1 / 28

The San Francisco HIV Prevention Strategy, 2012-2016: An Integrated, Citywide Approach

The San Francisco HIV Prevention Strategy, 2012-2016: An Integrated, Citywide Approach. HIV Prevention Planning Council November 8, 2012. HPPC Work Group. SFDPH Staff. Laurel Bristow, HPS Dara Geckeler, HPS Emalie Huriaux, HPS Kevin Hutchcroft, HHS Eileen Loughran, HPS Oscar Macias, HPS

blithe
Télécharger la présentation

The San Francisco HIV Prevention Strategy, 2012-2016: An Integrated, Citywide Approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The San Francisco HIV Prevention Strategy, 2012-2016:An Integrated, Citywide Approach HIV Prevention Planning Council November 8, 2012

  2. HPPC Work Group SFDPH Staff Laurel Bristow, HPS Dara Geckeler, HPS Emalie Huriaux, HPS Kevin Hutchcroft, HHS Eileen Loughran, HPS Oscar Macias, HPS Jenna Rapues, HPS • Richard Bargetto • Chadwick Campbell • David Gonzalez • Paul Harkin • Aja Monet (co-chair) • Jessie Murphy • Kyriell Noon • Frank Strona • Laura Thomas • Channing Wayne (co-chair)

  3. Timeline for Engagement & Review • August 9th HPPC Meeting: HPS provided overview of Jurisdictional Plan, identified need for work group, and timeline. HPPC executive committee established the Work Group (WG). • August 20th HHSPC Meeting: HPS provided overview of the process for developing the Strategy and invited participation of HHSPC members on the WG. • August 27th Meeting with Marin & San Mateo Counties: HPS met with the counties to provide an overview and determine how the counties will include their strategies. • September 4th HPPC WG Meeting: The WG provided feedback about what should be included in the Strategy. • September 14th HIV Testing Coordinators Meeting: HPS provided an overview of the process. • September 20th Joint HPS & HHS Meeting: HPS provided an overview of the process and garnered feedback about how to include care & treatment info. • October 1st HPPC WG Meeting: The WG provided feedback on the initial draft • October 5th HIV/AIDS Providers Network Meeting: HPS provided an overview of the process. • October 10th HPPC WG Meeting: The WG provided feedback on the draft. • October 16th Transgender Advisory Group Meeting: HPS provided an overview of the process. • October 22nd HPPC WG Meeting: The WG voted to approve the draft. • October 25th HPPC Executive Committee Meeting: The Committee reviewed the draft and approved the presentation. • November 8th HPPC Meeting: HPPC votes on concurrence

  4. The SF HIV Prevention Strategy 5-year plan (2012-2016) required by CDC The Strategy outlines “the vision” Due December 30, 2012 Will update annually, as needed

  5. Steps in the planning process

  6. Shared Roles/Responsibilities of SFDPH & HPPC Ensure collaboration and coordination of HIV prevention, care, and treatment services. Ensure that the SF Strategy aligns with the goals of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy. Ensure services and resources are directed and disseminated to the areas with the greatest HIV burden.

  7. Roles/Responsibilities HPPC Inform the development of the SF Strategy. SFDPH • Submit the SF Strategy to CDC.

  8. The SF Strategy is guided by… Five components of “high-impact prevention”: • Effectiveness and cost; • Feasibility of full-scale implementation; • Coverage in the target population; • Interaction and targeting of interventions; and • Emphasis on interventions that will have the greatest overall potential to reduce HIV infections.

  9. “The Letter” Letter to CDC from HPPC, including: Documentation that HPPC was informed regarding the development of the Strategy; Description of the process used to review it; Concurrence, concurrence w/ reservations, or non-concurrence.

  10. Concurrence Programmatic activities and resources are being allocated to the most disproportionately affected populations and geographical areas that bear the greatest burden of HIV disease, including populations at greatest risk of HIV transmission and acquisition. (definition from CDC’s community planning guidance) or The Strategy matches the information (e.g., epidemiology, community knowledge/experience).

  11. Review of Strategy Narrative

  12. Introduction(pp. 11-14) Local Epidemiology The San Francisco HIV Prevention Strategy Goals and Objectives Underlying Principles Summary

  13. The HIV Prevention, Care & Treatment Cascade(pp. 15-18) Viral suppression, achieved through secondary and tertiary prevention efforts, is ultimately a primary prevention strategy for HIV-negative individuals. Thus, secondary and tertiary prevention activities for PLWHA are primary prevention for HIV-negative people, even those HIV negative individuals who never come into direct contact with any HIV prevention effort.

  14. Gaps and Needs in HIV Prevention, Care & Treatment(pp. 19-25) • Gaps Along the Cascade: A Quantitative Perspective • Community Needs: A Qualitative Perspective • Populations with Significant Barriers to HIV Testing, Care, and Treatment • Structural Change Needs

  15. Resources for HIV Prevention, Care & Treatment Services(pp. 26-31) HIV Prevention Allocation Consolidating & Coordinating Resources Health Care Reform Leveraging Private Resources to Support the Strategy

  16. *Data from 2011 HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Annual Report

  17. Strategies to Address HIV Prevention, Care & Treatment(pp. 32-59) • Background • Core Activities • Syringe Access & Disposal • HIV Testing & Other Status Awareness Efforts • Comprehensive Prevention with HIV-Positive Individuals • Condom Distribution • Evidence-based Interventions for HIV-negative People at Highest Risk of Acquiring HIV (i.e., HERR) • Programs to Address HIV-Related Health Disparities • PrEP & PEP • Addressing Stigma, Discrimination & Criminalization

  18. Community Planning for HIV Prevention, Care & Treatment(pp. 60-62) The HIV Prevention Planning Council The HIV Health Services Planning Council Integrated Prevention and Health Services Planning

  19. HIV-Related Research within SFDPH (pp. 63-66) Research Conducted by the HIV Prevention Section Research Conducted by Bridge HIV Research Conducted by the HIV Epidemiology Section

  20. Timeline for Implementation & Conclusion(p. 67) Major implementation milestones for the Strategy have already been achieved. We are looking forward to measuring outcomes and understanding the successes and challenges created by our approach. The Comprehensive HIV Prevention Plan outlines in detail the objectives of the Strategy and how we will measure the outcomes.

  21. Additional Sections & Appendices • Part 1: SF HIV Strategy • Part 2: Jurisdictional Strategy for Marin • Part 3: Jurisdictional Strategy for San Mateo • Appendices • HPS RFP • CDC Required & Recommended Activities Table • Summary of Funded Programs • HIV Testing Policy

  22. Resources allocated to most disproportionately affected populations • Special projects to reach MSM, Latino MSM, African American MSM, TFSM

  23. Concurrence • HIV prevention programmatic activities and resources are being allocated to the most disproportionately affected populations that bear the greatest burden of HIV, including populations at greatest risk of HIV transmission and acquisition, in San Francisco. “The resources match the information (e.g., epidemiology, community knowledge/experience).”

  24. Q & A

More Related