1 / 13

Central Valley Water Transfers Southern California Water Dialogue

Central Valley Water Transfers Southern California Water Dialogue. Steven P. Hirsch Transfer & Exchanges Program Manager Metropolitan Water District September 28, 2005. Metropolitan Water District. Factors Affecting Transfer Needs Service area demands

basil
Télécharger la présentation

Central Valley Water Transfers Southern California Water Dialogue

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Central Valley Water TransfersSouthern California Water Dialogue Steven P. Hirsch Transfer & Exchanges Program Manager Metropolitan Water District September 28, 2005

  2. Metropolitan Water District Factors Affecting Transfer Needs • Service area demands • Availability of member’s local supplies • Availability of CRA and SWP supplies

  3. Demands on Metropolitan

  4. Colorado River Aqueduct Supplies

  5. State Water Project Supplies

  6. Surplus/Shortage Outcomes 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 Acre-feet -500,000 -1,000,000 -1,500,000 5% 0% 100% 94% 88% 78% 73% 62% 57% 42% 26% 21% 10% 83% 68% 52% 47% 36% 31% 16% Exceedence Probability

  7. North Kern& Mojave Demo Kern Delta Prop. 13 Programs (start-up) 3.0 San Bernardino Valley DiamondValley Lake Greater than 10x Increase 2.0 SemitropicCastaic & PerrisNo. Las Posas ArvinEdison Millions Acre-Feet 1.0 Desert /Coachella Lake MathewsLake Skinner ’90 ’95 ’00 ’05 Year Metropolitan’s Storage Capacity

  8. Public Affairs Program DVL Take Take from Semitropic, Arvin-Ed. Cut REPL Deliveries Contractual GW Take Take from Monterey Res. Extraordinary Conservation Call Water Transfer - Options Contracts Buy Spot Water Allocation Plan Shortage Actions Shortage Stages Actions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Potential Simultaneous Actions

  9. Western Canal W.D. GCID Richvale I.D. Placer County Water Agency Sac. Valley SettlementContractors 11 Districts 146,230 AF 2003 Sacramento Valley Water Transfers February Call • 76,232 AF March Call • 49,998 AF May Call • No call for water • 20,000 AF

  10. Western Canal W.D. GCID Richvale I.D. 3 Districts 125,000 AF 2005 Sacramento Valley Water Transfers April Call w/ option to Extend to May Call

  11. Value of a Late Call:2005 Transfers May 2 Second Call Date April 1 Initial Call Date Jan 15 Purchase Options 100 80 • Foregooption? • Exercise option? 60 NorCal precipitation (%) • Forego option? • Exercise option? • Extend option? 40 20 0 January February March April May Average Northern California Precipitation1921-2003 (Oct – Sept)

  12. 1,500,000 1,000,000 March 2005 500,000 February 2005 0 Acre-feet October/November 2004 -500,000 -1,000,000 -1,500,000 5% 0% 100% 94% 88% 83% 78% 73% 68% 62% 57% 52% 47% 42% 36% 31% 26% 21% 16% 10% Exceedence Probability Value of a Late Call (Con’t)

  13. Summary • MWD’s storage and conservation investments reduce need for transfers • Transfers are not needed every year • Transfers = insurance against drought • Prefer options with late call dates • Transfers are not “risk free” • Transfers require hard work

More Related