1 / 4

Page 1 /4

4rd Update draft-ietf-softwire-4rd IETF 87 Softwire WG March July 30, 2013 Sheng Jiang (speaker) Rémi Després Reinaldo Penno Yiu Lee Gang Chen Maoke Chen. Page 1 /4 . Conclusions from 6man in IETF 86. In IETF86, 6man has given clear verdict

ayasha
Télécharger la présentation

Page 1 /4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 4rd Updatedraft-ietf-softwire-4rdIETF 87 Softwire WGMarch July30, 2013Sheng Jiang (speaker)Rémi Després Reinaldo Penno Yiu Lee Gang Chen Maoke Chen Page 1/4

  2. Conclusions from 6man in IETF 86 In IETF86, 6man has given clear verdict 4rd cannot get reserved IID range, the reserved IID registry may be closed completely 4rd can specify its own rules to form its 64-bit IID. But it is opaque out of 4rd domain draft-ietf-6man-ug “Significance of IPv6 Interface Identifiers” gives clearances: "Specifications of forms of 64-bit IID MUST specify how all 64 bits are set ", and "the whole IID value MUST be viewed as an opaque bit string by third parties, except possibly in the local context. " 4rd needs to develop a mechanism for duplicated IID/Addr test

  3. 4rd Tag Specifications • 4rd Tag in IID • an identifier to distinguish 4rd packet from native-IPv6 packets • A 16-bit tag, (0x0300) at the beginning of 64-bit IID (64~79 bits of whole address) • This design gives the minimum collusion chance between 4rd addresses and any existing also future IPv6 addresses • 4rd-capable CE SHOULD always prohibit all addresses that use its advertised prefix and have IID starting with 0x0300 (4rd Tag), by using DAD

  4. Comments are welcomed! This document is ready for WGLC Thank You!

More Related