1 / 19

5. EUROPEAN UNION POLICIES (II): THE REGIONAL POLICY

5. EUROPEAN UNION POLICIES (II): THE REGIONAL POLICY. 1.- OBJECTIVES AND PRINCIPLES 2.- STRUCTURAL FUNDS 3.- COHESION FUNDS. OBJECTIVES AND PRINCIPLES. OBJECTIVES TREATY OF ROME

azure
Télécharger la présentation

5. EUROPEAN UNION POLICIES (II): THE REGIONAL POLICY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 5. EUROPEAN UNION POLICIES (II): THE REGIONAL POLICY 1.- OBJECTIVES AND PRINCIPLES 2.- STRUCTURAL FUNDS 3.- COHESION FUNDS

  2. OBJECTIVES AND PRINCIPLES OBJECTIVES TREATY OF ROME • To reduce the disparities in the degree of development of the different regiones and the delaye of the less favoured regions SINGLE EUROPEAN ACT - Economic and social cohesion TREATY OF THE UNION (1992) • Creation of the Cohesion Fund

  3. OBJECTIVES AND PRINCIPLES • The Treaty of Rome foresaw the creation of the European Social Fund (ESF) • The regional disparities increased after the enlargements: Ireland and United Kingdom (1971), Greece (1981), Spain and Portugal (1986) • Necessity of a Regional Policy • Creation of the Structural Funds

  4. STRUCTURAL FUNDS 1.-EFRD: European Fund for Regional Development 2.-ESF: European Social Fund 3.-EAGGF: European Agricultural Guarantee and Guidance Fund- Guidance Section 4.-FIFG: Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance After 1993: • Integration of all the structural interventions in a global strategy against unemployment and in the promotion of less favoured regions.

  5. STRUCTURAL FUNDS OBJECTIVES (1988-1993 and 1994-1999) • OBJECTIVE 1 PROMOTE DEVELOPMENT AND THE STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT IN THE LESS DEVELOPED REGIONS • OBJECTIVE 2RECONVERSION OF THE REGIONS AFFECTED BY INDUSTRIAL DECLINE • OBJECTIVE 3 REDUCE THE UNEMPLOYMENT OF LONG DURATION • OBJECTIVE 4FACILITE THE ADAPTATION OF THE WORKERS TO THE INDUSTRIAL CHANGE • OBJECTIVE 5PROMOTE THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT • AACCELERATE THE ADAPTATION OF AGRARIAN STRUCTURES • BFACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT IN THE RURAL AREAS

  6. OBJECTIVE 1 (2000-2006) • SCOPE: NUTS II regions with GDP per person lower than the 75% of the EU average (1994/96) • List of the regions decided and approved by the European Commission • 22% of the EU population • 69.7% of the funds (136 billions of EUROS)

  7. OBJECTIVE 2 (2000-2006) • Total Coverage = 18% of the EU population • 11.5% of the Funds (22.5 billions of EUROS) • Regions under economic reestructuration • Indicative coverage of 4 kind of areas (all the EU) : • Industrial and Services areas (10%) • Rural areas (5%) • Urban areas (2%) • Fisheries dependent areas (1%) • Transition period of 6 years for regions that have lost their elegibility

  8. OBJECTIVE 3 (2000-2006) • All regions not supported by Objective 1 • Reference framework for all the actions relative to the human resources inside a MS • 12.3% of the Funds (24 billion of EUROS) • Adaptation and modernization of the education, formation and employment systems: • Accompanying the economic and social changes • Education and formation systems for all whole life • Active labor market policy against unemployment • Promotion of social integration and equal opportunities

  9. Distribution of resources between structural funds (2000-2006) • 69.7% for Objective 1 (incl. Lost of obj.) • 11.5% for Objective 2 (incl. Lost of obj.) • 12.3% for Objective 3 • 5.35% for Community Initiatives • 0.40% for Innovative Actions • 0.25% for Technical Assistance • 0.5% for FIFG ot of Objective 1

  10. Eligible regions 2000-2006

  11. Structural Funds: Distribution among MS and Objective for 2000-2006 Total Obj 1 Obj 2 Million EUROS (1999)

  12. Population inside Objective 1 regions during 2000-2006 Inhabitants Member state

  13. Maximum of popularion under Objective 2in each MS during 2000-2006

  14. COHESION FUND • It was created in 1994 • OBJECTIVES • To search the economic and social cohesion of the EU • Scope: MS whose GNP per capita < 90% UE average Main destination of the funds • Environmental projects • Transport infrastructures of common interest • Previous reports • Technical assistance and related reports

  15. The future of cohesion funds • Maintaining the elegibility criteria: • For countries whose GNP per capita is less than 90% of the EU average • For projects in the sectors of envrionment and transport • Distribution between MS: • Spain61-63% • Portugal16-18% • Greece16-18% • Ireland 2-6%

  16. SUMMARY • Europe is not just a custom union; there are some common policies that make a big effort indefining global goals for the whole Community. • A balanced development an convergence between regions are main European objectives. • The impact of these policies of some results in the redistribution of income among countries. • However, the enlargement has widened tha number of elegible regions and the potential benefitiary population … • …but the budget restrictions (1.27% GDP) could limit the future development of these policies

More Related