1 / 11

Brown and Livenson’s

Politeness Theory. Brown and Livenson’s. “Politeness” and “Face”. “Politeness” is the word we use to talk about a speaker’s intention to threaten or save face of a hearer. Positive Face: “the want of every member that his wants be desirable to at least some others“ .

bin
Télécharger la présentation

Brown and Livenson’s

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Politeness Theory Brown and Livenson’s

  2. “Politeness” and “Face” “Politeness” is the word we use to talk about a speaker’s intention to threaten or save face of a hearer. Positive Face: “the want of every member that his wants be desirable to at least some others“ Face is our self imagine that we attempt to show the world. Negative Face: "the want of every 'competent adult member' that his actions be unimpeded by others", or "the basic claim to territories, personal preserves, rights to non-distraction--i.e. the freedom of action and freedom from imposition".[ Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  3. So basically… Negative Face: Don’t bother me. Ever. Positive Face: LIKE ME!

  4. Face Threatening Acts FTAs • an utterance or tone that damages the face of the addressee or the speaker by acting in opposition to the wants and desires of the other. Positive FTAs Can be damaging to both the speaker and the hearer Negative FTAs Can be damaging to both the speaker and the hearer There are Politeness Strategies that speakers can employ to achieve different levels of FTAs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politeness_theory#cite_note-BandL-2

  5. We have a choice whether or not to do the FTA, and if we do, how we will go about it. Without redressive action, baldly Lesser Estimation of risk of face loss On record With redressive action Do the FTA Positive Politeness Off record Negative Politeness Don’t do the FTA Greater Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press.

  6. Positive Politeness Negative Politeness Bald On-Record Politeness Strategies Off-Record (indirect)

  7. Bald On-Record No attempt to minimize the threat to a hearer’s face – can cause shock and embarrassment. “Shut up!” “Turn off the lights.” http://youtu.be/_H747FiGPp0 In this video clip of The Office, Andy makes a direct request of Jim (you can stop at 9 seconds). This threatens Jim’s face in that Andy makes no attempt to “dress up” the demand. Brown and Livenson suggest that Bad On-Record politeness strategies tend to be used between people with a close relationship or during times or urgency (“get out of the way!”). You can minimize the threat of Bald On-Record demands just by the nature of the demand. “Come hang out with me.” “Come in!”

  8. Positive Politeness The speaker attempts to reduce threat to the hearer’s face by dressing up the utterance. • Strategies may include statements showing unity or belonging in some way. • Example: So because we’re such great friends, would you mind driving me to the airport? Nope.

  9. Directed towards the hearer’s negative face and really tries to avoid imposition on the hearer. Negative Politeness • Apologizing: • I’m sorry, but would you please flip the light? • Plural nouns: • We at the institution regret to inform you… • A few ways to do this include: • Being pessimistic: • I know this is a terrible favor for me to ask… • Minimizing the imposition: • I have a tiny favor to ask you…

  10. Off-Record (indirect) • Not actually saying what you mean, but implying it to avoid the hearer losing face Not actually saying what you mean, but implying it to avoid the hearer losing face http://youtu.be/_H747FiGPp0?t=30s In this same clip from The Office (start at 30 seconds if it doesn’t automatically jump there), Jim asks if there is any music. What he means is, “Your’re terribly boring and awkward and I need a distraction.” When Andy does his own special little thing, Jim clarifies his request at the end. Other examples include: “Boy, I’m hungry.” Translation: Make me a sandwich ASAP, honey.

  11. What does it look like in ASL? How will we adjust our English interpretations? Teaming? So how can we apply this Politeness Theory and its strategies to our work? You can add ideas, share stories, or just lurk in Moodle How do we produce equivalent ASL messages using these strategies? Talking with consumers?

More Related