1 / 27

EU Funded Research on Statistics and Indicators

Explore the importance of evidence-based policies backed by solid statistical methodologies in EU-funded research on indicators. Discover the impact of statistical research on economic and social policies.

barksdale
Télécharger la présentation

EU Funded Research on Statistics and Indicators

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EU Funded Research onStatistics and Indicators Dr Ian Perry DG Research and Innovation

  2. EU Funded Research onStatistics and Indicators The European Union needs good policies Policy should be evidence based The evidence is often indicators Indicators are built from statistics Official statistics need to be based on solid methodologies Resulting from metholodological research

  3. EU Funded Research onStatistics and Indicators Economic and social research also needs to be evidence based The evidence is often indicators

  4. EU Funded Research onStatistics and Indicators Under the Seventh Framework Programme for Research (FP7), Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities Theme, Indicators Activity, DG Research and Innovation funds three types of statistical research: How indicators are used for policy New and improved indicators Official statistics methodology

  5. EU Funded Research onStatistics and Indicators Five research projects funded under the FP7 Indicators activity have sessions at this conference: AMELI (Advanced Methodologies for European Laeken Indicators) BLUE-ETS (BLUE – Enterprise and Trade Statistics) POINT (Policy Influence of Indicators) RISQ (Representativity Indicators for Survey Quality) SAMPLE (Small Area Methods for Poverty and Living Condition Estimates)

  6. EU Funded Research onStatistics and Indicators Building on the work done under the FP6 EUKLEMS (Productivity in the European Union: a Comparative Industry Approach) research project FP7- SSH has or will fund research on: Economic Datasets WIOD (World Input-Output Database) Intangibles COINVEST (Competitiveness, Innovation and Intangible Investment in Europe) INNODRIVE (Intangible Capital and Innovation: Drivers of Growth in the EU) Services INDICSER (Indicators for Evaluating International Performance in Service Sectors) SERVICEGAP (The Impact of Service Sector Innovation and Internationalisation on Growth and productivity)

  7. EU Funded Research onStatistics and Indicators New and Improved Indicators EURO - JUSTIS (Scientific indicators of confidence in justice: tools for policy assessment) InnoS&T (Innovative S&T Indicators Combining Patent Data Surveys: Empirical Models and Policy Analyses) ASSPRO (Assessment of patient payment policies and projection their efficiency, equity and quality effects; the case of Central and Eastern Europe) BEYOND GDP

  8. EU Funded Research on Statistics and Indicators The Infrastructures part of FP7 also has 2 types of projects relevant to the European Statistical System under the Social Sciences part of ESFRI (European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures) roadmap: Providing Datasets for Researchers European Social Survey SHARE (Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe) Data archiving and Enhancing Researchers Access to Official Microdata DWB (Data without Boundaries) Many other research projects funded under the FPs produce some statistics and indicators DG Research and Innovation is itself a heavy user of Science, Technology, Innovation and many other statistics coming from the ESS

  9. EU Funded Research onStatistics and Indicators Beyond FP7 No decisions have yet been made either on budgets or themesfor the Common Strategic Framework for Research and Innovation On 9/2/2011 DG Research and Innovation launched a major consultation exercise in connection with preparing the Common Strategic Framework for Research and Innovation

  10. Green PaperTowards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

  11. Proposing major changes to future EU research and innovation funding Bringing together the FP, CIP and EIT into a Common Strategic Framework Standardising the rules Simplification (single entry points, common IT platforms, etc) For the next EU Budget (to start in 2014) Seeking stakeholder views ahead of the Commission’s formal proposals (to be presented by end 2011) On the proposed changes On the priorities and design of the Common Strategic Framework What is the Green Paper?

  12. Objectives of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth Headline targets, including 3% of GDP invested in R&D Includes the Innovation Union Flagship initiative A strategic and integrated approach to research and innovation (from research to market, all forms of innovation) Putting in place the key conditions to make Europe attractive for research and innovation Common focus to address major societal challenges and aiming at competitiveness and jobs Endorsed by February European Council (Heads of State) The context: Europe 2020 strategy

  13. Innovation gap with US and Japan, emerging countries catching up EU Percentage gaps between EU performance (0) and other countries across 12 indicators. Other counties, such as India and Brazil, are developing fast. Source: Innovation Union Scoreboard

  14. EU R&D investment is lagging behind our main competitors Evolution of World R&D expenditure in real terms, PPS€ at 2000 prices and exchange rates, 1995-2008

  15. The rationale for a Common Strategic Framework

  16. Enables cross-border poolingof resources to achieve critical mass and diffusion of knowledge Promotes competition in research, thereby raising levels of excellence Offers a wide range of training possibilities and enhances Europe’s research capacity Provides a way to deal with pan-European policy challenges and link to EU market frameworks Raises the international attractiveness of EU research and innovation Positive benefits from FP7(interim evaluation and other sources)

  17. Complexity - too many instruments and funding mechanisms, complex landscape Further simplification- less variation in rules, simpler audits and controls, avoid duplicate information Better strategy for innovation – how to commercialise results, generate impacts Need to focus resources – with critical mass to address the grand challenges Broaden participation – new Member States, women Clearer agendas - driven by scientific, industrial, social objectives But concerns about FP7 and other programmes (interim evaluations and other sources)

  18. Bringing together The 7th Framework Programme for research, technology development and demonstration The Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme The European Institute for Innovation and Technology And strengthening complementarities with the Structural Funds Scope of the Common Strategic Framework

  19. Simplifying the programmes: FROM different rules in each programme and initiative TOmore standardised rules across all initiatives FROM a large number of funding schemes within and between programmes TOa rationalised toolkit of schemes that are common to all programmes FROM multiple websites, guidance documents, applications TOcommon entry points, one stop shops, common IT platforms Why a Common Strategic Framework (1)?

  20. Greater impact: FROM fragmented calls where projects cannot go from one stage to the next (R&D, demonstration, market take up, etc) TO support for projects and organisations from research to market FROM research results sitting on the shelf TO stronger support across the whole innovation cycle FROM different priorities in each programme and initiative TO common strategic priorities, focusing on societal challenges, competitiveness and research excellence. Why a Common Strategic Framework (2)?

  21. Summary of questions in the Green Paper

  22. How can a Common Strategic Framework make EU funding more attractive and easy to access? How to cover the full innovation cycle: research to market? Where to act at EU level (and leverage other resources)? How to support joint programming between Member States? What between large vs small projects? What balance between standardisation vs flexibility in the rules? What measures of success? How to complement national, regional and Cohesion Policy funding? Delivering on Europe 2020

  23. How to focus on societal challenges? What scope for bottom up activities? What support for policy making and forward-looking activities? Role of the Joint Research Centre? How to involve citizens? Tackling societal challenges

  24. How to take account of non-technological innovation? How to strengthen industry participation, including public private partnerships? What support for SMEs? Use of open schemes to support innovation? Use of financial instruments (equity, debt)? New types of support (public procurement, prizes)? Treatment of Intellectual Property Rights? Strengthening competitiveness

  25. Stronger role for the European Research Council? EU support to improve Member State policies? Greater support to mobility and research careers (Marie Curie actions)? EU level support to research infrastructures? Priorities for international cooperation? Addressing obstacles to the European Research Area? Strengthening the science base and the European Research Area

  26. Addressed to all stakeholders: Key questions for design of the Common Strategic Framework Deadline for contributions by 20 May 2011: Online questionnaire Submission of position papers Interactive blog Next steps: Major event to conclude consultation (10 June 2011) Commission proposals for next multi-annual financial framework Commission legislative proposals for the Common Strategic Framework (by end of 2011) A broad debate – next steps

  27. Thank you for your attention Find out more and participate in the debate at: http://www.ec.europa.eu/research/csfri/ Ian.Perry@ec.europa.eu

More Related