140 likes | 258 Vues
In this analysis, I explore the effects of using different lenses (1.8 and 3.5) in various lighting conditions (indoor and outdoor) with a focus on exposure levels—regular, underexposed, and overexposed. I share my personal preference for the 35mm lens, noting its aperture advantages for depth of field. Additionally, I critique four images based on composition and exposure, highlighting the use of leading lines, composition challenges, and adherence to the rule of thirds. This discussion aims to provide insights for photographers working with different lens specifications and exposure settings.
E N D
PPR2 Kurt Morton
Questions • Explain which of the lenses you prefer to use as your regular lens. • I prefer the 35mm lens, because I like that it has a bigger aperture allowing more depth of field effects. • What did you find useful and frustrating about setting exposure using “A”? • I liked being able to choose the aperture. The annoying part was that it took longer. • Looking at your four different subjects, write a small critique about each image noting its composition and exposure qualities. • The first picture is interesting because it uses lines and interesting angles. It is exposed properly. • The second image is too busy because the rest of the mural makes it hard to focus on the subject. • The third image uses a blurry foreground to give you a sense of depth. It also has strong lines in the picture. The normal exposure is a bit overexposed. • The fourth picture uses rule of thirds, as the fire hydrant is off center. Also, the regular exposure is underexposed, probably because there is a lot of light coming from the top right of the picture.