1 / 18

József Hegedüs: Social housing in the transition countries -- case of Hungary

József Hegedüs: Social housing in the transition countries -- case of Hungary. The future of social housing in Europe European colloquium 22-23 of November 2007 ENPC – Rue des St Péres - Paris. Outline of the presentation. Overview of the transition countries

bethan
Télécharger la présentation

József Hegedüs: Social housing in the transition countries -- case of Hungary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. József Hegedüs:Social housing in the transition countries -- case of Hungary The future of social housing in Europe European colloquium 22-23 of November 2007 ENPC – Rue des St Péres - Paris Metropolitan Research Institute

  2. Outline of the presentation • Overview of the transition countries • Privatization, restitution – different approaches • Need for social housing: programs (white papers) • Options: • Hosing allowances • Social rental sector: municipal housing, non-profit solutions, private renting • „low cost” housing • Case of Hungary • Development of the housing policy • Social rental sector: • Privatization • Rental programs (2000-2004) • Rent-allowance program (2005- ) • Programs for owner occupation • Urban housing program • Housing estates • Inner city rehabilitation – social rehabilitation • Conclusion Metropolitan Research Institute

  3. What kinds of housing models are these countries heading to? • End of the East European Housing Model* • Collapse of state provision: new role • Structural changes: market and „non-market” spheres • Housing regimes (~welfare regimes) • Security (welfare programs) • Public sector involvement in development and management • Subsidy programs (targeted or general) • Divergence or universal models? • Different institutional solutions may lead to the same regimes • Same institutions may lead to different regimes *Hegedüs-Tosics, 1996 Metropolitan Research Institute

  4. Main trends: privatization 1990 2001 Metropolitan Research Institute

  5. Social housing policy after the transition: common structural problems • Poor housing conditions (housing need and substandard housing) • Affordability issues: paying the cost of housing and access to housing • Income distribution and the informal economy • Management of the housing stock (problem of urban housing: „new” housing estate, condominium) Metropolitan Research Institute

  6. Housing policy alternatives • Housing allowances and social welfare support • Promoting the social rental sector • Public rental • Cooperative (TBS) • Private rental • Supporting (low-income) home owners • Contract savings • Interest subsidies • Tax advantages • Cash subsidies etc. Metropolitan Research Institute

  7. Country experiences: no clear strategy • Different solutions were chosen, influenced by: • the existing legal and institutional background (legacy of the old system) • International experiences: private institutions (like contract saving, cooperatives, etc.), donor agencies • the dynamics of local politics and macroeconomic conditions • Different outcomes: • Innovative solutions without policy support • Policy support for unsustainable model • Windfall effects: lack of capacity to make public choices Metropolitan Research Institute

  8. Periods of housing policy after transition in Hungary • 1989-1995: withdrawal of the state from the housing sector -- „shock absorber” • 1996-2000: establishment of the housing finance institution system – „crises” • 2000-2006: development of the new housing policy, creation of the new subsidy system, and corrections of the housing policy – „housing policy supporting the middle class” • After 2006 second transition (health care system, education, pension system, etc.) – possibilities for „new social housing” ? Metropolitan Research Institute

  9. Housing policy after 2000 • Elements of the program • Subsidy program for housing mortgage • Rental housing program • Support for housing renovation • Social effects: wide possibilities • Politics: traps of election promises Metropolitan Research Institute

  10. Trends: outstanding housing loans 1990-2006 Metropolitan Research Institute

  11. Housing subsidies (in billionHUF) Metropolitan Research Institute

  12. Evaluation of the interest rate subsidy program • Housing issue in the politics of 2002 • Regressive effects: political traps • Change in development and construction industry • Fiscal effects short-term and long-term Metropolitan Research Institute

  13. Rental programs • Grants for local governments 2001-2003 • Social and „cost” rental • Elderly homes • Transitionary homes • Rent allowance 2005 for the private rental • HDB (Hungarian Development Bank) loan programs for rental investment • Evaluation: limited effect on social inequalities Metropolitan Research Institute

  14. EUR/month/m2 10,0 8,7 8,0 6,0 4,4 4,0 2,1 2,0 0,9 0,4 0,0 private rental: private rental private rental: cost rent social rent upper middle lower Average rent in 2004 (source: CSO and MRI estimates) Metropolitan Research Institute

  15. Programs for housing renovation • Soft loans in the 90s – no demand • Panel renewal: rule of 1/3-1/3-1/3 • Panel Plus from 2005 • Rehabilitation of inner cities • Other specific programs • Social effects: better targeting Metropolitan Research Institute

  16. Results of the „panel” program, 2001-2006 Metropolitan Research Institute

  17. Housing subsidies 1998-2007 Metropolitan Research Institute

  18. Constraints on expanding the social rental sector • Local governments sector • No monitoring, they are under the pressure of middle class (same as the privatization pressure) • Financial dis-incentives (loss and no earmarked grants) – in the framework of the intergovernmental fiscal relation • Private sector involvement • The unpredictability of the market (rent arrears, tenure rights, etc) makes the big investors cautious • Individual owner are scared of the tax consequence (problem of informal sector) • Structure of housing finance subsidies and taxes – user cost problem („It is cheaper to buy than to rent”) • Lack of political commitment – rhetoric versus budget expenditures Metropolitan Research Institute

More Related