1 / 18

Coverage and Energy Tradeoff in Density Control on Sensor Networks

Coverage and Energy Tradeoff in Density Control on Sensor Networks. Yi Shang and Hongchi Shi University of Missouri-Columbia ICPADS’05. Outline. Introduction Density Control Protocols NODC vs. OGDC DODCD NODCA Experimental Results Conclusions. Introduction. Density Control

Télécharger la présentation

Coverage and Energy Tradeoff in Density Control on Sensor Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Coverage and Energy Tradeoff in Density Control on Sensor Networks Yi Shang and Hongchi ShiUniversity of Missouri-Columbia ICPADS’05

  2. Outline • Introduction Density Control Protocols • NODC vs. OGDC • DODCD • NODCA • Experimental Results • Conclusions

  3. Introduction • Density Control • a technique for prolonging network’s lifetime while providing sufficient sensing coverage • determine when and which sensors should be powered up and which should power saving • Different applications require different degrees of sensing coverage • complete coverage • high percentage coverage • This paper consider the tradeoff between energy usage and coverage

  4. Density Control Protocols • NODC vs. OGDC ( Non-Overlapping vs. Optimal Geographical) NODCGap= (9.31%) GODCOverlap= (20.9%)

  5. Density Control Protocols • Assumptions • interested sensing space is much larger than the sensing range of each sensor node • radio range is at least twice of the sensing range • Each node knows its position

  6. Density Control Protocols • States: ON/OFF/Undecided • Selection of starting node • selecting starting node with probability pif its power exceeds a pre-determined threshold Pt • sets a backoff timer of τ1 seconds • broadcast a power-on message after backoff • position of the sender • direction α : uniform distribution in [0, 2π]

  7. Density Control Protocols • States: ON/OFF/Undecided • Selection of starting node • selecting starting node with probability pif its power exceeds a pre-determined threshold Pt • sets a backoff timer of τ1 seconds • broadcast a power-on message after backoff • position of the sender • direction α : uniform distribution in [0, 2π]

  8. Density Control Protocols • Actions: when receiving a power-on message • checks the ratio of its sensing area covered by its “ON” neighbors to its overall sensing area is over a predetermined threshold (turn-off threshold θ) • Rule R1: first power-on message received from starting node • Rule R2: first power-on message received from non-starting node • Rule R3: second power-on message received • Rule R4: receive more than two power-on messages

  9. Rule1 Rule3

  10. A B C A B C D D Density Control Protocols Rule4: receive more than two power-on messages • None of the coverage areas of the senders overlaps • previous senders do not overlap andnew sender overlaps with previous senders • previous senders do not overlap and new sender overlaps with previous senders

  11. ONDCDDensity Control Protocol Based on Distances • NODCD does not require the location information • Rule R1: The message is the first power-on message received. • Rule R2: More than one power-on messages have been received.

  12. ONDCADensity Control with Adjustable Sensing Ranges • Turn-off threshold θ, 0 ≤ θ ≤ 1, • Two iterations as follows The optimal values of θ, r2 ????

  13. Experimental Results • region of interest : 50m x 50m square. • sensing range: rs= 5m. • constant c = 10/rs2

  14. Experimental Results 88% vs. 85% 41 vs. 34 75 vs. 75

  15. Experimental Results

  16. Experimental Results

  17. Conclusions • three new density control protocols that apply new strategies in trading the coverage vs. energy usage • distributed • easy to implement • low computation/communication costs

More Related