html5-img
1 / 36

Continuous Support in Labor: An Underused Evidence-Based Practice

Continuous Support in Labor: An Underused Evidence-Based Practice. Liza Goldman Huertas, MD Obstetrics Rotation Dept. of Family & Social Medicine. Agenda. Review some overused harmful practices and underused beneficial practices in maternity care in the U.S.

blake
Télécharger la présentation

Continuous Support in Labor: An Underused Evidence-Based Practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Continuous Support in Labor: An Underused Evidence-Based Practice Liza Goldman Huertas, MD Obstetrics Rotation Dept. of Family & Social Medicine

  2. Agenda • Review some overused harmful practices and underused beneficial practices in maternity care in the U.S. • Case related to continuous support in labor • Define continuous support in labor • Review evidence for doula care • Relate doula care to other aspects of evidence-based maternity care • Identify pts most likely to benefit from doula care • Discuss implications for our practice

  3. Room for Improvement: Maternity Care in the U.S. • The U.S. has some of the highest infant mortality rates among industrialized countries… and is falling in ranking: 29th among countries, tied with Poland and Slovakia (CDC) • In 2007, CDC reported an increase in U.S. maternal mortality rates • Despite highest cost, best technology

  4. Infant Mortality Ranking

  5. Infant and Maternal Mortality Complex social phenomena with many contributing factors: • Overall Socioeconomic wellbeing of society • Social Status of women and subgroups of O+: economic opportunities, education, safety • Nutrition, health status of vulnerable women • Obesity and Diabetes • Access to health care: 1°, prenatal, preventive • Prematurity, LBW, C-section rate, IVF/multiples, early inductions

  6. Expensive

  7. Evidence-Based Maternity Care: The Millbank Report • High rates of interventions with risks of adverse effects (overused practices) • Highlighted Overused Practices: Labor Induction, Epidural & Spinal Analgesia, C-Section, Continuous EFM, Rupture of Membranes, Episiotomy, Certain Routine Prenatal Screening Practices • Beneficial underused interventions

  8. Induction of Labor • Theoretical concerns: pitocin may interfere with physiologic oxyctocin function in PPH, bonding, breastfeeding; iatrogenic prematurity in infant, ?Effects on brain development in final 1-2 wks of pregnancy (in-utero vs. ex-utero) • Increased rates of C/S in 1st time mothers • Increased EFM • More epidural analgesia • More assisted delivery • Increases cost

  9. Epidural & Spinal Analgesia • Maternal effects: immobility, voiding difficulty, sedation, fever, hypotension, longer 2nd stage, perineal tears • Increased IVF, BP monitoring, EFM, bladder cath, pitocin, meds for hypotension, forceps or vacuum delivery, episiotomy • Under some conditions, likelihood of C/S • Fetal /newborn risks: fetal tachycardia & bradycardia, hyperbilirubinemia, sepsis workups, more abx, lower newborn assessment scores • Increased Cost

  10. C-Section • Life-saving for absolute indications: cord pro-lapse, previa, abruption, persistant transverse. • Increases risk of: maternal death, surgical injury, PPH, emergent hyst, DVT, CVA, infection, pro-longed hosp/rehosp, intense & prolonged pain, bowel obstruction, poor birth experience, poor mental health & overall functioning, abruption, previa, accreta, uterine rupture, infertility • For infants: iatrogenic prematurity, LBW, stillbirth, respiratory problems, failure to BF • Increased risk with repeat C/S.

  11. Case Study • 16yo P0 @40 and 6 undergoing IOL. No prenatal issues. No PMH. • Pt’s mother & older sister present at bedside. Older sister has scrubs on; bilingual, assertive, asks questions. • FOB to be present . FOB and pt are not close but FOB is traveling from Boston to be present. • Nursing staff comes into conflict with family over policy of 2 family members only. • Nursing staff increasingly annoyed.

  12. Case Study p2 • Initially coping well with contractions, surprising the nurses. Hoping to avoid epidural analgesia. • Mother becomes B’s only support. She speaks only Spanish. Anxious, distrusts staff & quiet when staff present. • B is increasingly frustrated. Wants to eat, go to the bathroom. Uncomfortable lying down. Does not want FOB present for vaginal exams. Caregivers express annoyance outside room. • Frequency/intensity of contractions increase, B gets desperate and decides to get an epidural.

  13. Case Study p3 • B’s mother upset because she feels B would be coping better with pain if her sister was present. (Sister left because security was called earlier). • Anesthesiology delayed in OR. • B yells at mother & providers, demands epidural, increasingly suffering & terrified. • B eventually gets epidural, comfortable again. • Epidural is dense and B can barely move her legs. Progress slows. Pitocin is titrated up. • FHR pattern becomes increasingly concerning. • C-section discussed.

  14. Case Study p4 • 2nd stage complicated by “poor maternal effort”. Providers tell pt she isn’t doing her job, needs to put in real effort. Fear, frustration turns to yelling. • As B pushes her baby out, room goes quiet. The baby’s head is blueish.Tight nuchal cord x3. • No exclamations of joy as infant resuscitated. Doctors complete their care of the mother. • Infant improves quickly but pt & mother are not updated. Anxiety & grief are palpable. • An hour later, when doctors & nurses are finished taking care of her, B cries inconsolably. She is not interested in holding her baby.

  15. Selected Underused Interventions • Midwives & Family Physicians • Smoking Cessation for Pregnant Women • Prematurity Prevention: Centering Pregnancy • External Version to Turn Breech Babies • Delayed and Spontaneous Pushing • Non-pharmacologic measures to relieve pain, promote comfort & labor progress • Non-supine positions

  16. More Underused Interventions • Early Skin to Skin Contact • Breastfeeding & BF Interventions (e.g. Baby Friendly Hospitals) • Psychosocial Interventions for Post-partum Depression • Continuous Support in Labor

  17. What is Continuous Support in Labor • Continuous presence • Emotional support • Advice regarding comfort measures and coping • Patient education • Advocacy on behalf of the laboring woman

  18. Doulas in the United States • Non-medical providers of labor support • Ancient Greek meaning woman of service • Provide emotional support, physical comfort, objective view, support informed decision-making, facilitate communication, advocacy • Provide support to partners and family • May also be interpreters & cultural brokers • Several accreditation organizations • Postpartum doulas, end of life doulas.

  19. Why Would Doula Care Help? Theories • May mediate effect of birth environment: Buffers to unfamiliar, stressful environments. • Enhancing maternal feelings of confidence & control, reducing reliance on medical interventions. • Potential to limit “cascade of interventions” by enhancing labor physiology

  20. Why Would Doula Care Help? Labor Physiology • Intervene on stress response--> increased epi--> can effect FHR pattern, catecho-lamines decrease uterine contractility, prolong labors--> lower APGARs • Enhanced feto-pelvic relationships (mobility, gravity, preferred positions)

  21. Why Would Doula Care Help? Possible Longterm Impact • Adjustment to parenthood, self-image, feelings of competence & confidence • Mother-infant Bonding • Breastfeeding • Postpartum depression • Role modeling: nurturing mother, infant, and family. • Encouraging healthy family relationships

  22. Cochrane Intervention Review: Use this practice! • First Do No Harm: No evidence of harm from continuous support in labor has been reported. • Major Outcomes: increased chance of NSVD (decreased C/S, forceps and vacuum), less likely to use pain medications, greater satisfaction with the childbirth experience, slightly shorter labors.

  23. Cochrane Intervention Review (Meta-Analysis) 2007 • 16 trials, 11 countries, 13,000 women • Controlled trials: support person could be certified professional or trained family member • Outcomes included: pitocin, EFM, pharmacologic analgesia, severe pain, labor length, SVD, C/S, episiotomy, perineal trauma, low APGARS, low cord pH, NICU, anxiety during labor, perception of low control, longer term maternal outcomes • Subgroup Analysis: effects of childbirth environment, provider of care, timing of care

  24. Cochrane: What doulas can do • Increase NSVDs (double in some cases) • Decrease regional analgesia, any analgesia • Decrease vacuum, forceps, C sections • Fewer negative childbirth experiences • Slightly shorter labor length, less than 1 hr difference (effect diluted by trials involving staff doulas)

  25. Subgroup Analysis: Care most effective • When provided by person who was not a member of the hospital staff • In settings where epidural analgesia was not routinely used • When started early in labor--> Evidence of dose-response phenomenon

  26. Insufficient Data (Cochrane could not assess) • Mother’s and infants wellbeing postpartum • Perineal trauma • Relationship between woman and partner • Urinary and fecal incontinence

  27. Conclusions from Authors of Cochrane Review • Continuous support should be the norm not exception! • Birth environments should afford privacy, be empowering and non-stressful • Birth environments should not be characterized by routine interventions that add risk without clear benefit

  28. Evidence of Longterm Benefit in Smaller Trials • Higher rates of breastfeeding at 6 weeks • Improved mother-infant bonding • Decreased rates of postpartum depression • Increased confidence in & perception of ease of parenting • Positive maternal self-image and positive perception of body • Needs more study to corroborate.

  29. May have particular benefit for certain groups • Young women, especially teens • Low income women • Women of color, Black women & Latinas • Doula programs for Spanish-, Vietnamese-, and Somali-speaking immigrant women • Incarcerated women • Women laboring alone

  30. Implications for Family Physicians?

  31. References • Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD003766. • Stuebe, A. Continuous intrapartum support. In: UpToDate, Basow, DS (Ed), UpToDate, Waltham, MA, 2009. • Sakala, C and Corry, MP. Evidence-Based Maternity Care: What It Is and What It Can Achieve. 2008. • Newton KN, Chaudhuri J, Grossman X, Merewood A. Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding among Latina women giving birth at an inner-city baby-friendly hospital. J Hum Lact. 2009 Feb;25(1):28-33. • Dundek LH. Establishment of a Somali doula program at a large metropolitan hospital. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Apr-Jun;20(2):128-37. • Schroeder C, Bell J. Doula birth support for incarcerated pregnant women. Public Health Nurs. 2005 Jan-Feb;22(1):53-8. • Lantz PM, Low LK, Varkey S, Watson RL. Doulas as childbirth paraprofessionals: results from a national survey. Womens Health Issues. 2005 May-Jun;15(3):109-16. • Stein MT, Kennell JH, Fulcher A. Benefits of a doula present at the birth of a child. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2003 Jun;24(3):195-8. • www.dona.org, www.childbirthconnection.org

More Related