SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Tips for improving citations

barney avatar
18 diapositives · 364 Views · Jul 22, 2014

Tips for improving citations. 2 nd Bibliometrics in Libraries Meeting Clari Gosling, 12 th Sept 2013. Questions to start with. What is a citation? Why do authors cite?. Why are things cited?. Justification of a statement/strengthen an argument A void plagiarism

Tips for improving citations - slide 1
01 / 18Tips for improving citations
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Tips for improving citations
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Tips for improving citations 2nd Bibliometrics in Libraries Meeting Clari Gosling, 12th Sept 2013

  2. Questions to start with • What is a citation? • Why do authors cite?

  3. Why are things cited? • Justification of a statement/strengthen an argument • Avoid plagiarism • Show idea development/build on previous work • Provide further information • Provide counter argument – controversy • Provide historical overview of subject • Establish trust/credibility • Literature review is the accepted way of working • They’re what everyone else cites/key papers • Cite “out of area” to demonstrate inter-disciplinarity • To get into “citation ring”/encourage citations of you • The author cited you previously • Requested by reviewer/editor for publication

  4. In Summary • Authors cite a work because: • It is relevant (in some way) to what they’re writing • They know it exists

  5. Information overload • Updated daily, Scopus covers 50 million abstracts of over 20,500 peer-reviewed titles from more than 5,000 publishers • The average time a researcher spends browsing and reading literature in 9.3 hours per week

  6. Is this relevant?

  7. Findability • Your article needs to show up in search results • Title • Abstract • Keywords • Then it has to hook them in • Introduction • Conclusions • Figures & graphs

  8. Search Engine Optimisation • Headings • Links • Image & table captions • Author information • Increasingly takes account of social media mentions too

  9. Where to publish • Think about journal rankings • Inclusion in Scopus and Web of Science • Terms and conditions of publishing - do you need to publish Open Access as a requirement of your funder? • Green and gold OA • Author pays model • Cost effectiveness of OA http://www.eigenfactor.org/openaccess/ • Reputation – some OA journals are considered predatory http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/

  10. Self-citations • Often excluded from citation statistics • But show how your work is developing • Has been studies that show that the more you cite yourself, the more others cite you • “Controlling for numerous sources of variation in cumulative citations from others, our models suggest that each additional self-citation increases the number of citations from others by about one after one year, and by about three after five years. ” • Fowler, J. & Aksnes, D. Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics, September 2007, Volume 72, Issue 3, pp 427-437

  11. International collaborations

  12. Author profiles • Why? • Claim your research • Add extra information (website, photo, keywords) • Allow readers to browse your work easily • Where? • ORCID • Scopus • ResearcherID • Google Scholar

  13. ORCID • Registry of researchers linking to their outputs • Publisher Independent • Embedding your ORCID in published papers allows readers to find you even if you’ve moved institution • Links to Scopus & ResearcherID so don’t have to enter all your details multiple times http://orcid.org/

  14. Academic social networking sites • Allow you to network with your peers and share your research • Some have the ability to ask and answer research related questions, create groups or share references • Often rank highly in Google and other search engines • Can make your publications available to download (where allowed within t&c of publication) • Talk to colleagues and find out what they’re using • Examples: • Academia.edu; ResearchGate; Mendeley

  15. Social Media • “If you tell people about your research, they look at it. Your research will get looked at more than papers which are not promoted via social media” • Michelle Terras at UCL blogged and tweeted about already published research and saw an increase in downloads from their institutional repository • http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2012/04/19/blog-tweeting-papers-worth-it/

  16. Useful intro to using social media in academia • Bik HM, Goldstein MC (2013) An Introduction to Social Media for Scientists. PLoSBiol 11(4): e1001535. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001535 • http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001535

  17. Things to do • Step 1 publish your research & think about people finding it • Step 2 claim your research & create a profile • ORCID • ResearcherID • Scopus Author Profile • Google Scholar • Step 2b • Profile on an “academic social networking site” egResearchGate, Academia.edu, Mendeley • Step 3 engage & publicise • Create your own website • Blog • Twitter • Google+ • Facebook groups • Wikipedia links • Slideshare • Youtube • LinkedIn • Publisher community sites

  18. The Open University LibraryWalton HallMilton KeynesMK7 6AA www.open.ac.uk/library clari.gosling@open.ac.uk