1 / 72

Seismic Mitigation

Seismic Mitigation. Division of the State Architect Office of Public School Construction September 29, 2011. Seismic Mitigation Program. Funding Assembly Bill 127 Proposition 1D (2006) Up to $199.5 million originally approved by the voters From New Construction funding

axel
Télécharger la présentation

Seismic Mitigation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Seismic Mitigation Division of the State Architect Office of Public School Construction September 29, 2011

  2. Seismic Mitigation Program Funding • Assembly Bill 127 • Proposition 1D (2006) • Up to $199.5 million originally approved by the voters • From New Construction funding • State Allocation Board (SAB) granted the maximum • $194.8 million currently remaining

  3. Amended Regulations SAB adopted on June 22, 2011 Effective September 8, 2011 The amendments allow for an increased number of qualifying projects.

  4. Amended Regulations

  5. “No-Cost” Seismic Eligibility Evaluation

  6. “No-Cost” Seismic Eligibility Evaluation • Basic evaluation to determine the Seismic Mitigation Program (SMP) eligibility of the district’s buildings • Required evaluation is completed by a State contractor at no cost to the district • Submitted to DSA for the review of seismic projects

  7. “No-Cost” Seismic Eligibility Evaluation • Only identifies risks related to ground shaking • Risks due to faulting, liquefaction or landslide potential are not covered • Does not identify the necessary mitigation measures • Districts are still required to hire a structural engineer for an in-depth analysis of the unacceptable risk of injury and the minimum mitigation measures needed

  8. “No-Cost” Seismic Eligibility Evaluation • $127,347 allocated on a first-come, first-served basis • Currently, OPSC may have received sufficient requests to exhaust the allocation

  9. “No-Cost” Seismic Eligibility Evaluation Submit a request letter including: • Building specifics • How the district identified the Category 2 buildings • Statement that the Category 2 buildings were designed for occupancy by students and staff • Intention to participate in the SMP • Name and contact information of the district representative

  10. “No-Cost” Seismic Eligibility Evaluation Building Specifications list must include: • Site • DSA number • Building identifier (i.e. Bldg A) • Square footage • Current use • Original use (if applicable) • Category 2 construction type

  11. “No-Cost” Seismic Eligibility Evaluation Building Specification Example

  12. “No-Cost” Seismic Eligibility Evaluation Please send “No-Cost” Evaluation requests to: Alan Shoemaker Office of Public School Construction P.O. Box 980610 West Sacramento, CA 95798-0610 Phone Number: (916) 376-5359

  13. Seismic Mitigation ProgramProject ApprovalDivision of the State Architect

  14. Overview • Project submittal & review by DSA & OPSC: 5 PHASES • Oversight: DSA Headquarters & Regional Office • Applicable Documents/References: • Procedure 08-03 (Rev. 9-15-2011) • Eligibility Evaluation Template (Rapid Evaluation) • DSA-4 (Application for Review of Eligibility Evaluation)

  15. Project Review Phase 1. Verify Eligibility Phase 2. Replacement Option Analysis (not required for Rehabilitation projects) Phase 3. Seismic Rehabilitation: Pre-Application (not required for Replacement projects) Phase 4. Project Application to DSA Phase 5. Application for Funding to OPSC

  16. Site Hazard + Building Type + Structural Deficiencies Building Eligibility Collapse Potential Phase 1:Verify Eligibility Eligibility Determination

  17. Phase 1: Verify Eligibility Site Hazard: • Ground Shaking Documentation: • Eligibility Evaluation Template (based on evaluation standard ASCE/SEI 31-03)

  18. Phase 1: Verify Eligibility Site Hazard: • Liquefaction • Faulting • Landslide Documentation: • Geologic analysis to California Geological Survey (CGS) for review • Eligibility Evaluation Template

  19. Phase 1: Verify Eligibility Eligible Building Type: • 13 non-wood frame building types (see PR 08-03) based on standard classifications & definitions in AB 300 Report (all Category 2 buildings) • Mixed construction containing at least one of the eligible building types • Consult with structural engineer to determine building type

  20. Phase 1: Verify Eligibility Structural Deficiencies: • Must identify one or more deficiency • Use the list of potential deficiencies in Eligibility Evaluation Template; if identifying “other,” provide explanation

  21. Phase 1: Verify Eligibility Structural Deficiencies: • Rapid evaluation: additional deficiencies to be identified in detailed structural engineer’s report

  22. Phase 1: Verify Eligibility Collapse Potential: Determined by structural engineer’s analysis based on the combination of site hazard, building type and identified deficiencies

  23. Phase 1: Verify Eligibility Required Submittals: • DSA-4 (Application) • $500 Fee • Eligibility Evaluation Report (template & appendices) • Geologic hazard analysis & CGS concurrence (not required to document ground shaking)

  24. Phase 1: Verify Eligibility DSA Review: • Designated staff: DSA Headquarters • Review for completeness • Review analysis & findings, coordinate with CGS concurrence (if applicable) • DSA letter of concurrence required for Phase 2/Phase 3

  25. Phase 2: Replacement Analysis Goal: Establish eligibility for replacement funding by estimating scope of seismic rehabilitation & code required upgrades to mitigate the hazard Not required for Rehabilitation Projects

  26. Phase 2: Replacement Analysis DSA Review: • DSA Headquarters • If mitigation addresses liquefaction/landslide conditions, geologic analysis & CGS concurrence must be obtained • DSA Findings: Concurrence Letter

  27. Phase 2: Replacement Analysis Special conditions: Eligible buildings located within 50 feet of an active fault must be replaced (per Education Code 17212.5 & CCR Title 24 Part 1, Section 4-317) Contact DSA HQ to obtain concurrence letter.

  28. Phase 3:Pre-Application Goal: Establish criteria for evaluation, design, material testing, condition assessment requirements for rehabilitation projects & obtain DSA concurrence prior to project design Not Required for Replacement Projects

  29. Phase 3:Pre-Application Required Submittals: • DSA-1.REH (Application) • $2,000 Retainer • Evaluation & Design Criteria Report (based on CBC Chapter 34 & design standards) DSA Review: • Regional Office • Report approval with DSA stamp

  30. Phase 4:Project Application Goal: DSA approval of construction documents for a replacement or rehabilitation - for compliance with structural, fire life safety & accessibility building standards DSA Review: • Regional Office • DSA Plan Approval letter

  31. Phase 4:Project Application Required Submittals: • All standard requirements apply • Design phase consultation with DSA encouraged Plus, for Rehabilitation projects: • Evaluation & Design Criteria Report approved by the DSA • Cost Estimate for seismic rehabilitation work & code required upgrades

  32. General Procedures Tracking: use PTN & DSA A# Communication: DSA approval letters Processing Timelines: Phase & project specific, based on workload Contact for inquiries: Masha Lutsuk (Masha.Lutsuk@dgs.ca.gov) Terence Fong (Terence.Fong@dgs.ca.gov)

  33. QUESTIONS?

  34. Seismic Mitigation ProgramFunding ApprovalOffice of Public School Construction

  35. Seismic Mitigation Program Subset of the Facility Hardship Program State Funding for Qualifying Repair Reconstruction Replacement

  36. Qualifying Seismic Factors Ground shaking Faulting Liquefaction Landslide

  37. Qualifying School Facility Eligible construction type Defined in School Facility Program regulations Confirmed by DSA Designed for occupancy by students and staff Facility demonstrates an unacceptable risk of injury to occupants in a seismic event

  38. Qualifying Project District must demonstrate: Unmet and ongoing need for pupil housing Site and/or Facility pose an unacceptable risk of injury in a seismic event Construction contracts signed on or after May 20, 2006

  39. Structural Deficiencies District must obtain: Eligibility Evaluation Report Determines the potential risk of collapse Structural Engineer’s Report Identifies the minimum mitigation work required DSA Letter of Concurrence

  40. Site Deficiencies Potential for: Faulting Liquefaction Landslide Potential District must obtain: Geological professional report Outlines the minimum mitigation work required CGS Letter of Concurrence

  41. SiteDeficiencies Site issue must be affecting an eligible building Building eligibility is determined by DSA

  42. Types of Requests Two types of requests: Conceptual Funding

  43. OPSC Application Process Seismic Project ConceptualApplication FundingApplication SAB Approval SAB Approval

  44. Conceptual Application District has obtained Eligibility Evaluation Report Structural and/or geological professional’s report District does not yet have DSA-approved plans

  45. Conceptual Application Required Documents: Facility Hardship Request Sheet (Recommended) Structural Engineer’s Report DSA concurrence letter(s) States that the building(s) meets SMP qualifying criteria Concurs with the industry specialist’s report on minimum mitigation work

  46. Conceptual Application Required Documents: Geological Report with CGS concurrence letter (if applicable) Detailed Cost Estimate of minimum work required Cost benefit analysis of rehabilitation vs. replacement Photos Site Diagram

  47. Conceptual Approval Preliminary approval by the SAB After a conceptual approval: 18 months to submit funding application, or 24 months to submit funding application if the project includes site acquisition

  48. Conceptual Approval There is no bond authority or place on the unfunded list reserved for Conceptually Approved applications.

  49. FundingApplication Required Documents: Application for Funding (Form SAB 50-04) DSA Final Plan Approval Letter DSA approved plans CDE Final Plan Approval Letter Career Technical Education Letter Site Development Worksheet (if applicable)

  50. FundingApplication Required Documents: If Site Acquisition is included: CDE final site approval letter Site Development Worksheet Required Real Estate Documents Real Estate questions contact: Alan Shoemaker at (916) 376-5359 or Alan.Shoemaker@dgs.ca.gov Samuel Smith at (916) 375-6726 or Samuel.Smith@dgs.ca.gov

More Related