1 / 15

EVALUATION: FINAL REPORT

GRUNDTVIG PARTNERSHIPS. EVALUATION: FINAL REPORT. NO PROFIT EUROPE. Final meeting Palermo, July 4 – 5 th 2012. INTRODUCTION - PREMISES.

bernie
Télécharger la présentation

EVALUATION: FINAL REPORT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GRUNDTVIG PARTNERSHIPS EVALUATION: FINAL REPORT NO PROFIT EUROPE Final meeting Palermo, July 4 – 5th 2012

  2. INTRODUCTION - PREMISES Evaluation and monitoring is a transversal activity applied within working teams and partnerships with the aim of creating the conditions to continuously check the project work in progress and the achievement of expected interim and final outcomes, so as: • to highlight the possible divergences between what has been planned and actually realised; • to identify the risk areas; • to adopt the proper measure to ensure the achievement of goals defined

  3. INTRODUCTION - PREMISES Evaluation and Monitoring of “NO PROFIT EUROPE” project activities, have been implemented through a desk analysis action, using semi-structured grids sent to all partners, by e-mail, to be filled in and returned to coordinator PEGASO Soc. Coop. Sociale (in charge of evaluation and monitoring). In this case the grids will ask for information concerning the work in progress of: • Activities (meetings); • Approach of partners • Satisfaction level of each partner; • Correspondence between expectancies and activities actually made .

  4. PARTNERS INVOLVED • PEGASO Soc.Coop. Sociale, Palermo (IT) (Coordinator) • OAKE Associates Ltd, Manchester, Manchester (UK) • IFAID Institut de Formation et d’Appui aux Initiatives de Développement, Bordeaux (FR) • ELLINIKH ETAIRIA DIOIKISEOS EPICHIRISEON (EEDE) (Hellenic Management Association - ΗΜΑ), Athens (EL) • CARITAS Archidiecezji Gdańskiej, Gdansk (PL)

  5. EVALUATION OF EACH MEETING Kick-off meeting: Palermo (IT) 28st – 29th October 2010 2nd meeting in Athens (EL): 10th – 11th February 2011 3rd meeting in Bordeaux (FR): 30th June – 1st July 2011 4th meeting in Lichfield (UK): 24th – 25th November 2011 5th meeting in Sopot (PL): 24th – 25th May 2012 Final meeting in Palermo (IT): 4th – 5th July 2012 (not evaluated here, as Global Final Evaluation is introduced during Final meeting)

  6. MEETING IN PALERMO: 28th – 29th OCTOBER 2010

  7. MEETING IN ATHENS: 10th – 11th February 2011

  8. MEETING IN BORDEAUX: 30th JUNE– 1st JULY 2011

  9. MEETING IN LICHFIELD: 24th – 25th NOVEMBER 2011

  10. MEETING IN SOPOT: MAY 2012

  11. GLOBAL EVALUATION OF MEETINGS Kick-off meeting: Palermo (IT) 28st – 29th October 2010 2nd meeting in Athens (EL): 10th – 11th February 2011 3rd meeting in Bordeaux (FR): 30th June – 1st July 2011 4th meeting in Lichfield (UK): 24th – 25th November 2011 5th meeting in Sopot (PL): 24th – 25th May 2012 Final meeting in Palermo (IT): 4th – 5th July 2012 (not evaluated here, as Global Final Evaluation is introduced during Final meeting)

  12. GLOBAL EVALUATION OF MEETINGS

  13. COMMENTS - MEETINGS THE MOST QUOTED GENERAL ASPECTS HAVE BEEN: • Coherency of topics with the principles of Leonardo da Vinci’s Subprogramme and LLP; • Feedback among partners; • Transparence and clarity of proposals; • Cooperation and work team; • Clear and comprehensive communication; • Sharing information; • Cultural exchange. THE LEAST QUOTED GENERAL ASPECTS HAVE BEEN: • Agenda flexibility; • Suitability of time spent for each topic.

  14. COMMENTS - MEETINGS ATTITUDE OF PARTNERS : • Involvement of partners in the activities of the project; • High motivation about activities/tasks developed according to Work Plan; • In general, attitude of partners has been active towards the project and overall items scheduled in each meetings agenda. OVERALL SATISFACTION DEGREE: • In general, partners are very satisfied (83,03%) and satisfied (16,97%) with the implementation of activities. HAVE THE EXPECTATIONS BEEN SATISFIED? • Expectations satisfied for about 88,85% of partner organisations (in despite of some unforeseen absence in some meeting); • Expectations are partly satisfied only for 11,15%.

  15. Thank you for your attention

More Related