1 / 28

Presentation prepared by: Mathew N. KILEO Clerk Public Accounts Committee Tanzania P.O. Box 9133

Public Procurement System in Tanzania Presentation in the SADCOPAC / EAAPAC Accountability Conference 2012 Windhoek Namibia. Welcome Karibuni. Presentation prepared by: Mathew N. KILEO Clerk Public Accounts Committee Tanzania P.O. Box 9133 Tel: +255 22 2112065/7, Fax: +255 22 2112538

benson
Télécharger la présentation

Presentation prepared by: Mathew N. KILEO Clerk Public Accounts Committee Tanzania P.O. Box 9133

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Public Procurement System in Tanzania Presentation in the SADCOPAC / EAAPAC Accountability Conference 2012 Windhoek Namibia Welcome Karibuni Presentation prepared by: Mathew N. KILEO Clerk Public Accounts Committee Tanzania P.O. Box 9133 Tel: +255 22 2112065/7, Fax: +255 22 2112538 Email: tanzparl@parliament.go.tz Websit: www.parliament.go.tz Dar-es-Salaam Tanzania

  2. Reforms in Public Procurement Regime • Procurement reforms in Tanzania started way back in 1997. • The reforms led to enactment of Public Procurement Act No. 3 in March 2001 (PPA 2001). It became operational in July 2001.

  3. Reforms in Public Procurement Regime • In 2002 a Country Procurement Review Assessment was carried out which suggested further reforms from centralized to decentralized procurement System • The Reforms culminated in enactment of Public Procurement Act 2004.

  4. Applicable to all public bodies including those not receiving subvention Procurement Thresholds No Procurement Thresholds Central Tender Board PPRA PPA No. 21 of 2004 PPA N0.3 of 2001 Head of PEs chairperson of TB Head of PEs not chairperson of TB but they appoint members Not applicable to Parastatals not receiving Gov. subvention PPAA has chairperson and Four Members PPAA has chairperson and six members Major differences between PPA 2001 and PPA 2004

  5. Regulatory Framework of Procurement in Tanzania The Public Procurement (Goods, Works, Non-Consultant Services and Disposal of Public Assets by Tender) Regulations GN. No 97 of 2005 Public Procurement Act No. 21 of 2004 Local Government Tender Board (Establishment and Proceedings) Regulations Standard Tender Documents Other Circulars periodically issued by PPRA Guidelines for Preparation of Responsive bids Tender Evaluation Guidelines The Public Procurement (Employment and Selection of Consultants) Regulations GN. No 98 of 2005

  6. PPAA SET UP OF PROCURING ENTITIES ACCOUNTING OFFICER PPRA TB submits to AO approved bidder for notification of award Provisions to Handle disagreements Members recommended by PMU and approved by AO Reports to AO TENDER BOARD PMU Submit Recommendations to TB for Approval Evaluation committees PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT UNIT Evaluation report submitted to PMU User Departments initiate Requirements, inputs to specifications and in evaluation

  7. Strong oversight body (PPRA) Proper implementation Guidelines INTERVENTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH PPA 2004 Capacity of PEs and bidders to implement the Act Proper system for checking and Monitoring Proper System of Sharing Information

  8. THE JOURNEY TOWARDS 2015 2015? 2015 – 100% COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW AND ENSURING VALUE FOR MONEY

  9. THE JOURNEY- IS IT ACHIEVABLE ???? Yes it is achievable as long as every PE aims to achieve Vfm

  10. The need to improve efficiency – High Expenditure in Public Procurement 315 PEs Tshs 4.52 trillion 216 PEs Tshs 2.96 trillion 264 PEs Tshs 3.10 trillion VOLUME OF PROCUREMENT CARRIED OUT BY PROCURING ENTITIES SINCE FINANCIAL YEAR 2007/08

  11. The need to improve efficiency – Low levels of Compliance 91 PEs 174 PEs 99 PEs 100 PEs 20 PEs TREND OF PROCURING ENTITIES COMPLIANCE WITH PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ACT AND ITS REGULATIONS SINCE FINANCIAL YEAR 2006/07

  12. Efforts to increase efficiency • Many efforts are being undertaken – only few shall be highlighted in this presentation

  13. AREAS OF FOCUS

  14. BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER INTERNAL AUDIT UNIT DIVISION OF LEGAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT UNIT Legal and Secretariat Affairs Section Public Relations Section DIVISION OF CORPORATE SERVICES DIVISION OF CAPACITY BUILDING AND ADVISORY SERVICES DIVISION OF MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE DIVISION OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Guidelines Development and Dissemination Section Systems Support and Administration Section Monitoring and Evaluation Section Planning and Coordination Section Research and Documentation Section Contract Performance Section Systems Development and Maintenance Section Finance and Accounting Section Training and Advisory Services Section NORTHEN ZONE Administration and Human Resources Section Investigation and Anti-Corruption Section LAKE ZONE COAST ZONE Zonal Services Section CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN ZONE New Structure- From 51 Staff (2001) to 142 Staff (2004) Expanding PPRA Outreach

  15. PPRA TO REACH LGAs – opening of zonal offices Mwanza Arusha D’Salaam Iringa

  16. SYSTEM OF PROCUREMENT OF COMMON USE ITEMS AND SERVICES – REDUCED PROCUREMENT TRANSACTION COSTS -Aggregates all CUIS from PEs GPSA -Decides on the appropriates Procurement Method -Submits a list of CUIS to GPSA -Prepares and Maintains CUIS and Suppliers Data Base -Compiles a list of CUIS -Submits a list of Framework Agreements -Maintains Data on placed Call Off orders as received from PEs -List of CUIS approved PROCURING ENTITY PPRA Enters into Framework Agreement with winners Invites Tenders -Submits copies of Call Off Orders to PPRA and GPSA -Places and pays for Call Off Order -Supplies and paid for the call off order SUPPLIER/SERVICE PROVIDER 16

  17. Efficiency in sharing procurement information to the public

  18. Efficiency in sharing procurement information to the public

  19. Efficiency in procurement transactions – e-procurement – Tanzania has done a feasibility study and is currently working on issues relating to system selection, hosting, infrastructure, application, operation and maintenance, as well security

  20. Amendments to the Act –Notable Amendments to Complaints Review Mechanism

  21. PPAA-if not satisfied with the decision of PPRA or after the expiry of a 30 days period PPRA-if not satisfied with the decision or after the expiry of a 30 days period Suspend procurement proceedings After signing of contract TOTAL 105 DAYS Copy of decision submitted to PPRA and the RC Before the signing of contract Conduct investigations HEAD OF PE Decision within 30 days Bidders complaint Presented within 28 days from the day of the event leading to complaint Copy of complaints submitted to PPRA and the RC System for Procurement Complaints Review

  22. Amendments to the Act –Notable Amendments: Integration of procurement plan with budgeting process

  23. Challenges Failure by Some PEs to utilize the opportunity for reducing procurement transaction cost e.g use framework contracts for procurement of CUIS and advertize in the TPJ and Authority website Corrupt and fraudulent practices in procurement process despite the effort being spent to prevent and combat them

  24. Challenges Commercial operators such as suppliers and service providers, as well as CSOs have not effectively used the opportunities availed by the PPRA to build their capacity PEs to be encouraged to do procurement capability review assessment and allocate resources for capacity building of their staff

  25. Way Forward • Action to be taken against PEs not demonstrating commitment to reduction of procurement transaction cost • Commercial operators should be sensitized to register as appropriate and take part in improving their capacity to withstand the competitive procurement market in the country as well as in the region

  26. Way Forward • The CSOs should be empowered to actively participate in advocacy of good governance in public procurement and monitoring of process and outcome in delivery of services • The fight against fraud and corruption in public procurement should be intensified by more collaborative initiatives among key stakeholders

  27. WE can all overcome

  28. Thank you for listening The End

More Related