1 / 7

Retail Market Subcommittee Performance Measures Report

Summary of transaction comparison for 2nd quarter 2009 showing historical usage and protocol deviations, with insights on errors and out-of-protocol transactions leading to performance discrepancies in move-in and move-out processes.

athena-thompson
Télécharger la présentation

Retail Market Subcommittee Performance Measures Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Retail Market SubcommitteeSeptember 09, 2009Performance Measures2ndQuarter 2009Transaction Comparison

  2. Summary Historical Usage Sent transactions (867_02) fell below the 98% within protocol for Standard Move-In and Priority Move-Ins. This is due to: 1: a protocol calculation error on 2: duplicate 867_02 transactions sent to ERCOT. • 867_02 transactions were forwarded within the 4 hour protocol. Only the calculation is in error. • One TDSP sent 1,198 transactions multiple times resulting in 13,705 transactions out of protocol. Standard Move In Received transaction (814_07) fell below the target 98% within protocol. Priority Move-In Received transactions (814_07) fell below the target 98% within protocol. • This is due to one CR submitting the transactions outside protocol.

  3. Switches

  4. Standard Move-In

  5. Priority Move-In

  6. Move-Out

  7. ESI ID Create/Maintain

More Related