1 / 16

Teaching and Learning Mathematics

Teaching and Learning Mathematics. How did we get to where we are?. Sputnik -- 1957. Led to the Woods Hole Conference Chaired by Jerome Bruner Sooner is Better!! Clashed with Piaget. History after Woods Hole. 1960 – Meaningful Math (New Math)

bburks
Télécharger la présentation

Teaching and Learning Mathematics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Teaching and Learning Mathematics How did we get to where we are?

  2. Sputnik -- 1957 • Led to the Woods Hole Conference • Chaired by Jerome Bruner Sooner is Better!! Clashed with Piaget

  3. History after Woods Hole • 1960 – Meaningful Math (New Math) Not only do we need to know math, we need to be fluent math theorists! • 1980 – Back to the Basics Test scores have fallen, it’s a direct result of a lack of understanding the basics

  4. History continued • 1989 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Standards Teaching, Curriculum, Assessment • Adopted Constructivism • reasoning, • problem solving, • communication, • representation

  5. The Time Line of Mathematics Instruction 1900 1930 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 |________|________|________|_______|_____|________> <---Behaviorism--><-Bruner-><-Piaget---><Info Processing> Drill & practice, Meaningful New Constructivism learning assoc- math math, iations Spiral Curriculum

  6. Timss — Trends in International Math and Science Study • 13-year-olds from the U.S. are scoring substantially lower in mathematics than students from Korea, Ireland, Spain, and the United Kingdom • second International Assessment of Education Progress -1991, U.S. Students were outperformed by Korean, Swiss, and Taiwanese students in every area of mathematics

  7. TIMMS continued • U.S. students are outperformed by French and Hungarian students in four out of five areas tested. • 13-year-old American students outperformed only Luxembourg, Nigeria, and Swaziland • 2006 data – no change

  8. NAEP – National Assessment of Education Progress – Since 1969 • 1 in 5 4th and 8th Graders is proficient in mathematics • 1/3 of 4th graders are below basic (lowest level) • 1% of 8th graders were proficient in Algebra, Geometry and basic functions

  9. No Child Left Behind • 1) to institute high academic standards for all students, and • 2) to insure that there are 'highly qualified' teachers in every U.S. classroom

  10. NCLB cont. • Content Standards. • Annual Testing. Ninety-five percent of all students in grades 3 – 8 must undergo annual testing in mathematics and reading.

  11. NCLB cont. • Every Child’s Test Score. NCLB requires that every student be tested (only very minor exceptions exist for severe mentally or physically handicapped students) and that every child reach proficiency by 2014. (if subgroup fails, the whole school fails)

  12. NCLB cont. • Sanctions. By 2014 every American student who is tested (100%) must demonstrate Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in reading and mathematics After five years of inadequate test score gains, a school falls into the “reconstitution” category. Such a fate results in dismissing the school’s teachers and administration and closing the school.

  13. NCLB cont. • Highly Qualified Teachers Licensed in the area they teach Understand the content Gifted teachers

  14. What do we need to do in order to compete in math internationally? • Look at mathematics differently • Teach it Differently • Require students to solve problems to learn algorithms • Focus on Problem solving not mechanics

  15. NCTM 2000 Six Features of the New Standards - 2000 • Equity – high expectations for all students to study and learn mathematics • Curriculum – coherent, well-organized learning that integrates mathematics ideas • Teaching – understanding what students know and need to learn and using effective pedagogical strategies

  16. 4. Learning – actively building conceptual understanding and proficiency 5. Assessment – ongoing and routine enhancement of student learning and teacher instruction 6. Technology – normal and expected support for effective mathematics teaching and learning

More Related