1 / 18

Non-standard lessons from the 'tragedy of the commons’: From systems to intersecting processes

Non-standard lessons from the 'tragedy of the commons’: From systems to intersecting processes Peter Taylor Univ. Massachusetts Boston Critical & Creative Thinking Science, Technology & Values Education for Sustainability peter.taylor@umb.edu www.faculty.umb.edu/pjt. Classroom

bauere
Télécharger la présentation

Non-standard lessons from the 'tragedy of the commons’: From systems to intersecting processes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Non-standard lessons from the 'tragedy of the commons’: From systems to intersecting processes Peter Taylor Univ. Massachusetts Boston Critical & Creative Thinking Science, Technology & Values Education for Sustainability peter.taylor@umb.edu www.faculty.umb.edu/pjt

  2. Classroom activity

  3. From Systems to Intersecting Processes

  4. Social and environmental change are analyzed as something produced by intersecting economic, social and ecological processes operating across different scales. These processes transgress boundaries and restructure "internal" dynamics, thus ensuring that socio-environmental situations do not have clearly defined boundaries and are not simply governed by coherent, internally-driven dynamics.

  5. 1. Intersecting processes involve inseparable dynamics 2. The account represents agency as distributed across different kinds of agents and scale. 3. The account has an intermediate complexity. 4. Intermediate complexity accounts favor the idea of multiple, smaller engagements linked together within the intersecting processes. 5. Intersecting processes accounts highlight the need for trans-disciplinary work grounded in particular locations. 6. Intermediate complexity preserves a role for some kind of social scientific generalization.

  6. Syllabus topics: systems -> intersecting processes Constructions of nature Conservation and early C20 colonialism, patriarchy, and eugenics Post-WW II ecology: systems and selfishness Human ecology: adapted or ambiguous? Nomadic pastoralism: a key subject of research and of development Local knowledge: adapted, flexible, or vulnerable? Political ecology: economics intersects with ecology Insights from understanding peasantries Construction of commodities and the gendered politics of production in agroecology Euro-centric environmentalism and coercive conservation The politics of participation in eco-development The collaborative generation of environmental knowledge and inquiry Theory and discourse: difficulties and ironies

More Related