1 / 8

iSTAR: Changes at the Human Subjects Division

iSTAR: Changes at the Human Subjects Division. Karen Moe, Director With the support and commitment of over 40 HSD staff members and over 100 IRB members. iSTAR at HSD: An integrated framework. Communication, education, and outreach Process improvement (Efficiency, consistency, transparency)

Télécharger la présentation

iSTAR: Changes at the Human Subjects Division

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. iSTAR:Changes at the Human Subjects Division Karen Moe, Director With the support and commitment of over 40 HSD staff members and over 100 IRB members

  2. iSTAR at HSD: An integrated framework • Communication, education, and outreach • Process improvement (Efficiency, consistency, transparency) • Performance metrics • Cultural change

  3. Example: Maximize use ofregulatory flexibility to identify research that doesn’t require IRB review Impact • IRB application & review not required • Saves researchers time and resources • Faster research startup • More efficient use of HSD and IRB resources

  4. Example: (continued) Already accomplished • Public data sets, some biol. specimens: no review Pending (spring 2009) • Coded data, more biol. specimens: no review • HSD staff training: recognize & return unnecessary applications Pending (fall 2009) • Reduced need for “dual” review

  5. Example: Regularly publish turn-around times for different types of IRB review Impact • Faster research startup due to better planning, better able to achieve targeted startup dates • More efficient use of researcher resources & funding • Increased accountability and transparency

  6. Example: (continued) Already accomplished • Infra-structure: database, basic metrics & reports Pending (March 2009) • Post basic turn-around times for IRB applications Pending (summer 2009) • Post more detailed turn-around time metrics Pending (two years) • Research Roadmap Initiative: a Research Portal and Database providing application status to researchers

  7. Example: Reduce turn-around time for review and approval of IRB applications Impact • Faster research startup • Faster access to research funding • More efficient use of researcher, HSD, and IRB resources

  8. Example: Already accomplished

More Related