Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation
Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement.Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien.Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.
F I N
Plus de contenu associé
Transcription de la présentation
Topic 7: Market Structures Agenda, Friday 26th November 2010 A: Supply and Perfect Competition B: Monopoly C: Perfect Competition v. Monopoly D: Oligopoly and Game Theory
Firm Supply • How does a firm decide how much to supply at a particular market price? (Firm’s supply curve) • This depends upon the firm’s • goals (e.g. π max, revenue max, zero π, … ); • technology (e.g. w, r, … ); • competitive environment/market structure.
Perfect Competition Assumptions • There are many buyers and sellers, • each seller is (or at least acts as) a price-taker • Homogeneous product • Freedom of entry and exit • Perfect information (consumers know all prices and producers know all input prices/costs)
The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision? • Assume each firm is a profit-maximizer • Therefore, each firm chooses its output level by solving: MR = MC But MR = P in perfect competition Therefore P = MC
The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision? P So a profit-maximizing supply level can lie only on the upwards sloping part of the firm’s MC curve. pe MCs(y) y’ ys* y
Perfect Competition: Equilibrium • Short run: (Excess, Abnormal, Supernormal, Economic) Profits or Losses (≤ TVC) possible • Short run → Long run: Profits attracts entry, market supply curve shifts to right, market price falls, zero economic profits in long run equilibrium • Short run → Long run: Losses “attracts” exit, …
Application: Tax Incidence In Perfect Competition P Market Supply PC This is the tax. PP Market Demand Q The tax creates a wedge between the price firms receive (Pp) and the price consumers pay (Pc). The difference is the tax (which goes to the tax authorities).
Application: Tax Incidence In Perfect Competition P Market Supply PC This is the tax PP Market Demand Q In the short run, the burden of the tax is shared (not necessarily on a 50/50 basis) between consumers and producers.
Application: Tax Incidence In Perfect Competition In the short run, • The producers receives less for the product. • Some firms will continue to produce output at a loss (once the reduced price is covering their average variable costs). • Some firms will experience “excessive” losses and so will exit the market. • The supply curve shifts to the left and the prices consumers and producers face increases.
Monopoly: Why? • Natural monopoly (economies of scale or density) - utility companies, e.g. electricity or natural gas or cable or rail (transmission) network, household waste collection • Statutory monopoly • a patent; e.g. a new drug • sole ownership of a resource; e.g. a toll bridge • Artificial monopoly, e.g. explicit formation of a cartel, e.g. OPEC
Monopoly: Assumptions • Many buyers • Only one seller i.e. not a price-taker • (Homogeneous product) • Perfect information • Restricted entry (and possibly restricted exit)
Monopoly: Equilibrium • Firm = Market • Short run equilibrium diagram = long run equilibrium diagram (apart from shape of cost curves and possibility of exit) • At qm, pm > AC therefore you have excess (economic, supernormal, abnormal) profits • Short run losses are also possible
Monopoly: Equilibrium MC The shaded area is the excess profit P AC Pm ym y Demand MR
Application: Tax Incidence in Monopoly • Claim When you have a linear demand curve, a constant marginal cost curve and a tax is introduced, price to consumers increases by “only” 50% of the tax, i.e. “only” 50% of the tax is passed on to consumers. (Similarly, if tax is eliminated, only 50% of price reduction is passed on to consumers.)
Economic Welfare • Consumer surplus measures (net) economic welfare from the buyer/consumers’perspective. • Producer surplus measures (net) economic welfare from the seller/producers’perspective.
Consumer Surplus • Consumer surplus is the amount a buyer is willing to pay for a product minus the amount the buyer actually pays. • Consumer surplus is the area below the demand curve and above the market price. A lower market price will increase consumer surplus (provided that the product is still supplied, of course). A higher market price will reduce consumer surplus.
Producer Surplus • Producer surplus is the amount a seller is paid for a product minus the total variable cost of production. A higher market price will increase producer surplus (provided that the product is still demanded, of course). A lower market price will decrease producer surplus. • Producer surplus is equivalent to economic profit in the long run.
Economic Welfare • Economic welfare is (generally) quantified as the sum of consumer surplus and producer surplus, i.e. equal weights are generally assumed. • Alternative relative weights are also possible.
Price A D Supply Consumer surplus Equilibrium price E Producer surplus Demand B C 0 Quantity Equilibrium quantity Consumer Surplus and Producer Surplus: Market Equilibrium
Monopoly v. Perfect Competition MC The monopoly output is less than the perfectly competitive output. P Pm (The monopoly price is higher than the perfectly competitive price.) Ppc Qm Qpc Q Demand MR
Monopoly v. Perfect Competition MC The green area represents the deadweight loss (triangle) of Monopoly P Pm Ppc Qm Qpc Q Demand MR
Oligopoly: Assumptions • Many buyers • Very small number of major sellers ( actions and reactions are very important) • Homogeneous product (usually, but not necessarily) • Complete information (usually, but not necessarily) • Restricted entry (usually, but not necessarily)
Oligopoly & Game Theory: Models • Cournot Competition (1838) (Bertrand Competition (1883)) • Nash Equilibrium (1950s): Game Theory • Oligopoly v. Perfect Competition v. Monopoly • Some examples of Games
1. Cournot Competition • Firms compete in quantities (q1, q2) • Real world examples? • q1 = F(q2) and q2 = G(q1) or more precisely q1 = F(q2e) and q2 = G(q1e) • Aim: Find q1and q2and hence P, i.e. find the equilibrium. • Example: P = a – bQ and Ci = cqi
2. Cournot Competition & Bertrand Competition: Nash Equilibrium Cournot Nash (q1, q2): Firms compete in quantities, i.e. Firm 1 chooses the best q1 given q2 and Firm 2 chooses the best q2 given q1 [Bertrand Nash (p1, p2): Firms compete in prices, i.e. Firm 1 chooses the best p1 given p2 and Firm 2 chooses the best p2 given p1] Nash Equilibrium (s1*, s2*): Player 1 chooses the best s1 given s2* and Player 2 chooses the best s2 given s1*
Connexion au compte
Connectez-vous pour publier votre contenu sur SlideServe.