SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Challenges in Educating Culturally Diverse Children in Urban America

bcatalano avatar
21 diapositives · 266 Views · Jan 01, 2020

Explore demographic changes, racial distributions, challenges, and the role of communities in educating culturally diverse children in urban settings.

Challenges in Educating Culturally Diverse Children in Urban America - slide 1
01 / 21Challenges in Educating Culturally Diverse Children in Urban America
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Challenges in Educating Culturally Diverse Children in Urban America
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Power point Presentation Robert Clark CURR 580 Cultural Competency

  2. Urban Education: Challenges in Educating Culturally Diverse Children • By Min Zhou

  3. “Demographic Changes in Urban America” • Stagnant growth in White Population (3%) • Moderate growth in Black Population (21%) • Rapid Growth in Hispanic (61%) and Asian (69%) Population

  4. Racial / ethnic population unevenly distributed and most concentrated in certain geographical and urban areas • Black population (South – 54%; Midwest – 19%; Northeast – 18%; West- 10%) • White population (South – 34%; Midwest – 25%; Northeast 20%; West – 21%)

  5. Hispanic population ( West – 43.4%; South 32.8%; Northeast 14.9%; Midwest – 8.9%) • Asian population (West 48.9%; Northeast – 20.7%; South 18.8%; Midwest – 11.7%) • Ethnic populations mostly located in big cities ( i.e. New York, Chicago, Los Angeles)

  6. Diversity among ethnicities • 48% of Hispanics identify themselves as White • Among Hispanics - 58% are Mexican; 9.6% are Puerto Rican; 3.5% are Cuban • A new group of Latinos immigrating from Central and South America ( i.e. Dominican Republic, El Salvador, etc.) • Hispanics from South America and Cuba are more educated and have lower rates of poverty

  7. Among Asians: Chinese and Filipinos are the largest group, followed by Asian Indians, Koreans, the Vietnamese, and the Japanese • Compared to Hispanics, Asians are better educated and more affluent

  8. Residential Segregation • Levels remain about the same • “Whites live with Whites” • Minorities are mostly in metropolitan areas • “Black – White segregation remains very high in metropolitan areas with the highest Black populations” • “Asian – White and Hispanic – White segregation relatively low when compared to Black – White segregation”

  9. Characteristics of children’s population in America • 27% of U.S. population is under 18 • Among children, racial diversity is more pronounced • 44% of children in urban areas are Black, Hispanic, or Asian • Proportion of White children in urban areas is dropping • Segregation = less opportunity to interact with other racial groups in school, social clubs, etc.

  10. “Challenges of Educating Culturally Diverse Children in Urban America” • Challenge not for children to reach parent’s social status, but to advance into the middle class • Education / skills needed to get there • In attaining high school diploma, 2nd generation minorities doing better than 1st or 3rd ( except for Mexicans) • Mexican children fail to “drop in”; need to work

  11. 2nd generation’s college attendance also better • Need for greater skills and education with less low skill jobs available

  12. Concentration of poverty • Minorities, immigrants, poor concentrated in cities • “disadvantaged communities” ( isolation from mainstream, ghettos, unsafe streets, overcrowded schools, drop out rates) • Middle class suburban child vs. poor urban child ( supports, stereotypes, willingness to buy into mainstream values)

  13. Children of immigrant parents ( two working parents, less supervision, on the streets) • Language issues ( children translating for parents; children lacking English proficiency and literacy)

  14. Role of Communities • Does the community create resources to overcome disadvantages or do they let the problem get worse? • Study looking at Chinatown, Koreatown, and Pico – Union in Los Angeles • Three factors: 1) variety of community organizations ( i.e. libraries, playgrounds, churches, non – profit, private ethnic businesses) 2) density of organizations 3) organizations connections to children and the community

  15. Koreatown’s success • Variety and density of ethnic churches • Role of private organizations servicing the educational needs of children • Interconnection of Korean businesses (i.e. opportunities for the working class, interaction of middle class with working class in social settings

  16. Limitations of Chinatown and Pico - Union • Ethnic organizations less diversified • Less interconnection • Growth of Chinese middle class • Pico – Union businesses owned by Koreans and Hispanics

  17. Advantages of Coethnic Businesses • Attract variety of coethnic residents including the middle class • Presence of Korean middle class = 1) more diversified, thriving businesses 2) opportunities for Korean children to attend language, SAT, and music schools 3) interaction of classes in church and social settings

  18. Hispanic students vs. Asian students • Common neighborhoods and schools • Asian students performing better in school • Asian student’s access to after – school activities

  19. Importance of ethnic economy • “Density of commercial and social activities” • Improved conditions (i.e. investment, business opportunities) • Sense of community • Social control (i.e. Chinese teenager)

  20. “Density of privately owned educational institutions and businesses” • “Compensate for lack of public funds and facilities” • Academic and recreational programs • “Creation of job opportunities, role models, cultural – specific goods and services attracts middle class and tourists”

  21. Conclusion • “Government’s focus on improvement of enhancing school quality and classroom instruction” • Need to focus on social structures • “Bridge cultural gaps” • “Improve neighborhood organizations”