1 / 12

IEEE competency initiative

IEEE competency initiative. October 2006. IEEE. International standards organization Electrical, Electronics, Computer Membership = individuals rather than institutions (e.g. IMS) or nations (e.g. ISO) ISO accredited, open standards publication process

bill
Télécharger la présentation

IEEE competency initiative

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IEEE competency initiative October 2006

  2. IEEE • International standards organization • Electrical, Electronics, Computer • Membership = individuals rather than institutions (e.g. IMS) or nations (e.g. ISO) • ISO accredited, open standards publication process • Pragmatic. Based on or enabling realistic best practices • High quality. Formal ISO accredited balloting and comment resolution processes to reach consensus

  3. LTSC • Learning Technology Standards Committee of the IEEE • Started 1995. • First projects: • Learning System Architecture reference model • Learning Object Metadata • Several standards used in SCORM • Now finishing “Reusable Competency Definition”

  4. New initiative • Several key members of LTSC are coordinating with other organizations to work toward new standards • Maybe in LTSC, maybe in an new committee. • Process: Form study group(s) to study possible standards projects • Output of a study group: Recommendation in terms of a Project Approval Request (or recommendation not to proceed, or to reframe the problem)

  5. Candidate standard projects • Leveraging Reusable Competency Definitions (pub 2007) • Ranging in scope from • Competency Framework (vast) to • Objective statements (small) • Need to identify other worthy projects • Pragmatic, e.g. “maps of competency definitions” • Needed: Practical, down to earth semantics representations • Underlying framework: Semantic interoperability. Standardize or document best practices for some Semantics-based processes, services, data models

  6. Plan • Study groups starting 2006 • Who? Anyone with a material interest • Begin standards projects 2007 • “Speclets” rather than huge standards • Avoid the “every desirable feature” syndrome • Leverage existing experience • Contact: • ieeeltsc.org • Claude Ostyn, Chair LTSC WG20 • Robby Robson, IEEE LTSC • Wayne Hodgins, Chair LTSC WG12

  7. Leveraging Ontologies and Semanticsin Competency Standards

  8. Ontologies and semantic modeling for competencies Sources Ontologies at various levels of scope, size, depth and quality

  9. Ontologies and semantic modeling for competencies Sources Ontologies at various levels of scope, size, depth and quality Lifecycle Updates Maintenance Evolution Semantic interoperability Terminology issues

  10. Ontologies and semantic modeling for competencies Sources Pragmatic support for different applications and domains Ontologies at various levels of scope, size, depth and quality Generate Generate Generate

  11. Ontologies and semantic modeling for competencies Sources Pragmatic support for different applications and domains Ontologies at various levels of scope, size, depth and quality Generate Generate Generate

More Related