1 / 45

Stochastic Simulation of Ground Motion Components for a Specified Design Scenario

Stochastic Simulation of Ground Motion Components for a Specified Design Scenario. Sanaz Rezaeian Armen Der Kiureghian (PI) University of California, Berkeley. Sponsor: State of California through Transportation Systems Research

binta
Télécharger la présentation

Stochastic Simulation of Ground Motion Components for a Specified Design Scenario

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Stochastic Simulation of Ground Motion Components for a Specified Design Scenario SanazRezaeian ArmenDerKiureghian (PI) University of California, Berkeley Sponsor: State of California through Transportation Systems Research Program of Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER)

  2. Outline: • Motivation • Ground motion model • Extend to simulate multiple components • Principal axes of ground motions • High correlations between model parameters • Example • Conclusion

  3. Motivation: • In seismic hazard analysis, development of design ground motions is a crucial step. • High levels of intensity • Expected structural behavior: Nonlinear • Approach: Response-history dynamic analysis • Requires: Ground motion time-series

  4. Motivation: • In seismic hazard analysis, development of design ground motions is a crucial step. • High levels of intensity • Expected structural behavior: Nonlinear • Approach: Response-history dynamic analysis • Requires: Ground motion time-series • Difficulties come from scarcity of previously recorded motions. • Controversies come from methods of selecting and modifying real records. • Alternative: Use simulated time-series in conjunction or in the place of real records.

  5. Motivation: • In seismic hazard analysis, development of design ground motions is a crucial step. • High levels of intensity • Expected structural behavior: Nonlinear • Approach: Response-history dynamic analysis • Requires: Ground motion time-series • Our Goal: Earthquake and site characteristics  Suite of simulated time-series • (F, M, Rrup, Vs30) Site VS30: Shear wave velocity of top 30m Controlling Fault F: Faulting mechanism M: Moment magnitude … R: Closest distance to ruptured area

  6. Motivation: • In seismic hazard analysis, development of design ground motions is a crucial step. • High levels of intensity • Expected structural behavior: Nonlinear • Approach: Response-history dynamic analysis • Requires: Ground motion time-series • Our Goal: Earthquake and site characteristics  Suite of simulated time-series • (F, M, Rrup, Vs30) • For 2D/3D structural analysis, need ground motion components. Site VS30: Shear wave velocity of top 30m Controlling Fault F: Faulting mechanism M: Moment magnitude … R: Closest distance to ruptured area

  7. Ground Motion Model: [Rezaeian and Der Kiureghian, 2008]

  8. Ground Motion Model: [Rezaeian and Der Kiureghian, 2008] Acceleration time-series

  9. Ground Motion Model: [Rezaeian and Der Kiureghian, 2008] Temporal non-stationarity: Variation of intensity in time Spectral non-stationarity: Variation of frequency content in time

  10. Ground Motion Model: [Rezaeian and Der Kiureghian, 2008] Source of stochasticity

  11. Ground Motion Model: [Rezaeian and Der Kiureghian, 2008] Impulse response function (IRF) corresponding to pseudo-acceleration response of a SDOF linear oscillator

  12. Ground Motion Model: [Rezaeian and Der Kiureghian, 2008] Duhamel’s integral (superposition of filter responses to a sequence of statistically independent pulses with the time of application τ)

  13. Ground Motion Model: [Rezaeian and Der Kiureghian, 2008]

  14. Ground Motion Model: [Rezaeian and Der Kiureghian, 2008]

  15. Ground Motion Model: [Rezaeian and Der Kiureghian, 2008] 0timetn

  16. Ground Motion Model: [Rezaeian and Der Kiureghian, 2008] Non-zero residuals! Over estimates response spectrum at long periods!

  17. Ground Motion Model: [Rezaeian and Der Kiureghian, 2008] Critically damped oscillator

  18. Ground Motion Model: [Rezaeian and Der Kiureghian, 2008]

  19. Model Parameters:

  20. Model Parameters: Modulating function parameters: Filter parameters: : Frequency at the middle of strong shaking : Arias intensity : Rate of change of frequency over time : Effective duration, between 5% to 95% Ia : Damping ratio : Time at the middle of strong shaking, at 45% Ia

  21. Model Parameters: Modulating function parameters: Filter parameters: : Frequency at the middle of strong shaking : Arias intensity : Rate of change of frequency over time : Effective duration, between 5% to 95% Ia : Damping ratio : Time at the middle of strong shaking, at 45% Ia

  22. Model Parameters: Modulating function parameters: Filter parameters: 0.15 0 Acceleration, g Recorded : Frequency at the middle of strong shaking : Arias intensity -0.25 0 40 Time, sec : Rate of change of frequency over time : Effective duration, between 5% to 95% Ia : Damping ratio : Time at the middle of strong shaking, at 45% Ia Model parameters are identified for many recorded motions to develop predictive equations in terms of F, M, R, VS30 • Match • statistical • characteristics • Representing: • Intensity • Frequency • Bandwidth Identify model parameters Ia, tmid, D5-95 ωmid, ω’, ζ

  23. Two Horizontal Components: Component 1: Component 2:

  24. Two Horizontal Components: Component 1: Component 2: source of stochasticity • w1(τ) and w2(τ) are statistically independent if along the principal axes.

  25. Two Horizontal Components: Component 1: Component 2: source of stochasticity Expected Epicenter Site Horizontal Plane • w1(τ) and w2(τ) are statistically independent if along the principal axes. • Principal Axes of Ground Motion: • A set of orthogonal axes along which the components are uncorrelated. Minor • Penzien and Watabe (1975) Major Intermediate

  26. Two Horizontal Components: Component 1: Component 2: source of stochasticity • w1(τ) and w2(τ) are statistically independent if along the principal axes. • Principal Axes of Ground Motion: • A set of orthogonal axes along which the components are uncorrelated. Rotate recorded motions in the database. a2,θ ρa1 , a2≠ 0 a2 θ Site ρa1,θ , a2,θ = 0 a1,θ Horizontal Plane a1

  27. Rotating Recorded Motions: Northridge earthquake recorded at Mt. Wilson Station

  28. Two Horizontal Components: Component 1: Component 2:

  29. Two Horizontal Components: Component 1: Component 2: • Predictive equations: if if

  30. Two Horizontal Components: Component 1: Component 2: • Predictive equations: if if Model parameter p transformed to the standard normal space

  31. Two Horizontal Components: Component 1: Component 2: • Predictive equations: if if Predicted mean conditioned on earthquake and site characteristics Independent normally-distributed errors

  32. Two Horizontal Components: Component 1: Component 2: • Predictive equations. • High correlations expected between parameters of the two components.

  33. Two Horizontal Components: Correlation Matrix: Major Component (larger Arias intensity) Intermediate Component (smaller Arias intensity) Major Component Symmetric Intermediate Component

  34. Two Horizontal Components: Correlation Matrix: Major Component (larger Arias intensity) Intermediate Component (smaller Arias intensity) Major Component Symmetric Intermediate Component

  35. Two Horizontal Components: Correlation Matrix: Major Component (larger Arias intensity) Intermediate Component (smaller Arias intensity) Major Component Symmetric Intermediate Component

  36. Two Horizontal Components: Correlation Matrix: Major Component (larger Arias intensity) Intermediate Component (smaller Arias intensity) Major Component Symmetric Intermediate Component

  37. Example: Design scenario: F = 1 (Reverse) , M = 7.35 , R =14 km , VS30 = 660 m/s

  38. Example: Design scenario: F = 1 (Reverse) , M = 7.35 , R =14 km , VS30 = 660 m/s Major Component Intermediate Component

  39. Example: Design scenario: F = 1 (Reverse) , M = 7.35 , R =14 km , VS30 = 660 m/s 0.1 Recorded Recorded Major Component Intermediate Component 0 -0.1 Acceleration, g 0.1 Simulated Simulated 0 -0.1 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80 Time, s Time, s 0.05 Simulated Simulated 0 -0.05

  40. Example: Design scenario: F = 1 (Reverse) , M = 7.35 , R =14 km , VS30 = 660 m/s 0.01 Recorded Recorded Major Component Intermediate Component 0 -0.01 Simulated Simulated Velocity, m/s Simulated Simulated 0.05 0 -0.05 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80 Time, s Time, s 0.05 0 -0.05

  41. Example: Design scenario: F = 1 (Reverse) , M = 7.35 , R =14 km , VS30 = 660 m/s 0.02 Recorded Recorded Major Component Intermediate Component 0 -0.02 Simulated Simulated Displacement, m Simulated Simulated 0.05 Time, s Time, s 0 -0.05 0.05 0 -0.05 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80

  42. Conclusion: • Developed a stochastic model for earthquake ground motion components • Created a database of principal ground motion components • Identified model parameters for the records in the database •  predictive equations for model parameters in terms of F , M , R, VS30 • Identified correlation coefficients between model parameters of the components • For given F , M , R, VS30 , correlated model parameters are randomly simulated and used along with statistically independent white-noise processes to generate a pair of horizontal ground motion components in the directions of principal axes. • The proposed methods can be easily extended to simulate the vertical component.

  43. Related Publications: • Rezaeian S, DerKiureghian A. "A stochastic ground motion model with separable temporal and spectral nonstationarities”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2008, Vol. 37, pp. 1565-1584. Rezaeian S, DerKiureghian A. "Simulation of synthetic ground motions for specified earthquake and site characteristics”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2010, Vol. 39, pp. 1155-1180. Rezaeian S, DerKiureghian A. "Simulation of orthogonal horizontal ground motion components for specified earthquake and site characteristics”, Submitted to Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics.

  44. Thank You • This project was made possible with support from: • State of California through Transportation Systems Research Program of Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER TSRP).

  45. Ground Motion Model: Advantages Extra • Small number of parameters that have physical meaning and can be easily identified by matching with features of a given accelerogram • Completely separable temporal and spectral nonstationary characteristics, which facilitates identification and interpretation of the parameters • No need for sophisticated processing of the target accelerogram, e.g. Fourier analysis or estimation of evolutionary PSD • Simple simulation of sample functions, requiring little more than generation of standard normal random variables • Form of the model facilitates nonlinear random vibration analysis (e.g., by using TELM).

More Related