1 / 41

Physician-Patient Encounters The Physician Perspective

Physician-Patient Encounters The Physician Perspective. Michael Stearns, MD, CPC HIT Consultant. High Level Physician Goals. Develop a rapport with the patient Establish credibility with the patient Establish the reliability of the patient Gather information From the history

bess
Télécharger la présentation

Physician-Patient Encounters The Physician Perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Physician-Patient EncountersThe Physician Perspective Michael Stearns, MD, CPC HIT Consultant

  2. High Level Physician Goals • Develop a rapport with the patient • Establish credibility with the patient • Establish the reliability of the patient • Gather information • From the history • From the examination • From test results • From reports from other providers • Get through the examination efficiently • Get paid, if surgical get cases… • Don’t get sued • Don’t become subjected to a negative audit • Have the patient say good things about you in the community, in particular to the physician who referred the patient to you

  3. Develop a rapport with the patient • Be polite and professional • Not too reserved • Not too friendly • Appear knowledgeable • Patient may know more about a disease than you do, e.g., if they have been performing on-line research • Keep the patient on task, but interrupt them as little as possible • Can be very challenging…

  4. Establish Credibility with the Patient • Be a good listener • EHRs can interfere with this process • Demonstrate familiarity with their complaints and ask insightful questions • Communicate in a way they can easily understand, without coming across as patronizing…

  5. Establish the Reliability of the Patient • In some cases you need to interpret information that is provided by the patient • Secondary gain (may be a factor, such as what may be seen for potential disability when there is insurance) • Psychological issues • Embellishment tied to: • Fears that underlying condition is serious in nature • Fears that they will not be taken seriously unless they “amplify” the severity of their symptoms

  6. Prioritize Nature of Visit • Use the history, physical and the results of diagnostic studies • Form an impression of what might be influencing the patient’s health • Identify potential emergency conditions • Sometimes seconds matter • Focus on conditions that can be treated first • Be very wary of making assumptions that could lead to misdiagnosis

  7. Chief Complaint • Typically a brief statement that starts the note • Includes: • Background demographics • Some background medical information • Reason they are being seen, often in the patient’s own words • For example: • The patient is a 44-year-old white male with a history of hypertension and diabetes who presents with “numbness in my toes.” • There are multiple variations as to how a CC is structured • Classic description is “The reason why the patient is being seen in their own words” • Documentation guidelines (for reimbursement) state that a CC must be present, but it can be part of the HPI.

  8. History of Present Illness • Basically the story behind the visit • 80% of anydiagnosis is made from the HPI • Iterative and interactive process • Series of questions and answers • Follows logical course • Requires expert knowledge of how diseases present • Physician may develop a short list of diagnoses (in their mind) that he/she is considering • Responses to questions drive next question • Somewhat algorithmic • Eliminate some conditions • Confirm others • Gives weighting to certain conditions over others in many cases

  9. History of Present Illness (2) • May include relevant past medical information • Relevant medications • Responses to prior treatments • Underlying diseases • Prior injuries or events (e.g., trauma) • Family history • Social history

  10. History of Present Illness (3) • Summary of relevant recent events • Recent hospitalizations • Recent surgeries • Prior evaluations by other providers • Stressors that could influence health • E.g., Work-related stress

  11. History of Present Illness (4) • HPI documentation goals • Document information for purely clinical use • Reference notes for point of care use • Future visits • Information to be used for care at other locations • Medicolegal documentation • Demonstrate that the standard of care was met via documentation • Be wary of template defaults and cloning of information • Reimbursement purposes • HPI heavily influences coding and reimbursement • Need 1-4 HPI elements OR 3 chronic diseases and their statuses • Used to determine E&M level of service

  12. The HPI and EHRs • Enter complex information and overcome natural language challenges • Free text entry via voice recognition, typing or other methods • However, this usually results in the loss of structured data (also called discrete data and/or codified data) • May be offset by NLP and automated coding • Templates/Macros popular in EHRs • Need to capture as many potential questions as possible through drop down lists with branches • Huge amount of potential information could be needed • HPI templates generally are difficult to build • Well constructed templates have the ability to remind physicians of certain questions that should be asked

  13. HPIs and EHRs (2) • HPI templates continued: • Must take into consideration: • Clinical knowledge to aid with documentation • Medicolegal considerations • Were all the relevant questions asked and documented in case the care of the patient was to later be challenged • Coding and billing questions • Needs to code for the HPI elements (duration, location, severity, quality, modifying factors, context, associated signs and symptoms and timing) • Alternative is to have capacity to recognize when three chronic conditions and their statuses are documented

  14. HPIs and EHRs (3) • Template models vary widely between EHR systems • Usually context specific • E.g., New patient headache, follow-up diabetes, etc. • Usually specialty specific • Very different level of detail may be needed depending on specialty

  15. Past Medical, Family and Social History • Often the next section of the history and physical (H&P) after HPI • May be entered by the patient, taken by the MA, or in some cases imported electronically • Typically reviewed by the provider before they see the patient • Provider will use information from the section to help with determining the diagnosis

  16. Past Medical History • Often obtained prior to the patient being seen by the provider and reviewed by the provider before seeing the patient • Complete history, regardless of relevancy • Can be labor intensive for patient/staff to record • Past medical history usually contains: • Medications • Allergies • Current and former illnesses and injuries • Surgeries • Hospitalizations • Immunization history • Birth history • Others

  17. Problem List • Was a separate sheet in the front of paper chart, used in inpatient records and in some specialties • Has evolved with advent of EHRs to be central component of patient record • Generally a subset of information from the past medical history, limited to relevant conditions that are currently active • Use varies markedly • Central focus of interoperability efforts via CCD

  18. Past Family History • Can be limited to a screening history of relevant medical conditions in the patient’s family history • Weighted towards conditions that have known tendency to be passed from one generation to another • E.g., Huntington’s Disease • Can have less relevance in elderly patients • Will take on a great deal of new significance in the genomic medicine era

  19. Social History • Usually includes: • Occupation • Marital history • Living situation • Family members when relevant • Relationships when relevant • Alcohol use • Drug use • Sexual history • Other social factors

  20. Provider Considerations for PFSH • Make sure all relevant information is obtained • Make sure items that could adversely impact patient care are captured • Medicolegal considerations (e.g., missed drug allergy) • Important for decision support applications, like e-prescribing CDS tools • Needs to be placed into correct sections of EHR to be used for E&M coding • All three needed for highest coding levels • Avoid defaults that bring in too much information and falsely elevate coding levels

  21. HIT Considerations for the PFSH • As compared to the HPI, this section is much more easily “codified” • More applicable to interoperability • Medications, problems (usually selected items from the past medical history), allergies and labs are now shared via CCD • EHRs and other HIT systems have limited capabilities to import and export this data, but this is rapidly evolving

  22. HIT Considerations for the PSFH • Importing data directly from an HIE or other source needs to be done carefully • Data can be corrupted • E.g., wrong code used and then interpreted incorrectly by receiving system • Incomplete or inaccurate data can impact patient care • Negation can corrupt data • Uncertainty can corrupt data • Data integrity is a rapidly emerging area of HIT

  23. HIT Considerations for PSFH (3) • EHR • May provide templates • May require specialty specific templates • E.g., details of prior surgeries for surgical subspecialty like orthopedics • Data may be codified at point of capture • ICD-9-CM in most cases • CPT in some instances • SNOMED CT emerging • May need to interact with an immunization module, and state registries

  24. Review of Systems • Inventory of current body systems • Basically a screen following the HPI and PFSH to identify any other symptoms or patient identified findings that were not previously addressed in HPI • Typically about 14 systems are used • E.g., respiratory system, cardiovascular system, etc.

  25. Review of Systems (2) • Labor intensive • Can lead to discovery of new information that could markedly impact diagnosis and care decisions • Can also be a time intensive pursuit of information that is not relevant for that specific encounter • Questions like “are you experiencing fatigue” are potentially going to yield a high percentage of positive responses that the provider may feel obligated to pursue….

  26. Review of Systems (3) • What is the provider thinking? • Don’t miss anything relevant that could impact the care of the patient • Patient care concerns • Medicolegal concerns • EHRs allow for default normals or cloning in ROS; common to see conflicts with HPI • Get the information needed to justify the level of service (e.g., E&M code) • Obtain and document the information as efficiently as possible, i.e., avoid having this take away from time spend in other areas of the encounter

  27. Review of Systems (4) • EHR considerations • ROScan be a major workflow consideration • Patients can enter the data • Via kiosk, patient portal, personal health record, forms that can be scanned, etc. • May need to translate medical information to something patients can consume • MA or other ancillary staff can enter data provided by patients in writing, or taken directly from the patient • Provider may take the ROS, but in general they review information entered by others • Tendency for fraud relatively high in this section due to lack of interaction with HPI • Common for finding in HPI to be in conflict with ROS • Suggests fraud given that ROS defaults are common settings in EHRs

  28. Physical Examination • Typically includes • Measured vital signs: height, weight, blood pressure, pulse, respirations • BMI is calculated • Direct observations of the patient (e.g., skin lesion on face) • Findings on inspection of the patient (e.g., tenderness of the abdomen) • Some test results may be included in the PE (e.g., smear of fluids obtained during procedure)

  29. Physical Examination (2) • Can be very specialty specific • Usually area of body targeted is based on the patient’s presenting complaints • “Full” physical could take 2 hours or more to complete • Very data intensive for abnormal findings • Many clinical examination findings have multiple ways of being described • Eponyms used frequently

  30. Physical Examination (3) • What is the provider thinking? • Don’t miss something that could make a difference in the patient’s care • Perform an adequate examination of the relevant organ system, and document it, to demonstrate the standard of care was met • Document findings in organs system that were medically relevant to examine and captured for level of service (E&M) determination (i.e., how much you should be paid)

  31. EHR Considerations for PE • Massive amounts of content needed • Large templates • Coding rules very complicated in E&M guidelines • 1995 Guidelines nebulous • 1997 Guidelines very specific and specialty appropriate – Used by most EHRs • Ideal for computational assistance • Frequently cited reason why providers purchase an EHR, i.e., to code visits more accurately • Defaults for normal examinations are faster than dictating, however normal defaults have to be used cautiously.. • E.g., normal lower extremities documented in a patient who has a leg amputation • The government is watching…. • Pulling forward a prior examination can be very efficient, but needs to be done with caution • Providers need to review each character on the screen and take ownership

  32. Labs, Test Results and Procedures • Often placed in the clinical record between physical and assessment • May be in other locations such as the HPI, assessment or plan • Includes: • Lab values obtained prior to or during the visit • Radiology findings obtained prior to or during the visit • Other test results (e.g., exercise treadmill test) • Reports from other providers • Procedures performed as part of the encounter • E.g., draining fluid from a knee

  33. Provider Considerations (Labs, etc.) • What is the provider thinking? • Quickly assemble all relevant information to help with making the diagnosis and treatment plan • Don’t miss something relevant that would be considered part of the standard of care • Capture the fact that the information was reviewed for reimbursement (E&M) purposes • Enter the information efficiently

  34. EHR Considerations • EHR may or may not have ability to import lab and other information of this nature into H&P note • For example, a PACS system may allow import of radiology results) • Often will not have ability to capture this as information relevant to E&M coding • Point system is used when providers look at test results, look at actual images, etc. • Need to be documented but can influence level of complexity of visit • May not have ability to template the procedure, which are the most straightforward types of encounters to document in EHRs

  35. Assessment • Provider pulls together all relevant information and often creates a “differential diagnosis” • Differential diagnosis is a weighted list of potential diagnoses • Ranked based on • Potential urgency • Can the problem be treated • What is the most likely underlying disease • What else needs to be considered? • “Zebras”

  36. Provider Considerations • What is the provider thinking? • Demonstrate that all relevant diagnoses, based on clinical relevance, have been considered • Demonstrate thought process behind conclusions • Demonstrate level of knowledge to other providers (in particular for specialists) • Demonstrate that the patient has been made fully informed regarding their condition

  37. EHR Considerations • Create tools that assist with diagnosis • Clinical Decision Support (CDS) • List of alternative diagnoses to consider • Access to knowledge resources • Import diagnoses from other sections of the record • Modify diagnoses • Need to choose ICD-9/10 codes that are needed for billing of the encounter • Justify complexity of visit through description of patient’s problem and potential risks to their future health, and the risk of interventions

  38. Plan • Includes • Diagnostic tests • Treatments • Medications • Surgeries • Therapy • Others • Patient instructions • Follow-up care • Return visits • Referrals to other providers

  39. Plan (2) • What is the provider thinking? • Prescribe medications where risk is offset by potential benefit • Fully inform patient of potential risks • Order tests that confirm diagnosis or eliminate diagnoses under consideration • Refer patients as appropriate to other care provider such as specialists • Follow a plan of care that would be consistent with the standard of care • Patient education and counseling of particular importance • Capture information that will be used for level of service (E&M)

  40. EHR Considerations • Interact with data entered in other sections of record to assist provider with management • CDS (e.g., medication contraindications) • Standards of care for specific conditions • E.g., correct antibiotic to use • Capture what was discussed with the patient • Macros, templates, free text or VR often used • Present provider with coding summary, including level of service (E&M) coding assistance tools • Allow provider to close note and send relevant information to a billing tool.

  41. Thank You • Any questions? • Contact information • Email address: mcjstearns@gmail.com

More Related