1 / 8

MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING

MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING. Part of. A Learner’s Guide. AN INTRODUCTORY E-BOOK. Anandh Subramaniam & Kantesh Balani Materials Science and Engineering (MSE) Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur- 208016 Email: anandh@iitk.ac.in, URL: home.iitk.ac.in/~anandh.

bmccormick
Télécharger la présentation

MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING Part of A Learner’s Guide AN INTRODUCTORY E-BOOK Anandh Subramaniam & Kantesh Balani Materials Science and Engineering (MSE) Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur- 208016 Email:anandh@iitk.ac.in, URL:home.iitk.ac.in/~anandh http://home.iitk.ac.in/~anandh/E-book.htm

  2. Why are K1 and K2 peaks resolved at high angles? & Which ‘Line’ to use for lattice parameter calculation? • At higher Bragg angles the K1 and K2 lines are resolved(reason shown in the next slide) • Typically we use only the K1 lines for the calculation of lattice parameter • The error in the calculation of lattice parameter decreases with increasing angle → hence the high angle peaks should be used for lattice parameter calculation (instead of taking an average over all peaks or taking any of the intense low angle peaks)(as shown in slides to follow)

  3. Why are K1 and K2 peaks resolved at high angles? • The K1 (CuKα1 = 1.540598 Å) and K2 (CuKα2 = 1.54439 Å) lines differ slightly in wavelength. Hence, in principle two separate peaks should be seen in the diffraction pattern. • Usually, at low angles these peaks are merged (i.e. seen as a single peak) and at high angles these peaks are resolved (seen as two separate peaks). The question is why? • This can be understood in terms of the variation of  with  (as in this case  is not fixed) and the graphical (Ewald sphere) construction (upcoming slides). 200 K1 & K2 peaks resolved in high angle peaks(in 222 and 400 peaks this can be seen) 220 111 311 222 400 In low angle peaks K1 & K2 peaks merged

  4. 1 and 2 differ slightly in wavelength • The difference in the diffracted angle  increases with an increasing angle of diffraction  (for a given ). Plot of variation as above. • Hence, the 1 and 2 peaks are resolved at high angles Actually, the variation in 2 is to be seen

  5. Which ‘Line’ to use for lattice parameter calculation? • Typically we use only the K1 lines for the calculation of lattice parameter. And this can be done at high angles as the K1 & K2 lines are resolved at high angles. • The error in the calculation of lattice parameter decreases with increasing angle → hence the high angle peaks should be used for lattice parameter calculation (instead of taking an average over all peaks or taking any of the intense low angle peaks) (as shown in slides to follow).

  6. Let us calculate the error in d spacing as a function of the angle of diffraction For the same  the error in Sin  with 

  7. Error in d spacing Error in d spacing decreases with  → hence high angle peaks have to be used for lattice parameter calculation

  8. Determination of Lattice parameter from 2 versus Intensity Data Decreasing error Others methods exist for precise lattice parameter measurement (than just taking a single value)! *  1 , 2 peaks are resolved (1 peaks are listed)

More Related