1 / 27

CS 451 / 558

CS 451 / 558. Week 4, Tue. Scoring an alignment. Let: x k := the kth letter of x y k := the kth letter of y. Input : string x , length m string y , length n (both from alphabet S [ACGT]) scoring matrix s , s.t. s ( a,b ) := the score of aligning a to b gap penalty g

bayard
Télécharger la présentation

CS 451 / 558

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CS 451 / 558 Week 4, Tue

  2. Scoring an alignment Let: xk:= the kthletter of x yk:= the kthletter of y Input: string x, length m string y, length n (both from alphabet S [ACGT]) scoring matrix s, s.t.s(a,b) := the score of aligning a to b gap penalty g S = 0 # the score for (i=0; i<m; i++) if (Si or Ti is a gap character) S -= g else S += s(xi ,yi)

  3. Finding an optimal alignment Dynamic Programming • Looks like a merger of the 2D dotplot array and the alignment scoring

  4. Finding an optimal alignment Dynamic Programming • Looks like a merger of the 2D dotplot array and the alignment scoring • But it’s actually more than that

  5. Finding an optimal alignment Dynamic Programming • a recursive definition of the optimal score

  6. a recursive definition of the optimal score the optimal solution depends on • optimal solutions to subproblems of the same form • local calculations based on those solutions • e.g. score for alignment of x and y • Can only end one of three ways: • xm aligned to yn • xm aligned to nothing (ynalready used) • yn aligned to nothing (xmalready used) S = S(m-1,n-1) + s(xm,yn) S = S(m-1,n) + g S = S(m,n-1) + g

  7. a recursive definition of the optimal score the optimal solution depends on • optimal solutions to subproblems of the same form • local calculations based on those solutions • e.g. score for alignment of x and y • Can only end one of three ways: • xm aligned to yn • xm aligned to nothing (ynalready used) • yn aligned to nothing (xmalready used) • generally S = S(m-1,n-1) + s(xm,yn) S = S(m-1,n) + g S = S(m,n-1) + g

  8. Finding an optimal alignment Dynamic Programming • a recursive definition of the optimal score

  9. Finding an optimal alignment Dynamic Programming • a recursive definition of the optimal score

  10. Finding an optimal alignment Dynamic Programming • a recursive definition of the optimal score • a dynamic programming matrix for remembering optimal scores of subproblems

  11. a dynamic programming matrix for remembering optimal scores of subproblems

  12. Finding an optimal alignment Dynamic Programming • a recursive definition of the optimal score • a dynamic programming matrix for remembering optimal scores of subproblems • a bottom-up approach of filling the matrix by solving the smallest subproblems first

  13. a bottom-up approach of filling the matrix by solving the smallest subproblems first move me

  14. Scoring an optimal alignment Input: strings x & y, lengths m & n scoring matrix s, s.t.s(a,b) := the score of aligning a to b gap penalty g S0,0 = 0 # the score for (i=0; i<m; i++) initialize Si,0 for (j=0; j<n; j++) initialize S0,j for (i=0; i<m; i++) for (j=0; j<n; j++) Si-1,j-1 +s(xi ,yi), Si,j = max Si,j-1 – g , Si-1,j– g

  15. Finding an optimal alignment Dynamic Programming • a recursive definition of the optimal score • a dynamic programming matrix for remembering optimal scores of subproblems • a bottom-up approach of filling the matrix by solving the smallest subproblems first • a traceback of the matrix to recover the structure of the optimal solution that gave the optimal score

  16. Global alignment vs local alignment

  17. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 3 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 3 0 8 10 4 0 8 6 0 2 0 0 2 4 0 2 0 5 12 0 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 6 0 18 0

  18. Global alignment vs local alignment

  19. local alignment Input: strings x & y, lengths m & n scoring matrix s, s.t.s(a,b) := the score of aligning a to b gap penalty g S0,0 = 0 # the score for (i=0; i<m; i++) initialize Si,0 for (j=0; j<n; j++) initialize S0,j for (i=0; i<m; i++) for (j=0; j<n; j++) Si-1,j-1 +s(xi ,yi), Si,j = max Si,j-1 – g , Si-1,j– g 0

  20. Score matrix P(xi , yj| model of homology)

  21. Score matrix P(xi , yj | model of homology) P(xi , yj | model of nonhomology)

  22. Score matrix f (xi , yj) * f (xi) f (yj) ** * From alignments of trusted homologs ** Observed frequencies in large database of repr. seqs

  23. Score matrix f (xi , yj) * s(xi , yj)= log f (xi) f (yj) ** * From alignments of trusted homologs ** Observed frequencies in large database of repr. seqs

  24. Score matrix BLOSUM PAM VTML … f (xi , yj) * s(xi , yj)= log f (xi) f (yj) **

  25. Score matrix f (xi , yj) * s(xi , yj)= log f (xi) f (yj) **

  26. Gap penalties Usually ad hoc What works well with the chosen score matrix Linear / affine gap penalties Affine = geometric length distribution

More Related