1 / 8

Chromium 6

Chromium 6. Cancer and Water Quality By Breanna Young. Research Question. Is there a correlation between Chromium VI levels in the water and Cancer Incidence Rates? Nevada is not included (no released incidence rates reports of cancer) Wisconsin not included (trouble with the data).

austin
Télécharger la présentation

Chromium 6

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chromium 6 Cancer and Water Quality By Breanna Young

  2. Research Question • Is there a correlation between Chromium VI levels in the water and Cancer Incidence Rates? • Nevada is not included (no released incidence rates reports of cancer) • Wisconsin not included (trouble with the data)

  3. Norman, Oklahoma (1) • 12.90 parts per billion • Strong correlation • Cleveland, Oklahoma, and Logan counties • Garber- Wellington Aquifer • Childhood Cancers

  4. Tallahassee, Florida (6) • 1.25 parts per billion • There is no correlation. • On the same Aquifer as Miami (29) • Leon County has low cancer rate compared to surrounding areas.

  5. Indianapolis, Indiana (32) • No detectable trace • High Cancer Rates • Little to no Correlation • High level in Plymouth (26.50 parts per billion) • Plymouth has a strong correlation

  6. Texas has Chromium 6-free Water? • Plano (33) • San Antonio (35) • Plano low cancer rate • San Antoino higher cancer rates • 50/50 on correlation

  7. Chromium 6 per Person • Cleveland County averages 30 ppb per person

  8. Result • Not enough data • Should select more cities. • Take a look at locations of high cancer rates • Norman has a very strong correlation • Could be a positive correlation to the research question.

More Related