1 / 12

Team #2 Kite Project Presentation London Beefeaters

Team #2 Kite Project Presentation London Beefeaters. Arjun Kumar, John Behler , Jack Scott, Jake Glotzbach. Team Members + roles. Jack Scott- drafter, co-builder John Behler - researcher, project coordinator Arjun Kumar- kite designer, flight coordinator

badrani
Télécharger la présentation

Team #2 Kite Project Presentation London Beefeaters

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Team #2 Kite Project PresentationLondon Beefeaters Arjun Kumar, John Behler, Jack Scott, Jake Glotzbach

  2. Team Members + roles • Jack Scott- drafter, co-builder • John Behler- researcher, project coordinator • Arjun Kumar- kite designer, flight coordinator • Jake Glotzbach- builder, co-designer

  3. Overview • We will present to you the process of kite building • How we decided on a kite to build • The steps that went in to designing and building the kite

  4. Preliminary research • Wanted a kite for recreational use, ease of flying • Needed to be constructed with given materials • Light, yet rugged and large • Sustain flight • Low wind=no problem • SAFE!

  5. decision • Decision was between dragon, delta, diamond, box kites • We used matrices regarding: use for a task, suitability for a task, resource management, technology feasible, cost, safety • Suitability and safety carried most weight as we would be flying around a crowd

  6. Delta it is • Delta kite best fit our expectations • We then began further research on delta kites • Drafted rough designs, determined final design • Followed this design roughly, but we made some changes http://www.idesignkites.com/content/ kitegallery/delta_kite_plan.html

  7. Our design

  8. results

  9. Action shot

  10. reflection • Kite flew well, assuming no wind • Generated life, was rugged • Did not break until multiple test trials • We can assume that it would maintain flight with more wind than we had • Nobody got hurt=safe

  11. Conslusion • problem was no wind • Solution is fly in more wind next time • Problem was stability, unbalanced • Solution make kite more symmetrical in aspect of weight • Proposal for best kite possible • Smaller for less weight= better low wind flight • More rugged front • Balanced laterally

  12. credits • http://www.idesignkites.com/content/kitegallery/delta_kite_plan.html • This is where we obtained our general plan

More Related