1 / 8

Sweeping Lame DNS Delegations A Proposal

Sweeping Lame DNS Delegations A Proposal. DNS OPS SIG APNIC 15, Taipei, Taiwan 26 February 2003. Problem. 10-15% of all reverse DNS domains managed under APNIC are ‘lame’ Lame DNS increase traffic to DNS root servers Lame DNS inconveniences end users

beck-russell
Télécharger la présentation

Sweeping Lame DNS Delegations A Proposal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sweeping Lame DNS DelegationsA Proposal DNS OPS SIG APNIC 15, Taipei, Taiwan 26 February 2003

  2. Problem • 10-15% of all reverse DNS domains managed under APNIC are ‘lame’ • Lame DNS increase traffic to DNS root servers • Lame DNS inconveniences end users • Lame DNS inconveniences unrelated third parties • Fixing Lame DNS requires top-down coordination

  3. Proposal • APNIC uses domain: objects in whois to manage reverse DNS delegation • Changing domain object changes DNS • APNIC Secretariat is measuring and identifying lame DNS records already for statistical purposes • Proposed to add a ‘disable’ function to DNS zone generation • Mark Lame DNS domain: objects disabled • Notify Maintainer, permit re-enabling

  4. Details • 30 Day notice of LAME DNS status • Countdown timer • Countdown resets if DNS fixed • EMail to maintainer during 30 day window • At end, record marked disabled • Monthly reminder email to maintainer • Tests see ‘intermittent’ lame DNS • Only persistently lame disabled • Lame for 30 days or more

  5. Process to re-enable • Disable flag is extra Remark: field in domain object • To Re-enable, update whois domain: object to remove the Remark: field added by APNIC systems. • Domain object must meet normal DNS requirements when re-submitted • Minimum 2 nserver: entries, tested live

  6. Other RIRs • ARIN • Adopted similar mechanism, will be reviewed at ARIN-XI • LACNIC • Measure and record lame DNS daily, considering proposal to disable at next LACNIC meeting • RIPE-NCC • Measure only at this stage

  7. Reporting • Add standing report to DNS OPS SIG • Number of lame DNS records detected • Rate of disabling, re-enabling • Additional reports to IEPG, NANOG, SANOG etc • Coordination with other RIRs • May vary process timing, extend process • Review process in DNS-SIG • RIR and other modifications/proposals should be subject to DNS-SIG review

  8. Benefits of this proposal • Improved DNS services • Reduction of load on root DNS servers • Improved Internet connection times • Better logging of connections

More Related