1 / 22

Lattice study of charmonia in Hot QCD

Explore the lattice study of charmonium behavior in Hot QCD conducted by T. Umeda and collaborators. Dive into J/ψ suppression, dissociation temperatures, and wave functions at elevated temperatures. Delve into correlation effects, finite volume considerations, and boundary conditions influencing charmonium states.

bernals
Télécharger la présentation

Lattice study of charmonia in Hot QCD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lattice study of charmonia in Hot QCD T. Umeda (YITP, Kyoto univ.) H. Ohno, K. Kanaya (Univ. of Tsukuba) (WHOT-QCD Collaboration) Mini-Workshop on ''Photons and Leptons in Hot/Dense QCD" Nagoya University, Aichi, Japan , March 3rd 2009 T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  2. Contents of this talk from the Phenix group web-site • Introduction • -- Quark Gluon Plasma & J/ψ suppression • -- Lattice studies on J/ψ suppression • Our approach to study charmonium dissociation • Charmonium spectra & wave functions at T>0 • Summary & future plan T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  3. Confined phase: linear raising potential  bound state of c - c De-confined phase: Debye screening  scattering state of c - c T.Hashimoto et al.(’86), Matsui&Satz(’86) J/ψ suppression as a signal of QGP Lattice QCD calculations: Spectral function by MEM: T.Umeda et al.(’02), S.Datta et al.(’04), Asakawa&Hatsuda(’04), A.Jakovac et al.(’07), G.Aatz et al.(’06) Wave func.: T.Umeda et al.(’00) B. C. dep.: H.Iida et al. (’06)  all calculations conclude thatJ/ψ survives till 1.5Tc or higher T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  4. Sequential J/ψ suppression scenario ψ’ 10% 60% J/ψ χc AA collisions 30% E705 Collab.(’93) J/ψ (1S) : JPC = 1– – M=3097MeV (Vector) ψ (2S) : JPC = 1– – M=3686MeV (Vector) χc0 (1P) : JPC = 0++ M=3415MeV (Scalar) χc1 (1P) : JPC = 1++ M=3511MeV (AxialVector) PDG(’06) It is important to study dissociation temperatures for not only J/ψ but also ψ(2S), χc’s T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  5. Charmonium correlators at T>0 • small change in S-wave states  survival of J/ψ & ηc at T>Tc • drastic change in P-wave states  dissociation of χcjust above Tc (?) S. Datta et al., Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 094507. etc... T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  6. χc dissociation just above Tc ? “χc dissociation just above Tc” is consistent with the sequential suppression scenario. In the paper, they concluded that • the drastic change of P-states corr. just above Tc is reliable. • Spectral functions for P-states are not so reliable. e.g. large default model dep. A.Jakovac et al., Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 014506. T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  7. Constant mode in meson correlators T.Umeda, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 094502. exp(-mqt) x exp(-mqt) = exp(-2mqt) mq is quark mass or single quark energy exp(-mqt) x exp(-mq(Lt-t)) = exp(-mqLt) Lt = temporal extent We can separate the constant mode from correlators usual effective mass subtracted effective mass T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  8. Constant mode effects in charmonia subtracted effective mass usual effective masses at T>0 0.1at=800MeV the drastic change in P-wave states disappears in meffsub(t)  the change is due to the constant mode T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  9. infinite volume case finite volume case Spectral functions in a finite volume Momenta are discretized in finite (V=L3) volume pi/a = 2niπ/L (ni=0,±1,±2,…) for Periodic boundary condition In a finite volume (e.g. Lattice simulations), discrete spectra does not always indicate bound states ! T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  10. MEM test using T=0 data # data for T/Tc=1.2 # data for T/Tc=0.6 # data for T/Tc=0 χc dissociation just above Tc ? This result is strange ?? A.Jakovac et al., Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 014506. MEM analysis can fail if data quality is not sufficient. “P-wave states have larger noise than that of S-wave states” T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  11. finite volume case In order to study a few lowest states, the variational analysis is one of the most reliable approaches ! N x N correlation matrix : C(t) Another approach to study charmonium at T>0 It is difficult to extract higher states from lattice correlators (at T>0) even if we use MEM !! We want to get information about a few lowest states (at T>0) Constant mode can be separated by the Midpoint subtraction T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  12. Volume dependence E : energy V : volume Φ(r): wave function r : c - c distance bound scattering E E V V • Boundary Condition (B.C.) dep. bound scattering φ φ (r) (r) M M BC BC’ BC BC’ Bound state or scattering state ? In a finite volume, discrete spectra does not always indicate bound states. • Wave function bound scattering r r H.Iida et al.(’06), N.Ishii et al.(’05) T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  13. Lattice setup • Quenched approximation ( no dynamical quark effect ) • Anisotropic lattices lattice spacing :as = 0.0970(5) fm anisotropy : as/at = 4 • rs=1 to suppress doubler effects • Variational analysis with 4 x 4 correlation matrix t x,y,z T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  14. bound bound M r BC BC’ 0 scattering M φ φ (r) (r) BC BC’ Boundary condition dependence The wave functions are localized, their energies are insensitive to B.C. The momenta depends on BC, the scattering state energies are sensitive to B.C. scattering r 0 The idea has been originally applied for the charmonium study in H. Iida et al., Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 074502. T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  15. P wave S wave PBCAPBCMBC PBCAPBCMBC Variational analysis in free quark case Test with free quarks ( Ls/a=20, ma=0.17 ) PBC : b=( 1, 1, 1) APBC : b=(-1,-1,-1) MBC : b=(-1, 1, 1) an expected diff. in V=(2fm)3 (free quark case) ~ 200MeV Mass diff. between the lowest masses in each BC T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  16. PBC APBC PBC APBC PBC MBC PBC MBC Temperature dependence of charmonium spectra ηc(2S) Ψ(2S) ηc(1S) J/Ψ(1S) PBC : b=( 1, 1, 1) APBC : b=(-1,-1,-1) MBC : b=(-1, 1, 1) χc0(2P) χc1(2P) an expected gap in V=(2fm)3 (free quark case) ~ 200MeV χc0(1P) χc1(1P) • No significant differences in the different B.C. • Analysis is difficult at higher temperature ( 2Tc～) T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  17. Wave functions at finite temperature Temp. dependence of ( Bethe-Salpeter ) “Wave function” using the eigen functions of the variational method  we can extract the wave functions of each states T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  18. Wave functions in free quark case Test with free quarks ( Ls/a=20, ma=0.17 ) in case of S-wave channels • Free quarks make trivial waves with an allowed momentum in a box • The wave function is constructed with eigen functions of 4 x 4 correlators • Our method well reproduces • the analytic solutions ( ! ) T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  19. Charmonium wave functions at finite temperatures • Small temperature dependence in each channels • Clear signals of bound states even at T=2.3Tc ( ! ) • Large volume is necessary for P-wave states. T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  20. T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  21. Volume dependence at T=2.3Tc χc1(1P) J/ψ(1S) χc1(2P) ψ(2S) • Clear signals of bound states even at T=2.3Tc ( ! ) • Large volume is necessary for P-wave states. T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

  22. No evidence for unbound c-c quarks up to T = 2.3 Tc Summary and future plan We investigated Tdis of charmonia from Lattice QCD • using another approach to study charmonium at T>0 without Bayesian analysis - boundary condition dependence - Wave function (Volume dependence)  The result may affect the scenario of J/ψ suppression. • Future plan • Interpretations of the experimental results on J/ψ suppression • Higher Temp. calculations ( T/Tc=3~5 ) • Full QCD calculations ( Nf=2+1 Wilson is now in progress ) T.Umeda (Kyoto Univ.)

More Related