1 / 19

ATTENTION: SELECTIVITY AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION

ATTENTION: SELECTIVITY AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION. SELECTIVITY what events “capture” attention? how complete is selectivity? AROUSAL AND ALERTNESS does capacity change over time? how is it affected by arousal,task demands or intention? DIVIDED ATTENTION how well can we do two things at once?

brant
Télécharger la présentation

ATTENTION: SELECTIVITY AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ATTENTION: SELECTIVITY AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION • SELECTIVITY • what events “capture” attention? • how complete is selectivity? • AROUSAL AND ALERTNESS • does capacity change over time? • how is it affected by arousal,task demands or intention? • DIVIDED ATTENTION • how well can we do two things at once? • can we improve our skill in dividing attention?

  2. this is the first day of the rest of your life in the. “when in the course of …..” “and another score for the Gators ……” “.. another score, uh …” MEASURING WHERE ATTENTION IS FOCUSSED tracking eye fixations tracking ear fixations (“shadowing”)

  3. EYE TRACKING TECHNOLOGY

  4. Seven records of eye movements by the same subject. Each record lasted 3 minutes. 1)Free examination. Before subsequent recordings, the subject was asked to: 2) estimate the material circumstances of the family; 3) give the ages of the people; 4) surmise what the family had been doing before the arrival of the "unexpected visitor;" 5) remember the clothes worn by the people; 6) remember the position of the people and objects in the room; 7) estimate how long the "unexpected visitor" had been away from the family (from Yarbus (1967).

  5. DYNAMICS OF VISUAL ATTENTION Fig. 4-18, p. 122

  6. fixate center throughout trial: @ cue for likely side of test: (p. = .8) 100 to 1000 msec respond to target figure: X @ “COVERT” SHIFTS OFSPATIAL ATTENTION(Posner & Cohen, 1984)

  7. ATTENTION TO OBJECTS vs. LOCATIONS (Egly 1994) Fig. 4-22, p. 126

  8. UNILATERAL NEGLECT:Impaired shifting ofspatial attention Damage to Right Hemisphere: Left hemisphere: focus on right side of space Right Hemisphere: focus on left and right side

  9. input “channels” sensory analysis pattern recogn “early” filter SELECTIVE ATTENTION AS A SENSORY FILTER(Broadbent, 1958) • Evidence for “early” selection: • poor detection and memory for unattended input channel(s) • tendency to report concurrent inputs “by channel” left ear:2 . .4 . .9 right ear:6 . .1 . .8 report: 2,4 ,9 . .6, 1 • Evidence against “early” selection: • shadowing disrupted by S’s name • context can force switch to ignored ear • meaning of “ignored” words can affect behavior

  10. EFFECTS OF AN “UNATTENDED” WORD(MacKay, 1972) “ . . the boy threw a rock at the bank and..” “ . .scissor . . ladder . . money . . finger . .” “Ignored” words not remembered, but still bias interpretation of sentence • Evidence for “activation without awareness” • Such “automatic” effects are small, and depend on special conditions

  11. ATTENTION AS ALLOCATION OF LIMITED CAPACITY(Kahneman, 1972)

  12. Performance low high Arousal focus too narrow capacity too low AROUSAL, ATTENTION AND PERFORMANCE For many tasks, performance suffers if arousal is too low or too high (Yerkes & Dodson, 1903) + - Easterbrook, ‘59: Cue Utilization Theory

  13. task: decide if two successive letters are the same or different ? + R J press key MEASURING ATTENTIONAL ALLOCATION(Posner & Boies, 1971) • decision and response selection as attentional “bottlenecks”

  14. ignored List: NONE voice class DIFF DIFF SAME DIFF DIFF SAME Shadowed List: desk couch chair sofa etc... or THE ATTENTIONAL DEMANDS OF SHADOWING(Johnston & Heinz, 1978) RT to TONE RT to tone alone: 320 msec

  15. PRACTICE AND EXPERTISEStaszewski, 1988 task: mental multiplication 300 hours (!)of practice on simple (1 by 1) and complex (2 by 5) problems using left-to-right procedures e.g. 267 x 97: “. . nine times two is eighteen hundred; nine time six is 540, that’s 2340 . .”

  16. PRACTICE AND DIVIDED ATTENTION • Practice in shadowing (Underwood, 1976) • Task: shadow prose in left ear • and detect occasional digits in right ear • Oxford Undergrads: 13% hits • Neville Moray: 71% hits • Practice in dictation (Spelke, Hirst & Neisser, 1976) • Task: read text for meaning, and write down spoken words • after months of practice, no “cost” of dictation on reading speed or comprehension Is attention skill domain-specific?

  17. ATTENTION AND CELL PHONESStrayer, Drew & Johnston, 2003 • About 150 million cell phones • 85% use them while driving • Inattention a leading cause of crashes • So: simulated driving task (track pace car), with/out hands-free chat Drive Drive & Chat Accidents 0 3 Brake onset 933 ms 1112 ms Following distance 25.8 ft 29.3 ft Billboard recognition 6.9 3.9 Billboard fixation 0.66 0.62

  18. Date: 2003-03-27 New Study Shows Drivers Using Cell Phones Twice As Likely To Cause Rear-end Collisions CHAPEL HILL -- Drivers talking on cell phones are nearly twice as likely as other drivers involved in crashes to have rear-end collisions, according to a new University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill study. Crashes involving cell phone use, however, are less likely to result in fatalities or serious injuries than crashes not involving the devices.

  19. LAPSES OF ATTENTION:THE “COGNITIVE FAILURES QUESTIONNAIRE (CFQ) • How often do you . . . • read something and realize you haven’t been thinking about it? • forget why you went from one room to another? • bump into people? • forget if you’ve locked the door? • forget to keep appointments? • drop things? • fail to hear people speaking when you’re doing something else? • Ratings correlate with performance in tasks of selective and divided attention (e.g., stroop interference; Tipper & Baylis, 1987)

More Related