30 likes | 180 Vues
PP 49-2 Summary table. PP 49-2 Proposed Resolution for states. PR#S1 : SDF shall be unnamed when the procedure is promulgated with a chart having a continuous descent path and a dist/alt table to MAPt/RW.
E N D
PP 49-2 Proposed Resolution for states PR#S1: SDF shall be unnamed when the procedure is promulgated with a chart having a continuous descent path and a dist/alt table to MAPt/RW. PR#S2: SDF should be preferably named when the procedure is promulgated with a chart having a continuous descent path or a dive and drive profile and without a dist/alt table to MAPt/RW. PR#S3: IFPP should consider an amendment to the PANS OPS to request the publication of a distance/Altitude table to MAPt/RW for all “LNAV approaches”.
PP 49-2 Proposed Resolution for Navigation Database Suppliers PR#NDB1: Navigation Database supplier should not code unnamed SDF in their NDB when the chart includes a dist/alt table to MAPt/RW. PR#NDB2: Navigation Database supplier should code named SDF in their NDB. PR#NDB3: Navigation Database supplier should code unnamed SDF in their NDB when the chart doesn’t include a dist/alt table to MAPt/RW. PR#NDB4: Navigation Database supplier should consider an ARINC 424 amendment to reflect PR#NDB1, PR#NDB2 and PR#NDB3 resolutions.