1 / 29

CONGRESSIONAL SAMPLES FOR APPROXIMATE ANSWERING OF GROUP-BY QUERIES Swarup Acharya

CONGRESSIONAL SAMPLES FOR APPROXIMATE ANSWERING OF GROUP-BY QUERIES Swarup Acharya Phillip Gibbons Viswanath Poosala ( Information Sciences Research Center, Bell Labs, New Jersey ) Divya Rao. Outline. Introduction Background Aqua System Problem Formulation Solutions

azana
Télécharger la présentation

CONGRESSIONAL SAMPLES FOR APPROXIMATE ANSWERING OF GROUP-BY QUERIES Swarup Acharya

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CONGRESSIONAL SAMPLES FOR APPROXIMATE ANSWERING OF GROUP-BY QUERIES Swarup Acharya Phillip Gibbons Viswanath Poosala (Information Sciences Research Center, Bell Labs, New Jersey) Divya Rao

  2. Outline • Introduction • Background • Aqua System • Problem Formulation • Solutions • Query Rewriting strategies • Experiment • Conclusion

  3. Introduction • Group-by queries- most important class of queries in decision support systems. • Congressional Samples- A hybrid union of uniform and biased samples • Seek to propose techniques for obtaining fast, highly-accurate answers for Group-by queries

  4. Background • Uniform random sampling is not effective for group-by queries. • Ex: A group by query on the US Census database to determine the per-capita income of every state. • Huge discrepancies in the sizes of different groups like California is 70 times more populated than Wyoming. • This leads to poor accuracy of answers of those groups which have fewer number of tuples than the larger ones as accuracy is highly dependent on the number of sample tuples that belong to that group.

  5. Background • Uniform Random Sampling are more appropriate only when the utility of data to the user mirrors the data distribution • Multi-table query: When different data have equal representation but their utility to the user is skewed • Ex: Data warehouses where the usefulness of data degrades with time • This means the approximate sample has to collect more samples from the recent data which cannot be achieved through uniform random sample over the entire warehouse.

  6. Biased Sampling • Use precomputed samples to address the problem of unbiased query • Advantages of using precomputed biased samples: • Queries can be answered without accessing the original data at query run time • Storing queries in disk blocks avoids the overhead of random scanning • Disadvantage: Biased samples must commit to the sample before seeing the query. Hence not suitable for user controlled progressive refinement.

  7. Aqua System • Aqua is an efficient decision support system providing approximate answers to queries

  8. Aqua System(Contd.) • Aqua is a Middleware tool that can sit atop any DBMS managing a data warehouse • Aqua maintains statistical summaries of data in Synopses and uses them to answer queries • The aqua system provides probabilistic error/ confidence bounds on the answer

  9. Aqua System(Contd.)

  10. Aqua System(Contd.)

  11. Problem Formulation • Main aim is to provide accurate answers to group-by queries in an approx. query answering system • If ci and ci' be the exact and apprx. aggregate values in the group gi. Then error is the percentage relative error ε in the estimation of ci is ε = ( ci – ci' )/ci * 100

  12. Solutions • Theorem: Divide the sample space X equally among the groups and take uniform random sample within each group. • Map this theorem to various classes of group-by queries with arbitrary mixes of groupings. • Ex: US Congress HOUSE SENATE

  13. House • The House has representatives from each state proportional to the state's population • Applying theorem T to the House we have, • For the aggregate operation, the quality of approx. answers increases with the query selectivity • Answers to the queries with the same aggregate and equal selectivities will typically have similar quality guarantees.

  14. Senate • Senate has equal number of representatives from each state • Applying the theorem to the Senate we have, • Each group in the sample will have atleast as many sample points as any other group in the entire sample

  15. Problems with House and Senate • Using Samples from House would result in very few sample points for smaller groups • Senate allocates fewer tuples to the larger groups compared to the House. • Hence we have another technique called the “Congress”-collect both the House and the Senate samples

  16. Basic Congress • Apply the theorem to the aggregate queries containing group-by queries on a set of attributes and queries with no group-bys at all. • Collect both the House and Senate samples • Reduce this factor by 2

  17. Congress • For the sample space X, the final sample size allocated to each group is given by, • Where the expected sample space allocated to g is

  18. Query rewriting • Scaling up the aggregate expressions • Deriving error bounds on the estimate • Generating unbiased answers using tuples in the biased sample: • Scale factor is the inverse of sampling rate

  19. Rewriting Strategies • The key step in scaling is to efficiently associate each tuple with its corresponding scale factor • a) Store the scale factor with each tuple • i) Integrated Rewriting • ii) Nested-integrated Rewriting • b) Use a separate table to store the scale factor • iii) Normalized Rewriting • iv) Key-normalized Rewriting

  20. Experiments Experimental Testbed: Aqua system with Oracle v7 as the back-end DBMS Experimental Parameters

  21. Experiment(Contd.) • Study to identify a scheme that can provide consistently good performance

  22. Performance of various allocation strategies • Performance of Different query sets: • Queries with no group-bys: House performs well Congress technique performs consistently the best for queries of all types • Queries with three group-bys: Senate has low errors • Queries with two group-bys:Both senate and House perform poorly in this case • Congress performs close to best for queries of all types. Other techniques perform well only in a limited part of the spectrum

  23. Performance of different sample sizes: • The errors in Congress drop as the sample space increases

  24. Performance of group count: • Integrated and Nested-integrated perform better than Normalized and Key-normalized due to the absence of a join operation • Nested-integrated performs better than Integrated due to significantly fewer multiplications.

  25. Conclusions • Demonstrated that uniform samples are not enough to accurately answer all group-by queries • Proposed new techniques based on biased sampling • Congressional sampling concept was introduced and the sampling strategies were validated experimentally to produce accurate estimates to group-by queries and in their execution efficiency • All the techniques have been incorporated into the Aqua System.

  26. Questions??

More Related