1 / 17

Ultra-peripheral Collisions at RHIC Spencer Klein, LBNL for the STAR collaboration

Ultra-peripheral Collisions at RHIC Spencer Klein, LBNL for the STAR collaboration. Ultra-peripheral Collisions: What and Why Interference in Vector Meson Production Au + Au --> Au + Au + r 0 r 0 production with nuclear excitation Direct p + p - production & interference

barr
Télécharger la présentation

Ultra-peripheral Collisions at RHIC Spencer Klein, LBNL for the STAR collaboration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ultra-peripheral Collisions at RHICSpencer Klein, LBNL for the STAR collaboration Ultra-peripheral Collisions: What and Why Interference in Vector Meson Production Au + Au --> Au + Au + r0 r0 production with nuclear excitation Direct p+p- production & interference e+e- pair production Conclusions Results

  2. Au g, P, or meson Au Coupling ~ nuclear form factor Coherent Interactions • b > 2RA • no hadronic interactions • Ions are sources of fields • photons • ~ Z2 --> very high fluxes • Pomerons or mesons (mostly f0) • A 2 (bulk)-A 4/3 (surface) • Fields couple coherently to ions • P < h/RA, ~30 MeV/c for heavy ions • P|| < gh/RA ~ 3 GeV/c at RHIC

  3. VM g Production occurs in/near one ion gs Za ~ 0.6; is Ng > 1? Specific Topics • Vector meson production gA -- > ’ r0, w, f, J/y,… A • Production cross sections --> s(VN) • Vector meson spectroscopy (r*, w*, f*,…) • Wave function collapse • Vector Meson superradiance • Electromagnetic particle production gg -- > leptons,mesons • Strong Field QED • Za ~ 0.6 • meson spectroscopy Ggg • Ggg ~ charge content of scalar/tensor mesons • particles without charge (glueballs) won’t be seen • Mutual Coulomb excitation (GDR & higher) • Luminosity measurement, impact parameter tag e+e-, qq,...

  4. Au g qq Au r0 Exclusive r0 Production in STAR • One nucleus emits a photon • The photon fluctuates to a qq pair • vector meson dominance --> treat as vector meson • The pair scatters elastically from the other nucleus • also Photon- meson contribution • qq pair emerges as a vector meson • s is large: 380 mb for Au at 130 GeV/nucleon • 5% of hadronic cross section • 120 Hz production rate at RHIC full energy/luminosity

  5. No Interference Interference r0 pT (GeV/c) Interference • 2 possibilities • Interference!! • Similar to pp bremsstrahlung • no dipole moment, so • no dipole radiation • 2-source interferometer • separation b • r,w, f, J/y are JPC = 1- - • Amplitudes have opposite signs • s ~ |A1 - A2eip·b|2 • For pT << 1/b • destructive interference

  6. Entangled Waveforms e+ J/Y • VM are short lived • decay before traveling distance b • Decay points are separated in space-time • no interference • OR • the wave functions retain amplitudes for all possible decays, long after the decay occurs • Non-local wave function • non-factorizable: Yp+ p- Yp+Yp- • Example of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox e- + b J/Y 0 - (transverse view)

  7. A typical STAR event200 GeVnucleon cm)

  8. Analysis Approach • Exclusive Channels • r0 and nothing else • 2 charged particles • net charge 0 • Coherent Coupling • SpT < 2h/RA ~100 MeV/c • back to back in transverse plane • Nuclear breakup possible • Backgrounds: • incoherent photonuclear interactions • grazing nuclear collisions • beam gas

  9. Exclusive r0 r0 PT • Trigger on low-multiplicity events • back-to-back topology • ~ 7 hours of data • prototype trigger • 2 track vertex • in interaction diamond • non-coplanar, q < 3 rad • reject cosmic rays • track dE/dx consistent with p • No neutrons in ZDC • peak for pT < 2h/g ~ 100 MeV/c • p+p+ andp-p- model background Preliminary M(p+p-)

  10. Nuclear Excitation • Multiple Interactions are possible • P(r0, b=2R) ~ 0.5% • P(2GDR, b=2R) ~ 30% • Factorization should hold • Diagram on rt. should dominate • Au* decay mostly by neutron emission Au* Au g g r0 P Au Au*

  11. ‘Minimum Bias’ Dataset r0 PT • Trigger on >1 neutron signal in both zero degree calorimeters • ~800,000 triggers • Event selection same as peripheral • no ZDC cuts • p+p+ andp-p- model background • phase space in pT • small Preliminary M(p+p-)

  12. p- r0 p+ g p+ g gA -- > p+p- A gA -- > r0A -- > p+p- A Direct p+p- production p- • Direct p+p- is independent of energy • The two processes interfere • 1800 phase change at M(r0) • changes p+p- lineshape • good data for gp --> ppp (HERA + fixed target) • poor data for gA • p+p- fraction should decrease as A rises

  13. Fit Data r0 p+p- r0 lineshape ZEUS gp --> (r0 + p+p- )p STAR gAu --> (r0 + p+p- )Au Preliminary Fit all data to r0 + p+p- interference is significant p+p- fraction is high (background?) Set =0 for STAR

  14. A peek at gg --> e+e- Blue - all particles red - e+ e- pairs p • ‘Minimum bias dataset • 2 track Q=0 vertex • Find electrons by dE/dx • p< 140 MeV/c • Select identified pairs • pT peaked at 1/<b> dE/dx (keV/cm) e P (GeV/c) Preliminary Events Pt (GeVc)

  15. Conclusions • For the first time, we have observed three peripheral collisions processes • Au + Au -- > Au + Au + r0 • Au + Au -- > Au* + Au* + r0 • Au + Au -- > Au* + Au* + e+e- • We see interference between r0 and direct p+p- • Peripheral collisions is in it’s infancy • next year: more data, more triggers, more luminosity,more energy, more channels, more acceptance, more... • The r0 pT spectrum is sensitive to whether particle decay triggers wave function collapse

More Related