave order parameter) d-wave SC ×L = 10 ＋L = 12

  11. First-order Mott transition half filling (d=0) Energy crossing Doublon density order parameter of Mott transition (similar to gas-liquid transition) d-wave SC RVB insulator Uc

  12. half filling (d=0) d-wave to RVB insulator d-wave pair correlation function d-wave is enhanced at U / t < 6.5 t’ / t ~ －0.25 Wave function has d-wave order parameter, but Pd vanishes. “RVB insulator” Uc

  13. Momentum distribution function nodal point U < Uc : Fermi surface (metallic) U > Uc : no Fermi surface (insulator)

  14. half filling (d=0) I. Phase diagram t-t’-U Hubbard model Similar results for triangular lattice RVB insulator (Para-insulator with d-wave order parameter) d-wave SC ×L = 10 ＋L = 12 Gan et al., PRL 94, 067005 (2005) d-wave SC AF (Gutzwiller approx.)

  15. less-than-half filling II. DopedCase t-t’-U Hubbard model RVB insulator (Para-insulator with d-wave order parameter) d-wave SC ×L = 10 ＋L = 12 doping

  16. less-than-half filling II. DopedCase d = 0.12 d-wave pair correlation function for various values of t’ Large U (U > Uco) “Doped Mott insulator” doublon-holon bound state = n.n. doublon-holon = virtual process inducing J-term t-J region (Excess holes are mobile) USI Small U (U < Uco) weak-coupling region

  17. Condensation energy 1) Small U (U < USI) very small DE DE ~ 10-4 t at U=4t ~ 0.4K DE = Enorm - ESC PQ|FS PQ|BCS DE ~ e- t / U consistent with QMC, and weak-coupling theory 2) Intermediate U (USI < U < UCO) abrupt increase of DE 3) Large U (UCO < U) large DE DE ~ e- a U / t = e- 4a t / J consistent with t-J model

  18. Result 2: t’-dependence for various values of U / t d = 0.12, 0.14 Large U (U > Uco) U / t = 8 U / t = 12 U / t = 16 Small U (U < Uco) U / t = 4 t’ > 0 -- unfavorable van Hove singularity (electron doped) t’ = - 0.15 High-Tc should be inU>Uco

  19. Result 3: doping-dependence t-J region weak-coupling region t’ = -0.1 t’ = -0.1 U / t = 8 U / t = 4 t’ = -0.3 High-Tc should be in U>Uco (t-J region) Consistent with Uemura’s plot (Tc ∝ d)

  20. Conclusions “RVB insulator” • Modified variational state doublon-holon bound state is important. • Mott transition (half-filling)(Brinkman-Rice) • Doped case “Doped Mott insulator” large U (non-BCS) (t-J region) small U (BCS-like) (weak-coupling region) d-wave SC is enhanced for t’< 0 for U > Uco ~ 6.5 t High-TC cuprates belong to the large U region (non-BCS) Experimental check: t’ -dependences (Uemura plot) Kinetic energy gain (optical sum rule) large U----- kinetic energy gain in SC (non-BCS) (t-J region) small U ------ potential energy gain in SC (BCS-like)

More Related