1 / 52

Week 13: Journalism 2001

Week 13: Journalism 2001. December 6, 2010. Review of last week’s news. Hard News: (murders, city council, government, etc.) Major local stories Major national/international stories Major sports stories Soft News: (retirements, school programs, human interest) Local stories

belva
Télécharger la présentation

Week 13: Journalism 2001

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Week 13: Journalism 2001 December 6, 2010

  2. Review of last week’s news • Hard News: (murders, city council, government, etc.) • Major local stories • Major national/international stories • Major sports stories • Soft News: (retirements, school programs, human interest) • Local stories • National/international stories • Sports stories

  3. Words Matter!

  4. Is the other side better?

  5. A student contribution!

  6. Upcoming stories • Feature Story Assignment • Final article due: Next Monday, December 13 • Final eportfolio project: Due December 17 • Final Exam: December 17 • 6 p.m. • Humanities 484

  7. Let’s review:Organizing a feature story • Choose the theme • Do research, organize story around theme • Each section – beginning, body, end – revolve around theme • Narrow your theme • Has the story been done before? • The audience • Holding power • Worthiness

  8. Write the lead • Usually avoid summary leads • Tough to summarize feature in opening paragraph • Lead possibilities endless: • Narrative, contrast, staccato, direct address, etc. • Lead block: two or more paragraphs • Write the body • Vital information while educating, entertaining and emotionally tying reader to the subject • Provide background information

  9. Use a thread • Can be single person, event or thing that highlights theme of the story • Use transitions • Transitions hold paragraphs together and helps writers move from one person or area to the next • Common transition words: meanwhile, therefore, sometimes, also, and, but, meantime, nevertheless, however

  10. Use dialogue • Keeps readers attached to a story’s key players • Helps to introduce sources • Use voice • Subjective expression of writer • Writer’s signature or personal style • More license to reveal opinions, personality • Write the ending • Can trail off, or end with a climax • Often ends where the lead started • End with a quote

  11. Let’s go to NewsU • http://www.newsu.org/ • Get Me Rewrite: The Craft of Revision

  12. Chapter 7: Law • First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.— The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

  13. Media rights • Privileges and protections for journalistic activities. • Access to government operations and records. Rights fall into two main categories:

  14. Media rights • Fair report privilege • Allows journalists to report anything said in official government proceedings. • Must be accurate and fair. Privilege and protection for sources and stories • Opinion privilege • Protects written opinions from libel suits. • Distinction between facts and opinion.

  15. Media rights • Allows journalists to criticize performers, politicians and other matters of public interest. Privilege and protection… • Fair comment and criticism • Freedom from newsroom searches • Shield laws

  16. Reporters and their sources • Shield Laws • Statutory laws to protect reporters from revealing sources • Each state has different interpretation • What does Minnesota have?

  17. Fair trial vs. free press • Conflict between First Amendment and Sixth Amendment • Sixth amendment: Rights of the accused to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury • Why would there be a conflict? • Jury Duty

  18. Where to learn more • Minnesota statutes • U.S. Supreme Court • Federal circuit courts • Online legal research

  19. Open courtrooms The issues • Does media coverage harm trial defendants? • Do cameras turn courtrooms into circuses? • Should press be banned from some trials? The law • U.S. Supreme Court ruled that criminal trials must remain open to the media except for “overriding interest.”

  20. Open meetings The issues • Should public officials be allowed to make decisions behind closed doors? • At what point does government secrecy become a threat? The law • Varies by state. • Generally, if the government board or commission receives revenue from taxes, subject to open meeting laws.

  21. Open records The issues • Should all government records be accessible to the public? • Who decides what is off-limits? The law • 1966 Freedom of Information Act requires federal agencies to make most of their records available. • Every state has own version of FOIA.

  22. Online resources • The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (www.rcfp.org) • “How to Use the Federal FOI Act” • “Tapping Officials’ Secrets” • “Can We Tape?” • Legal Defense Hotline (1-800-336-4235) • Student Press Law Center (www.splc.org) • “Open records Law Request Letter Generator” • SPLC Virtual Lawyer

  23. Media wrongs Reporter’s Guide to Trouble • Stories that can get you jailed • Contempt of court • Trespassing • Sedition • Stories that can get you sued • Libel • Invasion of privacy • Breach of contract

  24. Media wrongs Reporter’s Guide to Trouble • Stories that can get you fired • Plagiarism • Fabrication • Lapses in ethics • Stories that can get you angry phone calls • Bias • Bad taste • Blunders & bloopers

  25. Understanding libel Beginning reporter’s guide to libel • Who can sue for libel? • Living people. • Small groups. • Who is it that gets sued? • Usually, the publication. • What is libel? • False statements and • Defamatory and • Published and • Identifiable plaintiffs and • Defendant must beat fault through negligence or malice.

  26. “Red Flag” Words: Libel & Privacy

  27. Classes of libelous words • Words imputing the commission of a criminal offense Avoid: John Doe was taken into custody Wednesday for murdering Sally Smith Tuesday night. Better: John Doe was taken into custody Wednesday in connection with (or in the investigation of) the Tuesday night slaying of Sally Smith.

  28. Words that impute infection with a loathsome communicable disease of any kind that would tend to exclude one from society. Is this news?: John Doe, who was elected Wednesday to be president of the local chapter of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, was treated last summer for a venereal disease, the Daily Bugle has learned.

  29. Words that impute inability to perform, or want of integrity in the discharge of, duties of office or employment. Don’t write: Public school groundskeeper John Doe is unfit by temperament and intelligence to adequately perform his duties, sources who wish to remain anonymous said Wednesday. • Words that prejudice a particular person in his or her profession or trade. Don’t write: Attorney John Doe, who will represent the widow in the embezzlement case, is the most incompetent lawyer in town, according to courthouse observers.

  30. Defamation by implication • Implication created by the reporter’s organization of facts. John Jones was seen entering the Shady Oaks motel yesterday with a woman. The motel is located in a known prostitution area.

  31. Quotations • Reporter/news medium must assume responsibility for the statement if it is used • The fact that information was provided by a source does not necessarily mean that it is correct. • Beware of off-the-record tips passed along by sources, even high-ranking officials or law enforcement officers. • Don’t write: Police said that the alleged crook is in custody. • Instead: Police said that the man charged with the crime is in custody.

  32. Defenses against libel • Conditional defenses • Privilege of reporting: Fair, accurate reporting of official proceedings • Fair comment and criticism: Applies to opinions about matters of public concern • Neutral reportage: Report charges made by one responsible person or organization about another when both parties are involved in a public controversy

  33. Understanding libel • How do I defend myself? • Truth • Consent • Privilege • How can I avoid libel? • Verify material. • Allow people to defend themselves. • Remember, public officials often make “unofficial” claims. • If you make mistake, correct it.

  34. Understanding libel The Cherry Sisters vs. “Fair Comment and Criticism” • Iowa supreme court – “Any performance to which the public is invited may be freely criticized.” • “Also, any editor may publish reasonable comments on that performance.”

  35. Understanding libel • Actual malice–knowing you are lying or disregarding the truth • Opinion–ideas that don’t claim to be factual • Slander – defamation that is spoken A lexicon of libel • Public official –someone who exercises power or influence in governmental affairs • Public figure – person who has acquired fame or notoriety

  36. Absolute libel defenses • Statute of limitations • Two years in Minnesota • Truth • Privilege of participant • Participants in official proceedings • Consent or authorization • Self-defense or right of reply

  37. Partial defenses • Publication of a retraction: Clear admission of erroneous reporting • Facts showing no gross negligence or ill will • Facts showing that the reporter relied on a usually reliable source

  38. The actual malice standard • The New York Times rule • New York Times Co. v. Sullivan: 1964 • Supreme Court: To collect damages, a public official would have to prove the defendant acted with “actual malice;” knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not. • 1967: Supreme Court said that public figures, in addition to public officials, also have to show actual malice to recover libel damages. Bottom line: More protection from libel action if plaintiff is a public person.

  39. Checklist for dealing with libel • Be aggressive – but don’t take foolish risks • Be fair – keep an open mind • Seek advice if you are unsure of your turf

  40. Out-of-Class Assignments • Due Today: • Textbook Quiz/Second feature story draft • Due December 13: • Review of journalist interviews

  41. In-Class Assignment • News Releases

More Related