html5-img
1 / 18

Marco Olivieri 1 & Richard M. Allen 2 1) Istituto Naz. Di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Roma, Italy

Marco Olivieri 1 & Richard M. Allen 2 1) Istituto Naz. Di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Roma, Italy 2) SeismoLab, UCBerkeley, Berkeley, CA. A Simple and Rapid earthquake Detection and Discrimination System for ELARMS or A new conceptual schema for earthquake detection. Aim of the project.

beate
Télécharger la présentation

Marco Olivieri 1 & Richard M. Allen 2 1) Istituto Naz. Di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Roma, Italy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Marco Olivieri1 & Richard M. Allen2 1) Istituto Naz. Di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Roma, Italy 2) SeismoLab, UCBerkeley, Berkeley, CA A Simple and Rapid earthquake Detection and Discrimination System for ELARMSorA new conceptual schema for earthquake detection

  2. Aim of the project To develop a new earthquake detection algorithm Objective: • To speed-up the detection process • To reduce false detections • Peculiar attention to EEW systems

  3. Traditional approach “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” Why?

  4. Traditional approach (2) Because traditional phase associators do not know: • If the missing station is broken. • If not, when the pick for that station will be made available. i.e. Detection bases ONLY on the presence of picks in a certain time-window.

  5. Modern seismic networks • Status monitor: • active-down station (real-time flow monitors) • good ground motion signal (real-time PSD) • Latency monitor: • delay in data trasmission These can be updated in real-time

  6. A new concept • Assumption: If the network is reliable, all the operating stations in the surrounding of the epicenter will detect ground motion change and the picker will produce a P-wave detections with a a priori known delay If the network is reliable, we can look only at close stations

  7. Subnets We define the concept of subnet: A subnet is small network made by a master station + the five closest surrounding stations. (If the azimuthal coverage is not appropriate (> 180o) we replace some of the stations to enhance it) An earthquake is detected at a subnet when more than 3 stations produce a pick consistent with an hypocenter beneath the master station Or: for each earthquake we will have only one subnet centered above its epicenter

  8. Subnet examples • MGR subnet (left) • AOI subnet (right) this is the case of a “border” subnet (azimuthal gap > 200o)‏ • Each station belong to “its” subnet plus some of the surrounding ones

  9. Subnet update schema

  10. MTTG subnet Station lat lon distance azimuth latency MTTG 38.00 15.70 0. 14 MSCL 38.23 15.79 27.06 21.48 13 MPAZ 37.95 16.01 34.19 99.26 19 CEL 38.26 15.89 35.44 37.03 15 MSRU 38.26 15.50 35.60 323.7 13 SOI 38.07 16.05 39.73 78.80 11 Expected relative arrival time for substation: MSCL 3.7 3 MPAZ 5.1 10 CEL 5.2 6 MSRU 5.2 4 SOI 5.8 3 Side effect: The fourth pick is expected 6 +14 seconds= 20. This means that for a EEW we know that an alert can not be earlier than 20 seconds after the eq occurrence, i.e. the area that can not be protected has a radius of about 70km

  11. MTTG subnet Data Flow TIME 20080606213905 -1 TIME 20080606213906 -1 TIME 20080606213907 -1 TIME 20080606213908 -1 MTTG 20080606213909 20080606213855.730 TIME 20080606213909 -1 MSRU 20080606213910 20080606213900.840 TIME 20080606213910 -1 CEL 20080606213911 20080606213900.820 MSCL 20080606213911 20080606213859.430 SOI 20080606213911 20080606213901.300 TIME 20080606213911 -1 TIME 20080606213912 -1 TIME 20080606213913 -1 TIME 20080606213914 -1 TIME 20080606213915 -1 TIME 20080606213916 -1 MPAZ 20080606213917 20080606213857.020 MPAZ subnet Master matching pick Substation matching pick Step 1

  12. TIME 20080606213905 -1 TIME 20080606213906 -1 TIME 20080606213907 -1 TIME 20080606213908 -1 MTTG 20080606213909 20080606213855.730 TIME 20080606213909 -1 MSRU 20080606213910 20080606213900.840 TIME 20080606213910 -1 CEL 20080606213911 20080606213900.820 MSCL 20080606213911 20080606213859.430 SOI 20080606213911 20080606213901.300 TIME 20080606213911 -1 TIME 20080606213912 -1 TIME 20080606213913 -1 TIME 20080606213914 -1 TIME 20080606213915 -1 TIME 20080606213916 -1 MPAZ 20080606213917 20080606213857.020 TIME 20080606213905 -1 TIME 20080606213906 -1 TIME 20080606213907 -1 TIME 20080606213908 -1 MTTG 20080606213909 20080606213855.730 TIME 20080606213909 -1 MSRU 20080606213910 20080606213900.840 TIME 20080606213910 -1 CEL 20080606213911 20080606213900.820 MSCL 20080606213911 20080606213859.430 SOI 20080606213911 20080606213901.300 TIME 20080606213911 -1 TIME 20080606213912 -1 TIME 20080606213913 -1 TIME 20080606213914 -1 TIME 20080606213915 -1 TIME 20080606213916 -1 MPAZ 20080606213917 20080606213857.020 MTTG subnet Data Flow TIME 20080606213905 -1 TIME 20080606213906 -1 TIME 20080606213907 -1 TIME 20080606213908 -1 MTTG 20080606213909 20080606213855.730 TIME 20080606213909 -1 MSRU 20080606213910 20080606213857.840 TIME 20080606213910 -1 CEL 20080606213911 20080606213855.820 MSCL 20080606213911 20080606213855.030 SOI 20080606213911 20080606213856.300 TIME 20080606213911 -1 TIME 20080606213912 -1 TIME 20080606213913 -1 TIME 20080606213914 -1 TIME 20080606213915 -1 TIME 20080606213916 -1 MPAZ 20080606213917 20080606213857.020 MPAZ subnet 2 picks 1 pick Step 2, 2 seconds later

  13. TIME 20080606213905 -1 TIME 20080606213906 -1 TIME 20080606213907 -1 TIME 20080606213908 -1 MTTG 20080606213909 20080606213855.730 TIME 20080606213909 -1 MSRU 20080606213910 20080606213900.840 TIME 20080606213910 -1 CEL 20080606213911 20080606213900.820 MSCL 20080606213911 20080606213859.430 SOI 20080606213911 20080606213901.300 TIME 20080606213911 -1 TIME 20080606213912 -1 TIME 20080606213913 -1 TIME 20080606213914 -1 TIME 20080606213915 -1 TIME 20080606213916 -1 MPAZ 20080606213917 20080606213857.020 MTTG subnet Data Flow TIME 20080606213905 -1 TIME 20080606213906 -1 TIME 20080606213907 -1 TIME 20080606213908 -1 MTTG 20080606213909 20080606213855.730 TIME 20080606213909 -1 MSRU 20080606213910 20080606213857.840 TIME 20080606213910 -1 CEL 20080606213911 20080606213855.820 MSCL 20080606213911 20080606213855.030 SOI 20080606213911 20080606213856.300 TIME 20080606213911 -1 TIME 20080606213912 -1 TIME 20080606213913 -1 TIME 20080606213914 -1 TIME 20080606213915 -1 TIME 20080606213916 -1 MPAZ 20080606213917 20080606213857.020 MPAZ subnet 5 picks: event detected 3 picks not matching: Event killed Step 3, 4 seconds later

  14. Conclusions • enhance the rapid detection capability for a dense network of seismic stations in terms of: • Delay for the event declaration • False alert generated by sparse picks • give a real-time and punctual information for the detection delay of the forthcoming earthquake (a crucial input for EEW systems) the work is absolutely in progress

  15. Association Diagram

  16. example • TIME 20080606213901 -1 • TIME 20080606213902 -1 • TIME 20080606213903 -1 • TIME 20080606213904 -1 • TIME 20080606213905 -1 • TIME 20080606213906 -1 • TIME 20080606213907 -1 • TIME 20080606213908 -1 • MTTG 20080606213909 20080606213855.730 • TIME 20080606213909 -1 • MSRU 20080606213910 20080606213857.840 • TIME 20080606213910 -1 • CEL 20080606213911 20080606213855.820 • MSCL 20080606213911 20080606213855.030 • SOI 20080606213911 20080606213856.300 • TIME 20080606213911 -1 • TIME 20080606213912 -1 • TIME 20080606213913 -1 • TIME 20080606213914 -1 • TIME 20080606213915 -1 • TIME 20080606213916 -1 • MPAZ 20080606213917 20080606213857.020 Latency issue: If latency is not constant over the different stations (and usually it is not!) the first incoming trigger can belong to a station that is not closest one to the epicenter

More Related