1 / 12

Distinguished Dissertation Fellowship Rating Rubric:

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the Distinguished Dissertation Fellowship, detailing five distinct ratings: Low, Good, Very Good, High, and Very High. Each rating is accompanied by a comprehensive rationale that provides insight into the expectations for dissertation quality. The rubric emphasizes the importance of scholarly contribution, research originality, and academic rigor, offering clear guidelines for assessors. Understanding these criteria is essential for prospective fellows aiming to achieve a high rating in their dissertation submissions.

azura
Télécharger la présentation

Distinguished Dissertation Fellowship Rating Rubric:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Distinguished Dissertation FellowshipRating Rubric: There are five ratings as follows: Low Good Very good High Very high

  2. Rationale for “Low” Rating

  3. Rationale for “Good” Rating

  4. Rationale for “Very good” Rating

  5. Rationale for “Very good” Rating(Continued)

  6. Rationale for “High” Rating

  7. Rationale for “High” Rating(Continued)

  8. Rationale for “Very high” Rating

  9. Rational for “Very high” Rating(Continued)

  10. Evaluation Criteria

  11. Program Responsibility

  12. Program Responsibility(continued)

More Related