1 / 41

花鯽魚籠具之入口設計在漁獲效率上的影響 : 於北海道松島野外實驗

Effects of entrance design on catch efficiency of arabesque greenling traps: a field experiment in Matsumae, Hokkaido. FISHERIES SCIENCE 2006., 72 : 1147–1152. 花鯽魚籠具之入口設計在漁獲效率上的影響 : 於北海道松島野外實驗.

baylee
Télécharger la présentation

花鯽魚籠具之入口設計在漁獲效率上的影響 : 於北海道松島野外實驗

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Effects of entrance design on catch efficiency of arabesque greenling traps: a field experiment in Matsumae, Hokkaido FISHERIES SCIENCE 2006.,72 :1147–1152 花鯽魚籠具之入口設計在漁獲效率上的影響:於北海道松島野外實驗 Yong LI,1 Katsutaro YAMAMOTO,1* Tomonori HIRAISHI,1 Katsuaki NASHIMOTO2 AND Hiroyuki YOSHINO3 Reporter:陳 湘 蕎

  2. Introduction trap entrance factors trap entrance Traps widely used in fisheries Entrance number Shape Size Location. factors factors factors simple structure convenient operation

  3. Purpose • The effects of trap entrance inclination angel and funnel length on the catch per trap. • The body length distribution of fish caught in traps. • And the mean body length of fish caught in traps.

  4. Introduction 學名:Pleurogrammus azonus 英名:Arabesque greenling 中文名:鄂霍次克魚 、花鯽魚(俗名:星斑六線魚或遠東六線魚) 日文:ホッケ(ho tsu ke)

  5. Materials and methods Study time: 2002 June~July Study sites: Matsumae, Hokkaido, Japan Temperature: surface temperature16.9 ~17.8。C Depth: 128~140 m Fig. 1 Location of the fishing experiment.

  6. Materials and methods Table 1Details of set time, hauling time, soak time, location, water depth and surface temperature during the five samplings in 2002.

  7. Materials and methods • The traps were conical in shape • Top diameter 73 cm • Bottom diameter 87 cm • Height 30 cm. • α: Inclination angle • Lf :The entrance funnel length • Bait: Sardines (approx. 200g) 73cm 30cm 87cm Experimental trap Commercial trap

  8. Commercial trap E4 trap

  9. Materials and methods－ Fish traps: 40 fish traps Commercial traps 20 Experimental traps 20(E1, E2, E3, E4；five traps of each type) Table 2 Dimensions of the trap entrances

  10. Results Catch Catch analysis of traps

  11. Catch

  12. Results Total of trap hauls:200 Total of fish:2200 Catch ﹛ Experimental traps:1017 Commercial traps:1183

  13. CPUE and number of traps hauled Ct, commercial trap; Ei, trap Ei (i = 1, 2, 3, 4); SD, standard deviation. Table 3 Mean catch number per trap and number of traps hauled

  14. E1, E2, E3 and Commercial trap Kruskal–Wallis test Soak time 2 days CPUE of traps Soak time 1 day CPUE of traps

  15. Soak time 1 day CPUE 1. Trap E2、commercial trap、 trap E1 ＞trap E3. Table 3

  16. Soak time 2 days CPUE difference 1. Commercial trap and trap E3 2. Trap E2 andtrap E3 The overall mean CPUE was shown as trap E2>the commercial trap>trapE1>trap E3.

  17. E1, E2, E3 and Commercial trap Kruskal–Wallis test Soak time1 day CPUE of traps Soak time 2 days CPUE of traps Significant differences

  18. Trap E2 α=270 Ct α=370 Trap E1 α=460 Trap E3 α=00 Fig. 3 The relationship between the overall mean catch per trap (number) and entrance inclination angle.

  19. Trap E4 and the commercial trap Mann– Whitney test Soak time 2 days CPUE of traps Soak time1 day CPUE of traps

  20. Soak time 1 day CPUE TrapE4>Commercial trap Table 3

  21. Soak time 2 days CPUE No significant difference Table 3

  22. Trap E4 and the commercial trap Mann– Whitney test Soak time 2 days CPUE of traps Soak time1 day CPUE of traps TrapE4>Commercial trap No significant difference

  23. Bycatch species－11 species • Octopus(章魚) • Hairy triton(法螺) • Hermit crab(寄居蟹) • Cod(鱈類) • Sculpins • Fat greenling • Yellow body rockfish • Slime flounder • White-edged rockfish • Kurosoi rockfish • Angry rockfish

  24. Catch analysis of traps Mean body length Body length frequency distributions

  25. Mean body length Table 4 Mean body length (mm) of fish caught in each trap during the sampling period E1, E2, E3 and commercial trap Soak time of 1 day and 2days No significant differences

  26. Mean body length Table 4 Mean body length (mm) of fish caught in each trap during the sampling period Trap E4 and the commercial trap Soak time of 1 day No significant difference Significant difference Soak time of 2 days

  27. Body length frequency distributions ANOVA tests E1, E2, E3 and commercial Soak time of 1 day or 2 days No difference

  28. E1, E2, E3 and Commercial trap Soak time=1day Soak time=2day Fig. 4 Size frequency distributions of the body length of fish in each 10-mm body length size class, caught using the experimental traps (E1, E2, and E3) and the commercial trap (Ct).

  29. Body length frequency distributions Trap E4 and the commercial trap Soak time=1day Not differ Soak time=2day Fig. 5 Size frequency distributions of the body length of fish in each 10-mm body length size class, caught by the experimental trap (E4) and the commercial trap (Ct).

  30. Discussion • Modification of the funnel design may significantly affect trap performance Max • α increased, the overall mean CPUEfirst increased to a maximum, and then gradually decreased. Fig. 3 The relationship between the overall mean catch per trap (number) and entrance inclination angle.

  31. The catch efficiency of trap E2 was highest, followed by the commercial trap, E1, and E3. • Trap E2 symmetrical funnel and the funnel • opening is located in the middle of the trap. • The symmetrical funnel can be considered to • be easier for fish to enter the trap than the unsymmetrical funnel.

  32. To inclination angle point of view…… • The trap E2 entrance is most effective in catching arabesque greenling, • since it is easier for fish to enter the trap than other shaped entrances. • The authors therefore recommend the application of a trap with an • entrance similar to the symmetrical funnel.

  33. To funnel length point of view…… The results confirmed that the funnel length of trap entrance affects the catch of a trap.

  34. The interior volume of trap affected the catchperformance…… • For a trap with shorter funnel length Consequence of a lower probability of fish escaping The catch efficiency was increased

  35. According to the results of catch analysis…… • The inclination angle and funnel length of entrance had no effect on size selectivity of the trap. (soak time of 1 day) Because the size of funnel opening of the experimental trap and commercial trap was about the same.

  36. In conclusion…… When used in a commercial arabesque greenling trap fishery: 1)Trap E2 (α = 27°, Lf = 22 cm) produced higher catches than the commercial trap (α = 37°, Lf = 22 cm) 2)Trap E4 (α = 37°, Lf = 8 cm) caught more fish than the commercial trap over a 1-day soak time.

  37. It is suggested…… It is suggested that the inclination angle of entrance of a commercial trap should be adjusted from 37° to approximately 27°.

  38. Other Studies

  39. Thank you for your attention~

More Related