1 / 51

Adaptive randomization

Adaptive randomization. S. Balakrishnan Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences. Randomization. Randomization. Definition: randomization is a process by which each participant has the same chance of being assigned to either intervention or control. Fundamental Point.

Télécharger la présentation

Adaptive randomization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Adaptive randomization S. Balakrishnan Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences

  2. Randomization

  3. Randomization • Definition: • randomization is a process by which each participant has the same chance of being assigned to either intervention or control.

  4. Fundamental Point • Randomization trends to produce study groups comparable with respect to known and unknown risk factors, removes investigator bias in the allocation of participants, and guarantees that statistical tests will have valid significance levels.

  5. Randomization: Types: • Complete (Simple): equal allocation • Restricted: When equal number of patients required in each treatment group • Covariate adaptive: Similar number of patients in each treatment group – Patients groups similar with respect to prognostic factors. • Response adaptive randomization: treatment assignments depend upon previous patients response to treatment.

  6. Two Types of Bias in Randomization • Selection bias • occurs if the allocation process is predictable. If any bias exists as to what treatment particular types of participants should receive, then a selection bias might occur. • Accidental bias • can arise if the randomization procedure does not achieve balance on risk factors or prognostic covariates especially in small studies.

  7. Fixed Allocation Randomization • Fixed allocation randomization procedures assign the intervention to participants with a pre-specified probability, usually equal, and that allocation probability is not altered as the study processes • Simple randomization • Blocked randomization • Stratified randomization

  8. Randomization Types • Simple randomization

  9. Simple randomization Random numbers: Treatment – A & B = 20 Patients 0 – 4 = A 5 – 9 = B 12 = A 8 = B

  10. Simple Randomization • Option 1: to toss an unbiased coin for a randomized trial with two treatment (call them A and B) • Option 2: to use a random digit table. A randomization list may be generated by using the digits, one per treatment assignment, starting with the top row and working downwards: • Option 3: to use a random number-producing algorithm, available on most digital computer systems.

  11. Advantages • Each treatment assignment is completely unpredictable, and probability theory guarantees that in the long run the numbers of patients on each treatment will not be radically different and easy to implement

  12. Disadvantages • Unequal groups • one treatment is assigned more often than another • Time imbalance or chronological bias • One treatment is given with greater frequency at the beginning of a trial and another with greater frequency at the end of the trial. • Simple randomization is not often used, even for large studies.

  13. Randomization Types • Blocked randomization

  14. Blocked Randomization (permuted block randomization) • Blocked randomization is to ensure exactly equal treatment numbers at certain equally spaced point in the sequence of patients assignments • A table of random permutations is used containing, in random order, all possible combinations (permutations) of a small series of figures. • Block size: 6,8,10,16,20.

  15. Advantages • The balance between the number of participants in each group is guaranteed during the course of randomization. The number in each group will never differ by more than b/2 when b is the length of the block.

  16. Disadvantages • Analysis may be more complicated (in theory) • Correct analysis could have bigger power • Changing block size can avoid the randomization to be predictable • Mid-block inequality might occur if the interim analysis is intended.

  17. geographic location previous exposure site Randomization Types • Stratified randomization

  18. Stratified Randomization • Stratified randomization process involves measuring the level of the selected factors for participants, determining to which stratum each belongs, and performing the randomization within the stratum. Within each stratum, the randomization process itself could be simple randomization, but in practice most clinical trials use some blocked randomization strategy.

  19. Table 3. Stratification Factors and Levels (323=18 Strata)

  20. Table 4 Stratified Randomization with Block Size of Four

  21. Advantages • To make two study groups appear comparable with regard to specified factors, the power of the study can be increased by taking the stratification into account in the analysis.

  22. Disadvantages • The prognostic factor used in stratified randomization may be unimportant and other factors may be identified later are of more importance

  23. Mechanism

  24. An Example of Stratified Randomization • Patients will be stratified according to the following criteria: • 1) Treatment center (Hospital A vs Hospital B vs Hospital C) • 2) N-stage(N2 vs N3) • 3) T-stage (T1-2 vs T3-4)

  25. What should be in the protocol? • A dynamic allocation scheme will be used to randomize patients in equal proportions within each of 12 strata. The scheme first creates time-ordered blocks of size divisible by three and then uses simple randomization to divide the patients in each block into three treatment arms, in equal proportion. The block sizes will be chosen randomly so that each block contains either 6 or 9 patients.

  26. Cont… • This procedure helps to ensure both randomness and investigator blinding (the block sizes are known only to the statistician), as recommended by Freedman et al. Randomization will be generated by the consulting statistician in sealed envelopes, labeled by stratum, which will be unsealed after patient registration.

  27. Adaptive designs “An adaptive design is a CT design that uses accumulating data to decide how to modify aspects of the study after its initiation without undermining the trial’s validity and integrity.”

  28. Adaptive designs: • Balancing based upon probabilistic baseline covariate adaptive randomization • Combining phases I & II. • Dropping a treatment arm • Modifying the sample size • Stopping early—success / failure

  29. Adaptive Designs

  30. Adaptive Randomization • Number adaptive • Biased coin method • Baseline adaptive (MINIMIZATION) • Outcome adaptive

  31. Biased Coin Method • Advantages • Investigators can not determine the next assignment by discovery the blocking factor. • Disadvantages • Complexity in use • Statistical analysis cumbersome

  32. Minimization • Minimization is an well -accepted statistical method to limit imbalance in relative small randomized clinical trials in conditions with known important prognostic baseline characteristics. • It called minimization because imbalance in the distribution of prognostic factors are minimized

  33. Table 1 Some baseline characteristics of patients in a controlled trial of mustine versus talc in the control of pleural effusions in patients with breast cancer (Frientiman et al, 1983)

  34. Minimization Factors

  35. Table 2 Characteristics of the first 29 patients in a clinical trial using minimization to allocate treatment

  36. Table 3 Calculation of imbalance in patient characteristics for allocating treatment to the thirtieth patient

  37. Advantages • It can reduce the imbalance into the minimum level especially in small trial • Computer Program available (called Mini) and also not difficult to perform ‘by hand’ • Minimization and stratification on the same prognostic factors produce similar levels of power, but minimization may add slightly more power if stratification does not include all of the covariance

  38. Disadvantages • It is a bit complicated process compare to the simple randomization

  39. Practical Considerations

  40. ADAPTIVE (DYNAMIC) RANDOMIZATION

  41. BALANCING (COVARIATE) ADAPTIVE RANDOMIZATION

  42. URN RANDOMIZATION

  43. EFRON’S WEIGHTED COINE

  44. RESPONSE (OUTCOME) ADAPTIVE RANDOMIZATION

  45. PLAY THE WINNER

  46. DROP THE LOSER

  47. DOUBLY ADAPTIVE BIASED COINS

More Related