1 / 12

On the Effects of Immediate Feedback

Technion Israeli Institute of Technology. The Max-Wertheimer Minerva Center for Cognitive Processes and Human Performance. On the Effects of Immediate Feedback. Ido Erev, Adi Luria & Annan Erev. Background. Immediate Feedback: Good or Bad?.

bethan
Télécharger la présentation

On the Effects of Immediate Feedback

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Technion Israeli Institute of Technology The Max-Wertheimer Minerva Center for Cognitive Processes and Human Performance On the Effects of Immediate Feedback Ido Erev, Adi Luria & Annan Erev

  2. Background Immediate Feedback: Good or Bad? Past research on Immediate feedback has yielded mixed results. In general: • Field Studies show positive effects for immediate feedback • Controlled laboratory experiments show negative effects of immediate feedback

  3. Theoretical Propositions The present study suggests that immediate feedback has 2 main effects: • A negative Guidance effect - over reliance on recent feedback • A positive Association effect- better understanding of the relationship between outcomes & causes

  4. Theoretical Propositions It is suggested that past laboratory research used strictly controlled paradigms which “controlled out” positive effects - guidance may be less robust than previously thought

  5. Hypotheses A minimal modification of the classic guidance paradigm may be sufficient to reverse the original pattern • In multi-task situations, immediate feedback will lead to better performance than delayed feedback

  6. Method Green: 0.75 sec Error in seconds Ready? Start Basic task:Basic Feedback: The subjects’ task was to respond to the stimulus with two presses on the enter key, such that the interval between the two presses would be (as close as possible to) 750 milliseconds. In the immediate feedback condition, subjects were shown the performance graph after every trial; in the delayed feedback condition, subjects received performance feedback (for every trial) at the end of each 15-trial block.

  7. Study 1– Basic Task 1 Color, 1 Reaction time Replication of Guidance Paradigm Task: response to 1 colored stimulus Conditions: 1) Immediate Fdbk 2) Delayed Fdbk Method: 1) Practice with Fdbk 2) 10-min Retention (no Fdbk.) 3) 2-day Retention (no Fdbk.)

  8. Practice with feedback 10-min no feedback 2-day no feedback Study 1– Results Replication of Guidance Effect Mean Abs. Error (ms) Immediate feedback improved practice performance but harmed retention/transfer performance

  9. Study 2– Modified Task 4 Colors, 4 Reaction times Reversing the Guidance Effect Task: response to 4 colors, each with its own reaction time (4 reaction times) Conditions: same Method: same

  10. Practice with feedback 10-min no feedback 2-day no feedback Study 2– Results Reversing the Guidance Effect Mean Abs. Error (ms) In 4-color paradigm, immediate feedback improves practice performance AS WELL AS transfer/retention performance

  11. Explaining the Results: Increase in number of possible responses has 2 effects: • Reduces effectiveness of best response to last (i.e. reduces guidance) • Increases the need for association inherent in immediate feedback An increase in the number of possible responses gave immediate feedback an advantage over delayed

  12. Conclusions • Dominance of guidance effects may be less robust than previously thought • One way to counter negative guidance effects may be to increase number of possible responses. • Relationship to emphasis change training (Gopher et al., 1989): Variability leads to more effective learning.

More Related