1 / 9

Heavy Flavor Averaging Group

Heavy Flavor Averaging Group. David Kirkby UC Irvine. http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/ http://belle.kek.jp/mirror/hfag/. Brief History. HFAG is successor to LEP/SLD/CDF heavy-flavor working-groups.

ayame
Télécharger la présentation

Heavy Flavor Averaging Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group David Kirkby UC Irvine http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/ http://belle.kek.jp/mirror/hfag/

  2. Brief History • HFAG is successor to LEP/SLD/CDF heavy-flavor working-groups. • Established at May 2002 FPCP conf. as natural transfer of primary responsibility to Babar & Belle. • Lesson from history [t(Bs) from 1994 Moriond/LaThuile]: reliable averages require careful attention to methodology.

  3. HFAG Mission • Primary mission: provide averages of “heavy flavor” (Bd,Bs) quantities for major conferences (summer/winter) and PDG. • Secondary: • standard reporting of analysis details • develop & maintain averaging tools • build community consensus on methodology • develop new ways to summarize complex averages

  4. Organization CERN (flavour) KEK, SLAC (flavor) b-hadron lifetimes B oscillations DGs Vcb Vub B time-dependent Semileptonic decays Unitarity triangle Rare decays

  5. Methodology I • Types of uncertainty & correlations handled: stat. syst1. syst2. syst3. syst4. … stat. syst1. syst2. syst3. syst4. … measurement B measurement A

  6. Methodology II • Assume that systematics correlated between measurements are due to unknown value of some external globally defined parameter. • E.g., B lifetime used to determine B oscillation frequency.

  7. Methodology III • Approximate (n+1)-dim. likelihood with n-dim. likelihood, assuming external constraint on global param. more precise than internal constraint.

  8. Issues • Cannot handle statistical correlations (e.g., due to sample overlaps). • Cannot combine multidim. results (e.g., simultaneous t-Dm) • How to combine measurements of same quantity made with different theoretical assumptions? (e.g., DG).

  9. Looking Ahead • Convened task force to make recommendations on Dalitz analysis. • Created new WG on b->c decays. • Writeup of HFAG methodology & results on track for winter conferences. • Involved in CKM2005 workshop.

More Related