1 / 12

Performance Based Contracting

Performance Based Contracting. Presented for RESNA’s Catalyst Project by Sönke Dornblut ATinNH Program Coordinator 603-862-4064 | sonke.dornblut@unh.edu. History. Single Contractor for all Loan, Demonstration and Refurbishing activities. Aimed at sustainable capacity building.

berny
Télécharger la présentation

Performance Based Contracting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Performance Based Contracting Presented for RESNA’s Catalyst Project by Sönke Dornblut ATinNH Program Coordinator 603-862-4064 | sonke.dornblut@unh.edu

  2. History • Single Contractor for all Loan, Demonstration and Refurbishing activities. • Aimed at sustainable capacity building. • Limited options. • Lack of leverage.

  3. Performance Based Contracting • Initiated in response to change from “sunsetting project” to “ongoing program”. • Objectives: • Diversify contractor base. • Accountability for deliverables. • Uniform payment basis.

  4. What we did • Online data collection/reporting system. Features: • Online inventory • Demo / Loan / Reuse data reporting forms. • Review of data entered – immediate feedback. • Forces complete data sets.

  5. What we did • Budgeting: • Annual projections. • Simple service provider agreements • Identified common, per loan/demo/reuse value.

  6. The Annual Process • August/September • Partners submit annual projections by demo/loan/reuse and equipment category. • ATinNH develops overall budget. • Contract proposals to partners. • October/November • New FY agreements implemented. • Annual data pull and analysis – report to MIS.

  7. The Annual Process • Quarterly Partner Meetings. • Data review. • Sharing of implementation ideas and issues. • Quarterly Invoices. • New: Online invoicing out data reporting site. • Verification against data submitted. • Third quarter data to date review. • Decisions to move allocations between partners based on actual performance.

  8. Lessons Learned • Online System must be robust • Speed is critical for data submission. • Partner input is vital in the development and feature build out. • System allows for partners to review their data submitted and offers standard reports for their use (with boards etc.) • Immediate feedback is essential. • Simplify (Integration of invoicing and data projection features).

  9. Lessons Learned • Creates comparability. • Allow to grow slowly. • Ability to fill in gaps (equipment category, geographic coverage). • Benefits form in-house IT capacity. • Easy system for new partners. • Facilitated our expansion from one partner to nine. • Stay flexible, allow for modifications on a case by case basis.

  10. Questions? Sönke Dornblut Assistive Technology in New Hampshire sonke.dornblut@unh.edu | 603-862-4064

More Related