1 / 12

Motivation

Impact of Monitoring Voltage on the Lifetime Extrapolation During the Accelerated Degradation Tests.

bowie
Télécharger la présentation

Motivation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Impact of Monitoring Voltage on the Lifetime Extrapolation During the Accelerated Degradation Tests Franklin Duan, Stephen Cooper, Amit Marathe, John Zhang, Sankaran Kartik Jayanarayanan,AMD, One AMD place, PO Box 3453, M/S 143, Sunnyvale, CA 94088Contact email: franklin.duan@amd.com, Tel: (408) 749-4795 IRW2006

  2. Motivation • Purpose: to compare or benchmark the reliability of different technology generations. • Problem statement: it is found that not only the stress voltage affects your lifetime extraction, but also the monitoring voltage will play a considerable role. Lifetime extrapolation must consider this impact. • People who are interested: mostlyindustry people, who need to compare and evaluate the reliability of each technology; or the people who want to study the lifetime in a quantitative way rather than qualitatively. IRW2006

  3. How to get the lifetime • Lifetime is usually too long to get in the use conditions. Suppose a CPU chip has 10 years lifetime and there is no way to test for 10 years. • Accelerated tests under higher voltages are usually used to extrapolate the lifetime at use conditions. • This is the method generally used in industry to obtain and evaluate the lifetime using reasonable short test time. IRW2006

  4. How the lifetime be extrapolated • Device are stressed at higher voltages and lifetimes these voltages are obtained. • The test time to obtain these lifetimes is reasonably shorter since the voltages used are higher. • Lifetime at use voltage is then extrapolated by the above lifetimes. IRW2006

  5. How the device be stressed • Device is degraded after stressed at a certain stress voltage (left chart). • The percentage of degradation (right chart) is recorded after a certain stress time period. Lifetime is obtained when a certain amount of degradation is reached. • The way the data recorded is to apply a certain voltage (e.g., VG=VD=1V in the left chart) and measure the current at each time interval. The way to choose these monitor voltages will also play a big role and cannot be ignored. This is the focus of this paper. IRW2006

  6. Impact of monitor voltage on lifetime • We have found that: lifetime is different when the monitor voltage is different, even stressed at the same stress voltage. • This is usually ignored in most of the literatures and lifetime studies. • In general, the less the monitor voltage, the lower lifetime, at the same stress voltage. IRW2006

  7. Why consider this impact (of monitor voltage) • Suppose there are two technologies which may use different monitor voltages in the reliability testing and the data is as shown above. • Now the question is: Is the lifetime difference is due to the different technologies, or due the use of different monitor voltage during the stress test? It is definitely confusing if we don’t consider the impact of the monitor voltage when doing these tests. IRW2006

  8. How to consider monitor voltage impact • VM is the monitoring voltage • V0 is the coefficient • The good news is: degradation vs. monitor voltage follows an good exponential model. Lifetime as a function of monitor voltage can then be derived from the above model. • Using this model, one can evaluate the lifetime at any given monitor voltage. • Therefore, even though we use different monitor voltage for different technology, one can still compare their lifetime accurately. IRW2006

  9. Model does not depend on stress voltage used within the same technology • As shown is the degradation vs. monitor voltage tested in the device from the same technology, but with two different stress voltages. • The slope of the fitting line is the same for different stress voltages for the device under the same technology. Hence model is independent on the stress voltage used. IRW2006

  10. But, model is dependent on different technology • As shown are the degradation vs. monitor voltage at different stress time for SOI and BULK technologies. • Both technologies follow good exponential model. But the slope rate is different. • One has to obtain the model separately for each technology. IRW2006

  11. In summary • It is generally understood that the lifetime will depend on the stress voltages used in the accelerated test. The monitoring voltage is usually ignored. • We found that the monitoring voltage has a considerable impact on the lifetime in the accelerated test: • Even using the same stressing voltage, the lifetime can be different if the monitoring voltage is different. • A good model is established to estimate the impact of the monitor voltage on lifetime • It is important and also doable to consider this impact in the lifetime evaluation, esp. to compare the reliability in different technologies or foundries. IRW2006

  12. Acknowledgement • The authors would like to thank Kurt Taylor and Steve Clark for management support for this project and technical discussions. • The authors also thank Rick Francis and Tesfay Stifanos, Martin Trench and Rolf Geilenkeuser for providing some testing and the samples. IRW2006

More Related