1 / 8

14 th RPF Resolution #6

COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Management of Industry Documentation Road Pavement Forum 6 & 7 May 2008 Rob Lindsay. 14 th RPF Resolution #6.

azalia-kemp
Télécharger la présentation

14 th RPF Resolution #6

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC)Management of Industry DocumentationRoad Pavement Forum6 & 7 May 2008Rob Lindsay

  2. 14 th RPF Resolution #6 “That an RPF task group be established under the leadership of Elzbieta Sadzik and Rob Lindsay to discuss a new structure and a way forward for the COTO Road Materials Committee.”

  3. COTO Technical Subcommittees • Historic Mandate • Facilitate technology transfer amongst road authorities • Collate state of the art technology and practice • Develop national standards • Produce / revise relevant TRH and TMH (E Sadzik)

  4. RPF Task Group • Workshop on 18 February 2008 • Present • E Sadzik • M Henderson • B Verhaeghe • I McDonald • L Sampson • T Distin • L Kannemeyer • R Lindsay

  5. RPF Task Group • Workshop Agenda • Problem Statement • RMC functions • Membership of RMC • RCB Task Group proposed COTO structure • Road Engineering Academy • Austroads and AASHTO approach • RMC – the future

  6. RPF Task Group • Discussion (Industry Documentation) • RMC mandate implicitly withdrawn • No vertical integration (RCC and COTO) • Difficulty with national funding • Absence of approval mechanism • Aggravating factors • Diminishing expertise in the State Road Authorities • MTC and RNMS

  7. RPF Task Group • Proposal (Industry Documentation) • Support Formation of RECB • Transfer RMC document mandate to RECB • Vertical integration (RCB and/or COTO) • RECB compete for funding from DST • Broad representation • Private and public sectors • Special Interest Groups (RMC) • State, Metro, and Local Authorities • Approval mechanism?

  8. RPF Task Group • Proposal (Industry Documentation) • RCC technical disciplines accommodated • Road Prism, Pavement Layers, Minor Structures, Geometric Design. • RCC technical disciplines not accommodated • Road Network Management, Major Structures, Survey, Construction.

More Related