1 / 17

Organisational Turnaround: lessons from a study of ‘failing’ health care providers in England

Organisational Turnaround: lessons from a study of ‘failing’ health care providers in England. Naomi Fulop London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Acknowledgements. Project team: Fiona Scheibl Nigel Edwards Gerasimos Protopsaltis Funded by: NHS Confederation. Policy context.

brewster
Télécharger la présentation

Organisational Turnaround: lessons from a study of ‘failing’ health care providers in England

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Organisational Turnaround:lessons from a study of ‘failing’ health care providers in England Naomi Fulop London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

  2. Acknowledgements Project team: Fiona Scheibl Nigel Edwards Gerasimos Protopsaltis Funded by: NHS Confederation

  3. Policy context • New Public Management – increasing focus on performance in public sector • Performance assessment system introduced in NHS in 2001 • Health care organizations graded using ‘star rating’ system: zero, one, two, three stars (highly contested) • Policy responses: • Franchising policy (‘heroic leadership’ model) • Support from Modernisation Agency • 3 * get ‘earned autonomy’ (Foundation hospitals)

  4. What do we know from the literature? • Approx. 25-30 studies on turnaround in private sector • Explain failure in two main ways: • a) changes in external environment • b) inertia within the organisation • Dominant model of successful turnaround • Retrenchment (withdraw from unprofitable sectors) • Strategic change (new markets or new products in existing markets) • Leadership change (CEO and/or senior management team) Source: Skelcher et al (2003)

  5. Study objectives • Draw lessons from the experience of changing the management of ‘failing’ organisations • Specifically exploring: • Markers for ‘failure’ • Responses to turnaround • Strategies for turnaround • Process/Impact of these strategies

  6. Methods • Phase 1 (2002): case studies of 5 hospitals • Perceived to be ‘failing’ • New management brought in • At different stages of turnaround • Phase 2 (2003): followed up 4/5 from phase 1 plus four added: • Zero star (or ‘at risk’) • Management replaced • Support from Modernisation Agency

  7. Data collection and analysis • Semi-structured interviews with 106 internal and external stakeholders across 9 hospitals • Analysis of national and local media coverage • Changes in star ratings over time • Analysis within and between case studies

  8. Findings (1): markers for failure • Poor performance on key targets e.g. waiting lists • Financial deficits • Major developments – ‘eyes off the ball’ e.g. merger, redevelopment (PFI) • Stagnating management team • Lack of clear management structures/processes • Lack of engagement of clinicians in management of services • Poor public image e.g. relations with media and external stakeholders • Low staff morale

  9. Markers Secondary causes - “eyes off the ball” - poor relationships with external stakeholders - financial deficits INTERNAL EXTERNAL - poor financial control - increase in competition - changes in Govt policy - lack of HRM strategies - lack of leadership Organisational - introspection - arrogance - trauma Primary Causes Markers and causes offailure

  10. Findings (2): turnaround interventions • Internal reorganisation • Formally and informally involving clinicians • Introduction of systems/processes/protocols • Improving operational performance • Focus on human resources • Financial analysis and control • Attempts to change ‘organisational culture’ • External relations

  11. Findings (3): constraints on turnaround • Cultural diversity within organisations (competing sub-cultures) • Complexity (multi-layered nature of hospitals and external environment) • Lack of leadership • External influences

  12. Findings (4): impact of turnaround interventions • In short term, some showed improvements in operational performance • Takes longer to address organisational culture issues • Two groups of hospitals: • Group 1 (5): transformed from ‘failing’ to ‘self-regulating’ • Group 2 (4): stagnating or ‘permanently failing’

  13. Impact Of Turnaround Strategies? A BCDE New Management Dec 99Feb 01Dec 99April 99April 01 Star Rating 01 00*** **0 Star Rating 02 ***** ** Star Rating 03 * *** ** 0

  14. Impact Of Turnaround Strategies? FGHI New Management Mar 0101Jan 02Jun02 Star Rating 01 **2**0 Star Rating 02 *000 Star Rating 03 *2 ** 0

  15. Findings (5): resources required for turnaround • Temporal (time, stability) • Leadership skills • Ability to develop change agenda • Ability to grasp detail required to deliver core targets • External support • Financial (access to funding to achieve ‘quick wins’)

  16. Lessons for management/policy • Skills for identifying ‘at risk’ organisations • Resources required for turnaround (esp. time and leadership) • Diagnose the problem • Establish clear leadership • Secure engagement of clinical staff • Work with external stakeholders • Right people in right posts • Use internal reward systems • Use external support systems

More Related