1 / 8

Introduction to Sellars and Quine

Introduction to Sellars and Quine. Pete Mandik Chairman, Department of Philosophy Coordinator, Cognitive Science Laboratory William Paterson University, New Jersey USA. Two Giants. Wilfrid Sellars 1912-1989 Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind (1956) Willard van Orman Quine 1908-2000

birch
Télécharger la présentation

Introduction to Sellars and Quine

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Introduction to Sellars and Quine Pete Mandik Chairman, Department of Philosophy Coordinator, Cognitive Science Laboratory William Paterson University, New Jersey USA

  2. Two Giants • Wilfrid Sellars • 1912-1989 • Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind (1956) • Willard van Orman Quine • 1908-2000 • Word and Object (1960)

  3. Sellars and Quine vs. Positivism • Both revolutionized analytic philosophy by opposing Logical Positivism aka Logical Empiricism

  4. Logical Positivism • “…restated the foundationalist epistemology of British empiricism…” (EPM p.2) • Verifiability Principle- All truths are either analytic (logical tautologies) or synthetic (knowable through sensory perception) • Sense Datum Theory- Everything known by the senses is reducible to constructions of sense data

  5. Quine • Attacked the Verifiability Principle by attacking the Analytic/synthetic distinction

  6. Sellars • Attacked Sense Datum Theory by attacking the “Myth of the Given” and the “bad philosophical habit which the British empiricists took over from Descartes--the habit of asking whether the mind ever succeeds in making unmediated contact with [the] world, and remaining skeptical about the status of knowledge-claims until such contact can be shown to exist” (EPM p. 9)

  7. Sellars and the Myth • “Intuitions without concepts are blind.” (EPM p. 3) • “All awareness…is a linguistic affair” (EPM p. 4) • “Locke, Berkeley, and Hume were wrong in thinking that we are ‘aware…simply by having sensations and images’.” (ibid.) • “in characterizing an episode or a state as that of knowing, we are not giving an empirical desription of that episode or state; we are placing it in the logical space of reasons, of justifying and being able to justify what one says” (ibid.)

  8. THE END

More Related